大学生网络捐助的影响因素:求助者特征的视角

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.05.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往关于捐助的心理学研究主要聚焦于现实环境中的捐助行为，以及捐助者自身特点对捐助的影响，网络环境、求助者特征对捐助影响的研究较少。本研究以大学生为被试，比较不同信息发布者情境中，网络与现实中捐助的意愿，并确定求助者的身份特征和求助信息特征对网络捐助的影响。结果发现，在捐助意愿和捐助金额方面，网络渠道高于现实渠道、熟人发布高于陌生人发布；当求助者与捐助者同为大学生时，捐助者对求助者的理性求助信息比情绪性求助信息有更强的捐助意愿和更多捐助金额。以上结果与大学生网络社会支持水平较高、处理网络信息能力较强有关。

关键词: 大学生, 捐助, 捐助意愿, 网络捐助

Abstract: Researchers tend to concentrate more on donations in the real world and the impact of donors' characteristics on donations. However, few studies have examined willingness to make online donations and the influence of donation recipients' characteristics on such donations. The current study attempted to compare donation willingness in online and real contexts. The effect of donation recipients' identity and help-seeking information characteristics on online donation was also studied. Findings revealed that the participants were more likely to donate online than in the actual environment, and they tended to do so in larger amounts. Further, they were more likely to help acquaintances who posted help-seeking information online than to strangers who did the same. Finally, compared with helping college students who posted emotional information, the student donors were more willing to spend more money to help those who posted rational information. College students' high level of online social support and excellent network information processing ability may have affected these results.

Key words: college student, donation, willingness to donate, online donation

中图分类号:

B844

邱娟, 江黛苔, 段亚杰, 姚驹, 范春艳, 刘伟. 大学生网络捐助的影响因素:求助者特征的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 569-575.

QIU Juan, JIANG Daitai, DUAN Yajie, YAO Ju, FAN Chunyan, LIU Wei. Factors Influencing College Students' Online Donation Behavior: Examining the Impact of the Donation Recipients Characteristics[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 569-575.

参考文献

Basil, D., Ridgway, N., & Basil, M. D. (2010). Guilt appeals:the mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology and Marketing, 23(12), 1035-1054.
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy:Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924-973.
Bennett, R. (2009). Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites. Journal of Consumer Behaviour:An International Research Review, 8(2-3), 116-134.
Castillo, M., Petrie, R., & Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks:A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114(C), 29-35.
Farrelly, D., & Bennett, M. (2018). Empathy leads to increased online charitable behaviour when time is the currency. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 42-46.
Kanter, B., & Fine, A. (2010). The networked nonprofit:Connecting with social media to drive change. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, B. A., & Farrell, C. R. (2003). Buddy, can you spare a dime? Homelesness, panhandling, and the public. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 299-324.
McDonough, M. H., Ullrich-French, S., Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A. J., & Riley, A. (2013). Social responsibility among low-income youth in physical activity-based positive youth development programs:Scale development and associations with social relationships. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25 (4), 431-447.
Meer, J. (2014). Effects of the price of charitable giving:evidence from an online crowdfunding platform. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 103(C), 113-124.
Meiring, L., Subramoney, S., Thomas, K. G., Decety, J., & Fourie, M. M. (2014). Empathy and helping:effects of racial group membership and cognitive load. South African Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 426-438.
Nambisan, P. (2011). Information seeking and social support in online health communities:Impact on patients' perceived empathy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(3), 298-304.
Sanders, M. (2017). Social influences on charitable giving in the workplace. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66(C), 129-136.
Sargeant, A., West, D. C., & Jay, E. (2007). The relational determinants of nonprofit web site fundraising effectiveness:An exploratory study. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(2), 141-156.
Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect:The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850-868.
Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2012). Understanding online donor behavior:the role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(3), 219-230.
Stebbins, E., & Hartman, R. L. (2013). Charity brand personality:can smaller charitable organizations leverage their brand's personality to influence giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 203-215.
Westbury, H. R., & Neumann, D. L. (2008). Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biological Psychology, 78(1), 66-74.
Wiepking, P., & James, R. N. (2013). Why are the oldest old less generous? Explanations for the unexpected age-related drop in charitable giving. Ageing and Society, 33(3), 486-510.
Willer, R., Wimer, C., & Owens, L. A. (2015). What drives the gender gap in charitable giving? Lower empathy leads men to give less to poverty relief. Social Science Research, 52, 83-98.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us:The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 533-549.
陈娟, 李金旭. (2018). "利他"的捐助与"利己"的信息分享——"轻松筹"项目的参与动机研究. 新闻大学, 6, 91-100.
程乐华. (2002). 网络心理行为公开报告. 广州:广东经济出版社.
丁迈, 陈曦. (2009). 网络环境下的利他行为研究. 现代传播-中国传媒大学学报, 3, 35-37.
定险峰, 刘华山. (2011). 个体不幸情境下的慈善捐赠-共情的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 759-762.
国家语言文字委员会和国家标准局. (1992). 现代汉语字频统计表. 北京:语文出版社.
黄少华. (2008). 青少年网络人际信任及其影响因素研究. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 30(1), 152-156.
黄四林, 韩明跃, 宁彩芳, 林崇德. (2016). 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响:自尊的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(6), 684-692.
李京丽. (2016). 网络求助文本的话语研究——对"轻松筹"和"微爱通道"的三个案例分析. 新闻界, 11, 47-53.
林锦秀. (2012). 大学生对他人行为的责任推断与助人行为——群体关系与情感体验作用分析. 上海理工大学学报(社会科学版), 34(4), 304-309.
刘勤为, 徐庆春, 刘华山,刘勤学. (2016). 大学生网络社会支持与网络利他行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 426-434.
马向阳, 徐富明, 吴修良, 潘靖, 李甜. (2012). 说服效应的理论模型、影响因素与应对策略. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 735-744.
任晓明, 高炜, 黄闪闪. (2012). 网络慈善捐助引发的思考. 毕节学院学报(综合版), 30(12), 81-85.
杨欣欣, 刘勤学, 周宗奎. (2017). 大学生网络社会支持对网络利他行为的影响:感恩和社会认同的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 183-190.
袁义达. (2007). 中国姓氏·三百大姓.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
赵欢欢, 张和云. (2013). 大学生网络交往动机与网络利他行为:网络人际信任的中介作用. 心理研究, 6(6), 92-96.
郑显亮. (2013). 现实利他行为与网络利他行为:网络社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 31-37.
周利, 段靓.(2015). 关于大学生对助人冷漠现象的看法调查及分析. 社会心理科学, 30(10), 31-35.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2]	万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3]	张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响：任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[4]	赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[5]	丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[6]	王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[7]	魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[8]	焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[9]	胡心怡, 陈英和. 大学生新目标投入能力、自我损耗与幸福感的关系:生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 348-356.
[10]	谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 胡宇飞, 杨喜兰, 席娟. 脱贫内生动力对贫困大学生学习投入的影响:自我控制的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 386-397.
[11]	赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.
[12]	廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[13]	郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[14]	相硕琪, 李亚丹, 叶超群, 杨伟星, 郭习佩, 张玲玲, 胡卫平. 创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系: 认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 32-41.
[15]	史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed