金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以大学生为被试,采用任务分配范式,实验1考察了金钱概念启动和道德认同对个体道德伪善的影响;实验2探讨了金钱丰富程度启动和道德认同对个体道德伪善的影响。结果发现:(1)与控制组相比,金钱概念启动使得言行不一的人数显著增加;与金钱匮乏感启动组相比,金钱富足感启动使得言行不一的人数显著增加;(2)低道德认同被试中道德伪善者的比例显著高于高道德认同被试;而且金钱启动显著增加了高道德认同被试的道德伪善。该研究启示我们减少情境中的金钱等与利益有关的线索以及提高个体的道德认同水平,将有利于减少道德伪善的发生。

关键词: 大学生, 道德伪善, 金钱启动, 金钱丰富程度, 道德认同

Abstract: Taking undergraduates as subjects, using the task assignment paradigm, Experiment 1 examines the influence of money priming and moral identity on individual moral hypocrisy. Experiment 2 explores the influence of the priming of money abundance and moral identity on individual moral hypocrisy. The results show that: (1) Compared with the control group, money priming caused a significant increase in the number of people who saying one thing and doing another; compared with the group of money scarcity, the priming of money abundance increased the number of people who saying one thing and doing another; (2) The proportion of moral hypocrisy among subjects with low moral identity was significantly higher than those with high moral identity; moreover, money priming significantly increased the moral hypocrisy of subjects with high moral identity. The research reveals that we can reduce the profit-related clues such as money in the situation and improve the level of individual moral identity, which will help reduce the occurrence of moral hypocrisy.

Key words: undergraduates, moral hypocrisy, money priming, money abundance, moral identity

中图分类号:

B844

杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.

DU Xiufang, WU Yuxi, XU Zheng, YUAN Xiaoqian, CHEN Gongxiang. Effect of Money Priming and Moral Identity on Undergraduates’ Moral Hypocrisy[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.

参考文献

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior:The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Batson, C. D. (1991).The altruism question:Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale:Erlbaum Associates.
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., & Brandt, J. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52-77.
Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampt, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice:Unmasking moral hypocrisy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335-1348.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy:Appearing moral to oneself without being so.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525-537.
Caruso, E. M., Shapira, O., & Landy, J. F. (2017). Show me the money:A systematic exploration of manipulations, moderators, and mechanisms of priming effects.Psychological Science, 28(8), 1148-1159.
Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142(2), 301-306.
Crawford, J. T., Fournier, A., & Ruscio, J. (2019). Does subjective SES moderate the effect of money priming on socioeconomic system support? A replication of Schuler and Wänke (2016).Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 103-109.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses.Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Gasiorowska, A., Zaleskiewicz, T., & Kesebir, P. (2018). Money as an existential anxiety buffer:Exposure to money prevents mortality reminders from leading to increased death thoughts.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 394-409.
Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, money, and morality.Psychological Science, 25(2), 414-421.
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect:Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142-155.
Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation:How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191-203.
Graham, J., Meindl, P., Koleva, S., Iyer, R., & Johnson, K. (2015). When values and behavior conflict:Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 158-170.
Jim, M. (2007). Review of moral development, self, and identity.Journal of Moral Education, 36(2), 264-266.
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green:Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 53-61.
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy:Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744.
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving:The time-ask effect.Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
Lodder, P., Ong, H. H., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019). A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 148(4), 688-712.
L nnqvist, J. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Walkowitz, G. (2014). Moral hypocrisy:Impression management or self-deception? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 53-62.
Mok, A., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Strengthened to forgive workplace transgressions:Priming new money increases interpersonal forgiveness.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(8), 437-450.
Mok, A., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Too tired to focus on others? Reminders of money promote considerate responses in the face of depletion.Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 405-421.
Savani, K., Mead, N. L., Stillman, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). No match for money:Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses.Self and Identity, 15(3), 342-355.
Sharma, E., Maza, N., Alte, A. L., & Ariely, D. (2014). Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 90-100.
Skarlicki, D.P., van Jaarsveld, D.D., Shao, R., Song, Y.H., & Wang, M. (2016). Extending the multifoci perspective:The role of supervisor justice and moral identity in the relationship between customer justice and customer-directed sabotage.Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 108-121.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue:Deconstructing the moral hypocrite.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1334-1338.
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money.Science, 314(17), 1154-1156.
Xie, W. W., Yu, B. Y., Zhou, X.Y., Sedikides, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2014). Money, moral transgressions, and blame.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 299-306.
郭国庆, 陈炜. (2015). 金钱线索对消费决策质量的影响机制. 中国科技论坛, (4), 124-129.
莫田甜, 周欣悦. (2020). 金钱的社会资源理论:十年回顾与展望. 应用心理学, 26(1),3-14.
沈汪兵, 刘昌. (2010). 道德判断:理性还是非理性的?来自认知神经科学的研究. 心理科学, 33(4), 807-810.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2013). 道德推脱与大学生亲社会行为:道德认同的调节效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 904-909.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2015). 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用.心理发展与教育, 31(3), 311-318.
杨治良, 刘素珍, 赵华, 吴梦麟. (1996). 内隐情感记忆实验研究I:精神分裂症情感记忆特征.中国临床心理学杂志, (4), 193-196.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[6]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[7]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[8]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[9]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[10]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[11]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[12]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[13]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[14]	蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.
[15]	张春阳, 徐慰. 儿童期创伤与有留守经历大学生负性情绪：心理韧性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 584-591.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed