网络视频课程中师生交互与大学生网络学习绩效的关系:学习自我效能感与学习动机的序列中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.02.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于建构主义学习理论，采用问卷调查法以湖北省武汉市两所大学四个年级544名参与网络课堂的大学生为被试，探讨网络师生交互与网络学习绩效之间的关系，以及网络学习自我效能感和网络学习动机在其中的序列中介作用。结果发现：（1）网络师生交互、网络学习自我效能感、网络学习动机与网络学习绩效两两之间均显著正相关；（2）网络师生交互对网络学习绩效的直接效应和间接效应均显著。间接效应包含了两条路径：通过网络学习自我效能感的部分中介作用和通过网络学习自我效能感-网络学习动机的序列中介作用。这一结论有助于理解网络师生交互对网络学习绩效的作用机制，为未来网络教育的开展提供建议。

关键词: 大学生, 网络师生交互, 网络自我效能感, 网络学习动机, 网络学习绩效

Abstract: In this study, we recruited 544 college students who participated in online course to explore the relationship between internet teacher-student interaction and online learning performance, and the mediating effect of the internet learning self-efficacy and internet learning motivation. The results show that:(1) The relationship between each pair of internet teacher-student interaction, internet learning self-efficacy, internet learning motivation and online learning performance were all significantly positive; (2) The internet teacher-student interaction not only had a direct effect on online learning performance, but also had an indirectly effect on online learning performance through two ways:through internet learning self-efficacy and through the chain mediating effect of the internet learning self-efficacy and the internet learning motivation. This study helps to understand the mechanism of internet teacher-student interaction on the online learning performance, and provide advice on the development of online education.

Key words: university student, internet teacher-student interaction, internet learning self-efficacy, internet learning motivation, internet learning performance

段朝辉, 洪建中. 网络视频课程中师生交互与大学生网络学习绩效的关系:学习自我效能感与学习动机的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 184-191.

DUAN Zhaohui, HONG Jianzhong. The Relationship between Internet Teacher-student Interaction and Online learning Performance: The Mediating Effect of Internet Learning Self-efficacy and Internet Learning Motivation[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(2): 184-191.

参考文献

Abeer, W., & Miri, B. (2014). Students' preferences and views about learning in a MOOC. Paper presented at the ERPA International Congress on Education. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education:Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126.
Bryant, J., & Bates, A. J. (2015). Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. TechTrends, 59(2), 17-22.
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement:A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78-96.
Cetin-Dindar, A. (2015). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247.
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn:An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014.
Cummings, C., Mason, D., Shelton, K., & Baur, K. (2017). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Flipped instruction:Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 88-114). PA:IGI Global.
Deng, R., & Benckendorff, P. (2017). A contemporary review of research methods adopted to understand students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(8), 601-607.
Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning:An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024-1033.
Frith, C. (1997). Motivation to learn. Retrieved 16. 01. 2014 from http://general.utpb.edu/FAC/keast_d/Tunebooks/pdf/Motivation.pdf
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. From http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/statswiki/FAQ/SobelTest, 2012.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs):Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12(Supplement C), 45-58.
Jacobs, A. J. (2013). Two cheers for Web U. New York Times, 162(56113), 1-7.
Jashapara, A., & Tai, W.-C. (2011). Knowledge mobilization through e-learning systems:Understanding the mediating roles of self-efficacy and anxiety on perceptions of ease of use. Information Systems Management, 28(1), 71-83.
Joo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.
Lee, J.K., & Lee, W.K. (2008). The relationship of e-learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47.
Maddux, J. E. (2016). Self-efficacy:The power of believing you can. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 55-60). New York:Oxford University Press.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters:Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121-131.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways:The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms:Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1-12.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society:The development of higher mental process. Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
Wilson, B. G. (1996). Introduction:What is a constructivist learning environment? In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 3-8). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
陈吉荣. (2016). 国外慕课研究最新发展述评. 外语教学与研究, 48(1), 118-127.
陈琦, 张建伟. (1998). 建构主义学习观要义评析. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 6(1), 61-68.
陈勇. (2008). 网络外语学习中的动机研究(硕士学位论文). 上海外国语大学.
方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. (2012). 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量:回顾与展望. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 105-111.
贾斌. (2014). 师生交互对网络学习绩效的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 聊城大学.
贾斌, 徐恩芹, 张景生. (2013). 国内学习绩效研究发展综述. 电化教育研究, 34(11), 53-58.
雷玉菊, 周宗奎, 田媛. (2017). 网络学习环境下学习者的动机信念对学习投入的影响. 中国电化教育, 195(2), 82-88.
林毅夫. (2014). 挖掘慕课所蕴含的重大机遇. In 汤敏 (Ed.), 慕课革命互联网如何变革教育 (Vol. 1). 北京:中信出版社.
石茹. (2015). 交互质量知觉, 动机信念与学习满意度的关系研究:情绪的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
孙洪涛, 郑勤华, 陈丽. (2016). 中国 MOOCs 教学交互状况调查研究. 开放教育研究, 22(1), 72-79.
谢幼如, 刘春华, 朱静静, 尹睿. (2011). 大学生网络学习自我效能感的结构, 影响因素及培养策略研究. 电化教育研究, 213(10), 30-34.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769.
徐恩芹. (2016). 师生交互影响网络学习绩效的实证分析. 电化教育研究, 37(9), 61-68.
阎秋娟. (2016). 国内慕课 (MOOCs) 研究进展. 图书馆理论与实践, 195(1), 19-24.
尹睿, 许丹娜. (2011). 网络学习环境与大学生学习自我效能感关系的研究报告. 电化教育研究, 220(8), 46-52.
张金磊, 王颖, 张宝辉. (2012). 翻转课堂教学模式研究. 远程教育杂志, 4(4), 46-51.
郑云翔. (2015). 新建构主义视角下大学生个性化学习的教学模式探究. 远程教育杂志, 33(4), 48-58.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[6]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[8]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[9]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[10]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[11]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[14]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[15]	蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed