学习困难和优秀学生延迟满足能力的跨情境比较实验研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2002, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 63-67.

学习困难和优秀学生延迟满足能力的跨情境比较实验研究

刘岩, 张明, 徐国庆

东北师范大学心理学系, 长春130024

出版日期:2002-07-15 发布日期:2002-07-15
作者简介:刘岩(1978- ),女,东北师范大学心理系硕士研究生.
基金资助:
教育部回国留学人员基金的资助

A Comparative Experimental Study on Delay of Gratification between Excellent Learning Students and Students with Learning Disabilities

LIU Yan, ZHANG Ming, XU Guo-qing

Department of Psychology Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024

Online:2002-07-15 Published:2002-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨学习困难学生(学困生)和学习优秀学生(学优生)在三种不同情境下——独自操作、单一团体操作和混合团体操作,延迟满足能力的差异.结果表明:(1)在延迟满足实验中,被试变量(学优生、学困生)与情境变量(独自、单一团体、混合团体)的交互作用显著;(2)在独自操作和单一团体情境下,学优生延迟满足能力显著高于学困生,混合团体则不存在这种差异;(3)学优生的延迟满足能力在独自操作和单一团体时水平较高,而混合团体的成绩则显著的低于单一团体,学困生的延迟满足能力在单一团体和混合团体时水平较高,而单独操作成绩则显著低于混合团体.本研究一方面拓展了对延迟满足能力的群体比较研究,同时,对学困生的心理教育实践也有指导意义.

关键词: 学习困难学生, 学习优秀学生, 延迟满足能力

Abstract: In present study, we compared the delay of gratification in different environments between students with Learning Disabilities (LD) and excellent learning students (ELS).2×3 experimental design were employed in a sample of 107 pupils with LD and ELS from 4 or 5-grade of two primary schools in Changchun.The experimental results showd that the interaction between subjects and environments was significant.Further analysis indicated that delay of gratification in ELS was significantly higher than that of students with LD in environment Ⅰ and environment Ⅱ, but there was not in environment Ⅲ.As for ELS, self-control ability was higher in first two environment than the last, and there was significant difference between environment Ⅱ and environment Ⅲ.As for LDS, the delay of gratification was higher in last two levels, and there was significant difference between environment Ⅰand environment Ⅲ.This study may contribute to both theory construction and practical instruction.

Key words: Learning Disabilities, Excellent Learning Students, Delay of gratification

刘岩, 张明, 徐国庆. 学习困难和优秀学生延迟满足能力的跨情境比较实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 17(3): 63-67.

LIU Yan, ZHANG Ming, XU Guo-qing. A Comparative Experimental Study on Delay of Gratification between Excellent Learning Students and Students with Learning Disabilities[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 17(3): 63-67.

参考文献

[1] Kavale K A., Forness S R.. What Definitions of Learning Disability Say and Don't Say. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000, 33(3), 239-255.
[2] McCall R B., Beach S R., Lau S. The Nature and Correlates of Underachievement among Elementary Schoolchildren in Hong Kong. Child Development, 2000, 71(3), 785-801.
[3] 朱冽烈,许政援,孔瑞芬.学习困难儿童的注意、行为特性及同伴关系的研究.心理科学,2000,23(5),556-559.
[4] Eisenberg N., Guthrie I K., Fabes R A. et al. Prediction of Elementary School Children's Externalizing Problem Behaviors from Attentional and Behavioral Regulation and Negative Emotionality. Child Development, 2000, 71(5), 1367-1382.
[5] Buffer D L.. Promoting Strategic Learning by Postsecondary Students With Leaning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995, 28(3), 170-190.
[6] Mischel W., Shoda Y., Rodriguez M L.. Delay of Grafification in Children. Science, 1989, 255, 933-937.
[7] 黄蕴智.延迟满足—一个值得在我国开展的研究计划心理发展与教育,1999,1,53-56.
[8] 牛卫华,张梅玲.西方有关学习困难问题研究的新进展.心理科学,2000,23(3),357-358.
[9] Cherek D R., Lnae S D. Fenfluramine effects on impulsivityin a sample of adults with and withou thistory of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology, 2000, 152(2), 149-16.
[10] Feist J. (eds.) Theory of Personality(3xd) USA: Harcourt Brace College, 1994, 455-466.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed