金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以大学生为被试,采用任务分配范式,实验1考察了金钱概念启动和道德认同对个体道德伪善的影响;实验2探讨了金钱丰富程度启动和道德认同对个体道德伪善的影响。结果发现:(1)与控制组相比,金钱概念启动使得言行不一的人数显著增加;与金钱匮乏感启动组相比,金钱富足感启动使得言行不一的人数显著增加;(2)低道德认同被试中道德伪善者的比例显著高于高道德认同被试;而且金钱启动显著增加了高道德认同被试的道德伪善。该研究启示我们减少情境中的金钱等与利益有关的线索以及提高个体的道德认同水平,将有利于减少道德伪善的发生。

关键词: 大学生, 道德伪善, 金钱启动, 金钱丰富程度, 道德认同

Abstract: Taking undergraduates as subjects, using the task assignment paradigm, Experiment 1 examines the influence of money priming and moral identity on individual moral hypocrisy. Experiment 2 explores the influence of the priming of money abundance and moral identity on individual moral hypocrisy. The results show that: (1) Compared with the control group, money priming caused a significant increase in the number of people who saying one thing and doing another; compared with the group of money scarcity, the priming of money abundance increased the number of people who saying one thing and doing another; (2) The proportion of moral hypocrisy among subjects with low moral identity was significantly higher than those with high moral identity; moreover, money priming significantly increased the moral hypocrisy of subjects with high moral identity. The research reveals that we can reduce the profit-related clues such as money in the situation and improve the level of individual moral identity, which will help reduce the occurrence of moral hypocrisy.

Key words: undergraduates, moral hypocrisy, money priming, money abundance, moral identity

中图分类号:

B844

杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.

DU Xiufang, WU Yuxi, XU Zheng, YUAN Xiaoqian, CHEN Gongxiang. Effect of Money Priming and Moral Identity on Undergraduates’ Moral Hypocrisy[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.

参考文献

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior:The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Batson, C. D. (1991).The altruism question:Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale:Erlbaum Associates.
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., & Brandt, J. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52-77.
Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampt, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice:Unmasking moral hypocrisy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335-1348.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy:Appearing moral to oneself without being so.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525-537.
Caruso, E. M., Shapira, O., & Landy, J. F. (2017). Show me the money:A systematic exploration of manipulations, moderators, and mechanisms of priming effects.Psychological Science, 28(8), 1148-1159.
Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142(2), 301-306.
Crawford, J. T., Fournier, A., & Ruscio, J. (2019). Does subjective SES moderate the effect of money priming on socioeconomic system support? A replication of Schuler and Wänke (2016).Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 103-109.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses.Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Gasiorowska, A., Zaleskiewicz, T., & Kesebir, P. (2018). Money as an existential anxiety buffer:Exposure to money prevents mortality reminders from leading to increased death thoughts.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 394-409.
Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, money, and morality.Psychological Science, 25(2), 414-421.
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect:Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142-155.
Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation:How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191-203.
Graham, J., Meindl, P., Koleva, S., Iyer, R., & Johnson, K. (2015). When values and behavior conflict:Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 158-170.
Jim, M. (2007). Review of moral development, self, and identity.Journal of Moral Education, 36(2), 264-266.
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green:Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 53-61.
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy:Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744.
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving:The time-ask effect.Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
Lodder, P., Ong, H. H., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019). A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 148(4), 688-712.
L nnqvist, J. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Walkowitz, G. (2014). Moral hypocrisy:Impression management or self-deception? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 53-62.
Mok, A., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Strengthened to forgive workplace transgressions:Priming new money increases interpersonal forgiveness.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(8), 437-450.
Mok, A., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Too tired to focus on others? Reminders of money promote considerate responses in the face of depletion.Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 405-421.
Savani, K., Mead, N. L., Stillman, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). No match for money:Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses.Self and Identity, 15(3), 342-355.
Sharma, E., Maza, N., Alte, A. L., & Ariely, D. (2014). Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 90-100.
Skarlicki, D.P., van Jaarsveld, D.D., Shao, R., Song, Y.H., & Wang, M. (2016). Extending the multifoci perspective:The role of supervisor justice and moral identity in the relationship between customer justice and customer-directed sabotage.Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 108-121.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue:Deconstructing the moral hypocrite.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1334-1338.
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money.Science, 314(17), 1154-1156.
Xie, W. W., Yu, B. Y., Zhou, X.Y., Sedikides, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2014). Money, moral transgressions, and blame.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 299-306.
郭国庆, 陈炜. (2015). 金钱线索对消费决策质量的影响机制. 中国科技论坛, (4), 124-129.
莫田甜, 周欣悦. (2020). 金钱的社会资源理论:十年回顾与展望. 应用心理学, 26(1),3-14.
沈汪兵, 刘昌. (2010). 道德判断:理性还是非理性的?来自认知神经科学的研究. 心理科学, 33(4), 807-810.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2013). 道德推脱与大学生亲社会行为:道德认同的调节效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 904-909.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2015). 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用.心理发展与教育, 31(3), 311-318.
杨治良, 刘素珍, 赵华, 吴梦麟. (1996). 内隐情感记忆实验研究I:精神分裂症情感记忆特征.中国临床心理学杂志, (4), 193-196.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2]	万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3]	张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响：任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[4]	赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[5]	丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[6]	王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[7]	魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[8]	焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[9]	胡心怡, 陈英和. 大学生新目标投入能力、自我损耗与幸福感的关系:生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 348-356.
[10]	谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 胡宇飞, 杨喜兰, 席娟. 脱贫内生动力对贫困大学生学习投入的影响:自我控制的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 386-397.
[11]	赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.
[12]	廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[13]	郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[14]	相硕琪, 李亚丹, 叶超群, 杨伟星, 郭习佩, 张玲玲, 胡卫平. 创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系: 认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 32-41.
[15]	史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed