心理发展与教育 ›› 2002, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 68-73.

• 心理健康 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生应对策略的特点及其与社会支持水平关系的研究

李伟, 陶沙   

  1. 北京师范大学心理学院教育部“认知科学与学习”重点实验室, 100875
  • 出版日期:2002-07-15 发布日期:2002-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 陶沙(1973- ),女,四川人,现为北京师范大学心理学院副教授.
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究“十五”规划项目(01JCXLX002);教育部人文社会科学研究“九五”规划专项任务资助

Coping Strategies and Perceived Social Support among University Studnets: Its Relationship and Gender Difference

LI Wei, TAO Sha   

  1. School of Psychology, Key Laboratory for Cognitive Science and Learing of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University 100875
  • Online:2002-07-15 Published:2002-07-15

摘要: 以423名大学生为被试,采用问卷法考察了大学生应对策略的特点、性别差异及其与社会支持之间的关系.研究发现:(1)大学生更多地倾向于使用积极解决问题和寻求情感支持的应对策略,而转移注意力和消极解决问题应对策略相对较少;(2)社会支持总体感受水平与积极解决问题和寻求情感支持的应对策略显著正相关,而与消极解决问题和转移注意力的应对策略显著负相关;对男生而言,社会支持感受在积极解决问题应对策略上贡献率相对较大;对女生而言,社会支持感受在寻求情感支持应对策略上贡献率相对较大;(3)不仅不同性别大学生的应对策略存在显著差异,而且不同社会支持感受水平的同性别大学生的应对策略也存在显著差异.男生比女生采取更多的消极解决问题策略,而采取更少的寻求情感支持应对策略;不论男生或女生高社会支持感受组均比低社会支持感受组采用更多的积极解决问题和寻求情感支持的应对策略,而更少的采用转移注意力和消极解决问题的应对策略.

关键词: 大学生, 社会支持感受水平, 应对策略

Abstract: The present study examined the relationship between coping strategies and perceived social support as well as its gender difference in late adolescence by asking 423 university students to fill out questionnaires.The results indicated that (1) Male and female students all resorted more to active-solving problem strategies, while the attention distracting strategies were used fewer and the negative-solving problem strategies were used the fewest.(2) The level of students' perception of social support was positively correlated with active-solving problem and seeking emotional support while being negatively correlated with negative-solving problem and attention distracting coping strategies.The contribution of perceived social support was relatively higher on the seeking emotional support coping for female students while being relatively higher on the active-solving problem coping for male students.(3) The difference of studnets' coping strategies could be found not only between different gender groups, but also between groups with high-level or low-level perceived social support even within the same gender group.Male students reported using significantly more negative-solving problem and fewer seeking emotional support strategies than female.Whether male or female students, those who with higher perceived social support reported more positive-solving problem and seeking emotional support coping strategies while less negative-solving problem and attention distracting coping strategies than those who with lower perceived social support.

Key words: university students, perceived social support, coping strategies

[1] Billings AG, Cronkite RC (1983). Social-environmental factors in unipolar depression: comparisons of depressed patients and nondepressed controls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 92, 119-133.
[2] Heman-staht, Mindy A (1995). APProach and avoidant coping: implications for adolescent mental health. JournaI of Youth and Adolescence. Vol. 24, No. 6, 649-659.
[3] Ebata, A. T. and Moos, R. H (1991). Coping and adjustment in distressed and healthy adolescents. Journal ApPl. Develop. Psychol. Vol. 17, 33-54.
[4] Brian L Ptintz (1999). Stress-buffering factors related to adolescent coping: a path anslysis. Adolescence, Vol. 34, 715-734.
[5] Phelp, S. B., & Jarvis, P A. (1994). Coping in adolescence: empirical evidence for a theoretical framework. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 23, No. 3, 359-366.
[6] Ystgaard. M., Tambs K. Dalgard O. S. (1999). Life stress, social support and psychological distress in late adolescence: a lonsitudinal study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr EPidemiol, Vol. 34, 12-19.
[7] Cutrona, C. E. (1984). Social support and stress in the transition to parenthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 378-390.
[8] 汪向东执行主编(1992),《心理卫生评定手册》,北京医科大学出版社.
[9] Carver, C., Scheier, M., & Weintraub, J. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 56, 405-411.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系:外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3] 张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响:无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4] 何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5] 杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[6] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7] 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[8] 曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[9] 陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[10] 郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[11] 王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12] 朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13] 张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[14] 李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑:反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[15] 蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响:自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!