心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 1-11.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.01.01
• 认知与社会性发展 • 下一篇
于晓1, 张和颐2, 戚玥3,4, 陈英和3,4, 刘浩宁1, 赵煜燨1, 乔学文5
YU Xiao1, ZHANG Heyi2, QI Yue3,4, CHEN Yinghe3,4, LIU Haoning1, ZHAO Yuxi1, QIAO Xuewen5
摘要: 本研究采用负启动范式,设置不同的认知负荷任务,探究抑制控制在儿童和成人类比映射中的作用。实验一中,31名7岁儿童、33名10岁儿童和34名成人完成高认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,且负启动效应随年龄增长而减小。实验二中,30名7岁儿童、30名10岁儿童和32名成人完成低认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,但负启动效应无显著年龄差异。本研究的结果揭示了抑制控制和认知负荷在类比映射发展中的重要作用。
中图分类号:
Aïte, A., Berthoz, A., Vidal, J., Roëll, M., Zaoui, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Taking a third-person perspective requires inhibitory control:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study.Child Development, 87(6), 1825-1840. Borst, G., Poirel, N., Pineau, A., Cassotti, M., & Houdé, O. (2013). Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults:A developmental negative priming study. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1366-1374. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(3), 352-371. Clement, C. A., Harris, R. C., Burns, B. M., & Weatherholt, T. N. (2010). An eye-tracking analysis of the effect of prior comparison on analogical mapping.Current Psychology, 29(4), 273-287. Doumas, L. A., Morrison, R. G., & Richland, L. E. (2010). Differences in development of analogy across cultures:A computational account. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.),Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2338-2343). Cognitive Science Society. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Ferguson, R. W. (1998). Analogy just looks like high level perception:Why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 231-257. Forster,S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors:The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 14(1), 73-83. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170. Glady, Y., French, R. M., & Thibaut, J. P. (2017). Children's failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration?Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 707.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00707 Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., … Thompson, P. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(21), 8174-8179. Gotseva-Balgaranova, K., & Mutafchieva, M. (2018). Does training in inhibition and working memory influence analogical reasoning and theory of mind in young children? In T. T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceeding of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp.1735-1740).Austin, TX:Cogntive Science Society. Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013).Surfaces and essence:Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York:Basic Books. Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2014). Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults:Brain imaging and mental chronometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(7), Article 616.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00616 Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 148.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148 Houdé, O., Pineau, A., Leroux, G., Poirel, N., Perchey, G., Lanoë, C., … Mazoyer, B. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children:A neo-Piagetian approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 332-346. Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Chen, Y. (2019). Inhibiting intuitive rules in a geometry comparison task:Do age level and math achievement matter?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 1-16. Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Lei, Y. (2020). Do teachers need to inhibit heuristic Bias in mathematics problem-solving? Evidence from a negative-priming study. Current Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01209-x Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., Zhong, L., & Lei, Y. (2019). The role of inhibitory control in overcoming English written-verb inflection errors:Evidence from Chinese ESL learners. Current Psychology, 40, 5256-5266. Keane, M. T. (1997). What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 946-967. Knowlton, B. J., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). A neurocomputational system for relational reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 373-381. Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Structural constraints and object similarity in analogical mapping and inference.Thinking & Reasoning, 10(1), 85-104. Lanoë, C., Vidal, J., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Inhibitory control is needed to overcome written verb inflection errors:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study. Cognitive Development, 37, 18-27. Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000).The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1038-1052. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 56(2), 183-197. Linzarini, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). When Stroop helps Piaget:An inter-task positive priming paradigm in 9-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 71-82. Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems:A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701-708. Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., & O'Hearn, K. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101-113. Megías, M., Ortells, J. J., Noguera, C., Carmona, I., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2020). Semantic negative priming from an ignored single-prime depends critically on prime-mask inter-stimulus interval and working memory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1227.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01227 Mix, K. S. (2008). Children's numerical equivalence judgments:crossmapping effects.Cognitive Development, 23(1), 191-203. Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory:Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1316-1340. Ortells, J. J., Carmen, N., Dolores, A., Encarna, C., & George, H. (2016).Individual differences in working memory capacity modulates semantic negative priming from single prime words. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1286.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01286 Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks:Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 191-203. Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2009). Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies:Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 272-283. Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). The effect of language on similarity:The use of relational labels improves young children's performance in a mapping task. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds.),Advances in analogy research:Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences (pp. 274-282). Sophia:New Bulgarian University. Rattermann, M. J., Gentner, D., DeLoache, J. (1987, April).Young children's use of relational similarity in a transfer task. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249-273. Schumacher, R. M., & Gentner, D. (1988).Transfer of training as analogical mapping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 18(4), 592-600. Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability.Developmental Science, 10, 104-109. Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 160-177. Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353-378. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. Thibaut, J. P., & French, R. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10-26. Thibaut, J. P., French, R., & Vezneva, M. (2010). Cognitive load and semantic analogies:Searching semantic space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 569-574. Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Duhoux, S., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory:Suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1245-60. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1205-1212. 陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. (2021). 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(5), 619-627. 费广洪, 王淑娟. (2014). 3~11岁儿童类比推理发展的研究. 心理学探新, 34(6), 493-498. 付馨晨, 李晓东. (2017). 认知抑制——问题解决研究的新视角. 心理科学, 40(1), 58-63. 江荣焕, 李晓东. (2017). 比例推理的过度使用及其认知机制:一项发展性的负启动研究. 心理学报, 49(6), 745-758. 李梦文, 王登, 贺雯. (2021). 消极元刻板印象激活对老年人认知表现的影响. 心理科学, 44(2), 384-490. 魏萍, 周晓林. (2005). 从知觉负载理论来理解选择性注意. 心理科学进展, 13(4), 413-420. 谢和平, 安婧, 王福兴. (2017). 多媒体学习中的图文整合:同步化线索和学习者经验的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 82-88. 于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏,…刘静. (2020). 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 385-393. 于晓. (2021). 执行功能对个体类比推理的影响:发展的视角 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学. |
[1] | 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159. |
[2] | 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168. |
[3] | 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175. |
[4] | 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214. |
[5] | 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18. |
[6] | 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102. |
[7] | 彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771. |
[8] | 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780. |
[9] | 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797. |
[10] | 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644. |
[11] | 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496. |
[12] | 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504. |
[13] | 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332. |
[14] | 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218. |
[15] | 李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227. |
|