心理发展与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 176-183.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.02.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父亲协同教养行为与青少年同伴依恋的关系:父子依恋的中介作用与青少年情绪性的调节作用

黄彬彬1, 邹盛奇1, 伍新春1, 刘畅1,2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心, 北京 100875;
    2. 北京教育学院学前教育学院, 北京 100120
  • 发布日期:2019-04-19
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春,E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育科学“十二五”规划重点课题“父亲与母亲教养投入对青少年心理适应影响的比较研究”（AFA15199）。

The Association between Father Coparenting Behavior and Adolescents' Peer Attachment: The Mediating Role of Father-child Attachment and the Moderating Role of Adolescents' Neuroticism

HUANG Binbin1, ZOU Shengqi1, WU Xinchun1, LIU Chang1,2   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Faculty of Early Childhood Education, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing 100120
  • Published:2019-04-19

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 以3045位青少年为被试，采用父母协同教养问卷青少年评价版的父亲卷、青少年依恋问卷中的父子依恋和同伴依恋分问卷、中学生人格五因素问卷的情绪性维度进行测量，基于家庭系统理论、协同教养的生态模型和依恋的内部工作模式理论构建了一个有调节的中介模型。结果发现：（1）父子依恋在父亲协同教养的团结、贬低行为与青少年同伴依恋之间发挥中介作用；（2）青少年的情绪性在父子依恋影响青少年同伴依恋的关系中起调节作用，即情绪性调节了中介过程的后半路径，具体而言，当青少年情绪性升高时，父子依恋对青少年同伴依恋的促进作用减弱。本研究的结果有助于完善协同教养的相关理论，对加强青少年家庭中的父亲协同教养行为具有实践意义。

关键词: 父亲协同教养行为, 父子依恋, 同伴依恋, 情绪性, 青少年

Abstract: This study explored how father coparenting behavior influenced peer attachment in families with adolescents, based on family systems theory, ecological model of coparenting and internal working model in attachment theory. A total of 3045 adolescents were tested using the father subscale of Adolescence Revision of Coparenting Scale, father and peer items of The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, the neuroticism dimension from Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire for Midd1e School Student.Results suggested that:(1) Father-child attachment played a mediating role between father coparenting behavior (only for family integrity and disparagement) and peer attachment. (2) adolescents' neuroticism moderated the relationship between father-child attachment and peer attachment. And the relationship between father-child attachment and peer attachment became weaker as neuroticism increased. The current study not only supports ecological model of coparenting, but also provides new perspective for practice in father coparenting.

Key words: father coparenting behavior, father-child attachment, peer attachment, neuroticism, adolescent

Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment:Individual differences and their relationships to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454.
Baril, M. E., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2007). Processes linking adolescent well-being, marital love, and coparenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 645-654.
Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London:Tavistock/Routledge.
Brown, G. L., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Neff, C. (2010). Observed and reported supportive coparenting as predictors of infant-mother and infant-father attachment security. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1-2), 121-137.
Caldera, Y. M., & Lindsey, E. W. (2006). Coparenting, mother-infant interaction, and infant-parent attachment relationships in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 275-83.
Canli, T. (2008). Toward a neurogenetic theory of emotional instability. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1129(1), 153-174.
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of Attachment:Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US:Guilford Press.
Doyle, A. B., Lawford, H., & Markiewicz, D. (2009). Attachment style with mother, father, best friend and romantic partner during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 690-714.
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations:A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 108-132.
Feinberg, M. E. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting:A framework for research and intervention. Parenting:Science and Practice, 3(2), 95-131.
Freeman, H. S. (1997). Who do you turn to? Individual differences in late adolescent perceptions of parents and peers as attachment figures(PhD thesis), The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 267-290.
Leary, A., & Katz, L. F. (2004). Coparenting, family-level processes, and peer outcomes:The moderating role of vagal tone. Development and Psychopathology, 16(3), 593-608.
Ma, C. Q., & Huebner, E. S. (2008). Attachment relationships and adolescents' life satisfaction:Some relationships matter more to girls than boys. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2), 177-190.
McConnell, M. C., & Kerig, P. K. (2002). Assessing coparenting in families of school-age children:Validation of the coparenting and family rating system. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 34, 44-58.
McHale, J. P. (1997). Overt and covert coparenting processes in the family. Family Process, 36(2), 183-201.
McHale, J. P., Kuersten-Hogan, R., Lauretti, A., & Rasmussen, J. L. (2000). Parental reports of coparenting and observed coparenting behavior during the toddler period. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(2), 220-236.
Mickelson, K. D., & Biehle, S. N. (2017). Gender and the transition to parenthood:introduction to the special issue. Sex Roles, 76(5-6), 271-275.
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development:Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56(2), 289-302.
Olsen, S. O., Prebensen, N., & Larsen, T. A. (2009). Including ambivalence as a basis for benefit segmentation:A study of convenience food in Norway. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 762-783.
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course:A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25.
Roisman, G. I., & Dante, C. (2017). A process model of the implications of spillover from coparenting conflicts into the parent-child attachment relationship in adolescence. Development & Psychopathology, 29(2), 417-431.
Teubert, D., & Pinquart, M. (2010). The association between coparenting and child adjustment:A meta-analysis. Parenting:Science and Practice, 10(4), 286-307.
Wainright, J. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Peer relations among adolescents with female same-sex parents. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 117-126.
Zack, C. A. (2015). Interparental conflict:Parent-adolescent attachment and personality (PhD thesis). Alliant International University, San Diego.
方杰, 温忠麟, 梁东梅, 李霓霓. (2015). 基于多元回归的调节效应分析. 心理科学, 38(3), 715-720.
胡牡丽, 王孟成, 蔡琳, 朱熊兆, 姚树桥. (2012). 青少年主观社会经济地位量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(2), 155-157.
黄敏学, 冯小亮, 谢亭亭. (2010). 消费者态度的新认知:二元化的矛盾态度. 心理科学进展, 18(6), 987-996.
李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞. (2008). 大学生同一性发展及其与亲子依恋的关系研究. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 113-119.
李育辉, 张建新. (2004). 中学生人格特质、主观应激与应对风格之间的关系. 心理学报, 36(1), 71-77.
刘畅, 伍新春. (2015). 协同教养的研究缘起、结构与评估. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(1), 32-37.
刘畅, 伍新春, 陈玲玲. (2014). 父母协同教养问卷中文版的修订及其信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(4), 727-730.
刘畅, 伍新春, 邹盛奇. (2017). 青少年评价父母协同教养问卷的修订及其信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 845-849+881.
王莉. (2005). 国外父亲教养方式研究的现状和趋势. 心理科学进展, 13(3), 290-297.
王英芊, 邹泓, 侯珂, 王明珠, 汤玉龙, 潘斌. (2016). 亲子依恋、同伴依恋与青少年消极情感的关系:有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 226-235.
王争艳, 程南华. (2014). 共同养育研究及对儿童适应的影响. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 889-901.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
吴庆兴, 王美芳. (2014). 亲子依恋、同伴依恋与青少年焦虑症状的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(4), 684-687.
钟歆, 刘聚红, 陈旭. (2014). 青少年同伴依恋:基于发展的视角. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1149-1158.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
周晖, 钮丽丽, 邹泓. (2000). 中学生人格五因素问卷的编制. 心理发展与教育, 16(1), 48-54.
[1] 郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5] 黎钰林, 吴德华, 卿亿承, 李丹, 尹华站. 童年期虐待对初中生主观幸福感的影响：同伴依恋的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 254-263.
[6] 王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[7] 李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[8] 向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[9] 边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[10] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[11] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[12] 王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[13] 陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[14] 汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[15] 张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发