内隐与外显倾向性道德敏感的关系及其预测源分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以228名大学生为被试, 采用内隐联想测验(IAT)、倾向性道德敏感问卷(MDSQ)以及其它有关量表考察其内隐与外显倾向性道德敏感的关系及其预测变量。结果表明:男生比女生表现出在倾向性道德敏感上更高的内隐效应, 而女生则在外显倾向性道德敏感的移情内疚、移情烦扰等因子上得分高于男生, 在惩罚倾向因子上低于男生;大学生被试的外显、内隐倾向性道德敏感没有显著相关;自我监控、道德态度强度均能在不同程度上预测内隐与外显倾向性道德敏感的关系, 自我监控的预测作用相对较高。

关键词: 倾向性道德敏感, 内隐, 道德态度强度, 自我监控性, 大学生

Abstract: The relationship and the predictors of implicit dispositional moral sensitivity(DMS)and explicit DMS were examined in 228 college students.Implicit Association Test(IAT), Dispositional Moral Sensitivity Questionnaires (DMSQ)and other related scales were adopted.The results showed:Male subjects' implicit dispositional moral sensitivity effects were significantly higher than those of female ones.In explicit dispositional moral sensitivity, female subjects' guilt of empathy, intrusiveness of empathy were significantly higher than those of male ones, and their punitivity were significantly lower than those of male ones.There was not a significant correlation between the implicit and explicit DMS of the surveyed subjects.Both self-monitor and moral at itude strength could predict the disparities between college students' implicit and explicit DMS, and with self-monitor having a relatively higher predictability.

Key words: dispositional moral sensitivity, implicit, moral attitude strength, self-monitor

中图分类号:

B844.2

郑信军, 岑国桢. 内隐与外显倾向性道德敏感的关系及其预测源分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 54-60.

ZHENG Xin-jun, CEN Guo-zhen. A Study on Predictors of the Relationship Between Implicit Dispositional Moral Sensitivity and Explicit Dispositional Moral Sensitivity[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 54-60.

参考文献

[1] Rest J R.Moral development:Advance in research and theory. New York:A division of Greenwood Press.1986:2-18.
[2] Rest J R, Narvaze D, Bebeau M J, Thoma S J.Postconventional moral thinking:aneo Kohlbergian approach.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.1999:101-102.
[3] Sparks J R, Hunt S D.Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation.Journal of M arketing.1998, 62(2):92-109.
[4] Patt erson D M.Causal effects of regulatory, organizational and personal factors on ethical sensitivity.Journal of Business Ethics.2001, 30 (2):123-159.
[5] Schmitt M J.Gollwitzer M, Maes J, et al.Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space.European Journal of Psychological Assessment.2005, 21(3):202-211.
[6] Lutzen K, Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Norberg A.Developing the concept of moral sensitivity in health care practice.Nursing Ethics.2006, 13 (2):187-196.
[7] Greenwald A G, Banaji M R.Implicit social cognition:attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychology Review.1995, 102(1):4-27.
[8] Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz J L K.Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology.1998, 74(6):1464-1480.
[9] Wilson T D, Lindsey S, Schooler T Y.A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review.2000, 107(1):101-126.
[10] Gawronski B, Bodenhausen G V.Associative and propositional processes in evaluation:an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Psychological Bulletin.2006, 132(5):692-731.
[11] 杨治良, 高桦, 郭力平.社会认知具有更强的内隐性——兼论内隐和外显的钢筋水泥关系.心理学报.1998, 30(1):1-6.
[12] 高湘萍, 徐媛, 李冰.品德语词的内隐记忆发展研究初探. 心理科学.2002, 25(5):555-557.
[13] Fazio R H.Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation:A comment on the paper by Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1993, 64(5):753-758.
[14] Fazio R H.Attitudes as object evaluation associations: Consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility.In R.E.Petty&J. A.Krosnick(Eds.), Attitude strength:Ant ecedents and consequences (pp247-282).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.1995.
[15] 吴明证.内隐态度的理论与实验研究.华东师范大学博士学位论文.2004.
[16] Butt erfield K D, Trevino L K, Weaver G R.M oral awareness in business organizations:Influences of issue related and social context f actors. Human Relations, 2000, 53(7):981-1018.
[17] Collins D.The quest to improve the human condition:The first 1500 articles published in journal of business ethics.Journal of Business Ethics.2000, 26(1):1-73.
[18] Simga Mugan C, Daly B A, et al.The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity:An application of the issue contingent model, Journal of Business Ethics.2005, 57(2);139-159.
[19] 郑信军, 岑国桢.大学生倾向性道德敏感的结构研究.心理科学.2008, 31(5):1026-1030.
[20] 柏乔阳.情绪型劳动的影响因素及其与员工心理健康的关系.浙江大学硕士学位论文.2006.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”？高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[5]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[6]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[7]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[8]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[9]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[10]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[11]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[12]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[13]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[14]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[15]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed