心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 257-265.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.02.13

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用

刘勤学1,2, 张聚媛1,2, 林悦1,2   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2021-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 刘勤学 E-mail:qinxueliu@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省教育科学规划项目(2017GB004);华中师范大学基本科研业务费(自然科学)重大培育项目(CCNU18ZDPY07);华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU20TS029)。

The Relationship between College Students' Smartphone Addiction and Inhibitory Control: The Moderating Roles of Phone Position and Cognitive Load

LIU Qinxue1,2, ZHANG Juyuan1,2, LIN Yue1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU), Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, National Experimental Teaching Demonstrating Center of Psychology, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2021-03-23

摘要: 本研究以66名大学生为被试,采用Flanker效应和工作记忆的双任务设计来探讨手机位置、认知负荷在智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力之间的调节作用。结果发现:(1)在低认知负荷下,无论是否智能手机成瘾,手机存在视线之外比手机在视线之内时抑制控制能力更差;(2)在高认知负荷下,智能手机成瘾与手机位置交互作用显著:当手机在视线之内时,智能手机成瘾者的抑制控制能力显著差于非成瘾者;而当手机在视线之外时,两者没有显著差异。结果表明,智能手机成瘾大学生的抑制控制能力不仅会受到手机位置的影响,还会受到任务本身所带来的认知负荷的调节。

关键词: 大学生, 智能手机成瘾, 手机位置, 认知负荷, 抑制控制

Abstract: The present study examined the moderating roles of phone position and cognitive load on the relationship between smartphone addiction and inhibitory control ability among college students. A total of 66 college students participated in this study and they were asked to finish the dual task design of Flanker effect task and working memory task. The results showed that, on the low cognitive load condition, the inhibitory control ability of people whose smartphones were in their bags/pockets (out of sight) was significantly worse than those whose smartphones were sitting in front of them (in sight). On the high cognitive load condition, there was a significant interaction between smartphone addiction and phone position: When the smartphone was in sight, the inhibitory control ability of smartphone addicts was significantly worse than non-addicts; when the phone was out of sight, the difference of the inhibitory control ability of smartphone addicts and non-addicts was not significant. These findings indicated that the effect of smartphone addicts' inhibitory control ability among the college students was moderated by both phone position and cognitive load.

Key words: college student, smartphone addiction, phone position, cognitive load, inhibitory control

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Ahn, J., & Jung, Y. (2016). The common sense of dependence on smartphone:A comparison between digital natives and digital immigrants. New Media & Society, 18, 1236-1256.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139-168.
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 477-500.
Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractorfiltering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40(10), 1183-1192.
Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015).The extended iself:The impact of iphone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer -mediated Communication, 20(2), 119-135.
Chen, J., Liang, Y., Mai, C., Zhong, X., & Qu, C. (2016). General deficit in inhibitory control of excessive smartphone users:Evidence from an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-9.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 215-229.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions.Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
Fecteau, J. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing:A priority map for target selection.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 382-390.
Fougnie, D., Suchow, J. W., & Alvarez, G. A. (2012). Variability in the quality of visual working memory. Nature Communications, 3, 1229.
Hadlington, L. J. (2015). Cognitive failures in daily life:Exploring the link with Internet addiction and problematic mobile phone use.Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 75-81.
Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2016). Is the smartphone a smart choice? The effect of smartphone separation on executive functions. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 329-336.
Haug, S., Castro, R. P., Kwon, M., Filler, A., Kowatsch, T., & Schaub, M. P. (2015). Smart-phone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 299-307.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Ko, C. H., Hsieh, T. J., Wang, P. W., Lin, W. C., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., …Yen, J. Y. (2015). Altered gray matter density and disrupted functional connectivity of the amygdala in adults with Internet gaming disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 57, 185-192.
Koshino, H., & Olid, P. (2016).Interactions between modality of working memory load and perce-ptual load in distract or processing. The Journal of General Psychology, 142, 135-149.
Kwon M, Lee J., Won W., Park, J., Min, J., Hahn, C., …Kim D-J. (2013). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS One, 8(2), Article e56936.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056936
Lange-Malecki, B., & Treue, S. (2012). A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli.Vision Research, 62, 134-138.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004).Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133, 339-354.
Li, J., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. E. (2015). Locus of control and cell phone use:Implications for sleep quality, academic performance, and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 450-457.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature, 390, 279-281.
Lui, K. F., & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 647e653.
Mendoza, J. S., Pody, B. C., Lee, S., Kim, M., & Mcdonough, I. M. (2018). The effect of cellphones on attention and learning:The influences of time, distraction, and nomophobia. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 52-60.
Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajärvi, L., Salo, E., Carlson, S., Salonen, O., & Alho, K. (2016). Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. Neuroimage, 134, 113-121.
Minear, M., Brasher, F., McCurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1274-1281.
Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A. & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty Years of Load Theory- Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go Next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1316-1340.
Murphy, K., McLauchlan, S., & Lee, M. (2017).Is there a link between media-multitasking and the executive functions of filtering and response inhibition? Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 667-677.
Nielsen P, Fjuk A.(2010). The reality beyond the hype:Mobile Internet is primarily an extension of PC-based Internet. The Information Society, 26(5), 375-382.
Noe, B., Turner, L. D., Linden, D. E., Allen, S. M., Winkens, B., & Whitaker, R. M. (2019). Identifying indicators of smartphone addiction through user-App interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 56-65.
Oaten, M. J., & Cheng, K. (2006). Longitudinal gains in self-regulation from regular physical exercise.British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 717-733.
Park, C. S. (2019). Examination of smartphone dependence:Functionally and existentially dependent behavior on the smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 123-128.
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2019). Smartphone and self-extension:Functionally, anthropomorphically, and ontologically extending self via the smartphone. Mobile Media and Communication, 7(2), 215-231.
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving:An incentive sensitization theory of addietion.Brain Research Reviews, 18(3), 247-291.
Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L.,& Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it:Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computer in Humman Behavior, 29, 948-958.
Sadeh, N., & Bredemeier, K. (2011). Individual differences at high perceptual load:The relation between trait anxiety and selective attention. Cognition Emotion, 25, 747-755.
Sapacz, M., Rockman, G., & Clark, J. (2016). Are we addicted to our cell phones?Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 153-159.
SecurEnvoy. (2012). 66% of the population suffer from Nomophobia the fear of being without their phone. Retrieved from http://www.securenvoy.com/blog/2012/02/16/66-of-the-population-suffer-from-nomophobia-the-fear-of-being-withouttheirphone/
Sussman, S., Rozgonjuk, D., & Van den Eijnden, R. J. (2017). Substance and behavioral addictions may share a similar underlying process of dysregulation. Addiction, 112(10), 1717-1718.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving:Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Thornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014). The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting. Social Psychology, 45(6), 479-488.
Toda, M., Monden, K., Kubo, K., & Morimoto, K. (2006). Mobile phone dependence and health- related lifestyle of university students. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 34(10), 1277-1284.
Wajcman, J., & Rose, E. (2011).Constant connectivity:Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies, 32, 941-961.
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos,M. W. (2017). Brain Drain:The mere presence of one's own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140-154.
Weil, R. S., Wykes, V., Carmel, D., & Rees, G. (2012). Opposite effects of perceptual and working memory load on perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 36-44.
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition:A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 605.
丁相玲, 祖静, 张向葵. (2018).抑制控制训练对手机依赖大学生的干预效果. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 342-348.
贺金波, 聂余峰, 周宗奎, 柴瑶. (2017). 网络游戏成瘾与海洛因成瘾存在相同的神经机制吗?——基于MRI的证据. 心理科学进展, 25(8), 1327-1336.
刘志英, 库逸轩. (2017). 知觉表征精度对工作记忆中抑制干扰能力的影响.心理学报, 49(10), 1247-1255.
刘勤学, 杨燕, 林悦, 余思, 周宗奎. (2017). 智能手机成瘾:概念、测量及影响因素. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1), 82-87.
林悦, 刘勤学, 邓寒, 李羽萱, 丁凯旋. (2018). 智能手机成瘾者的注意执行控制功能:心智游移的作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 273-283.
齐森青. (2014). 特质焦虑影响抑制控制的认知神经机制(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
苏双, 刘勤学, 潘婷婷, 王宇静. (2014). 大学生智能手机成瘾与自我控制的关系. 中国学校卫生, 35, 155-157.
苏双, 潘婷婷, 刘勤学, 陈潇雯, 王宇静, 李明月. (2014). 大学生智能手机成瘾量表的初步编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(5), 392-397.
谭金凤. (2017). 知觉负荷与工作记忆内容在选择性注意中的作用(博士学位论文). 西南大学,重庆.
汪海彬, 陶炎坤, 徐宏图. (2015). 不同手机依赖程度大学生的抑制控制特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(3), 226-229.
王旭江. (2013). 网络成瘾大学生不同情绪状态下工作记忆特征(硕士学位论文). 江西师范大学, 南昌.
中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC). (2019). 第44次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 北京:中国互联网络信息中心. (2019-8). http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201908/t20190830_70800.htm
张明明. (2013). 认知负载对抑制控制影响的认知行为与 ERP研究(硕士学位论文). 安徽师范大学, 芜湖.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系:外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3] 张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响:无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4] 彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[5] 何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[6] 杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[7] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[8] 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[9] 曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[10] 于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[11] 陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[12] 郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[13] 王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[14] 朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[15] 张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!