智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响——变量中心和个体中心分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.05.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响，采用智力和人格内隐观问卷、简易应对方式问卷和抑郁量表对624名大学生进行测查。结果如下：（1）变量中心的分析结果表明，整体上大学生智力和人格内隐观仅对积极应对的预测作用显著。（2）为考察智力和人格内隐观在大学生群体中的组合类型，采用个体中心的分析思路对智力和人格内隐观得分进行潜在剖面分析，可将大学生的内隐观划分为四种类型：智力/人格固存观型、智力/人格内隐观适中型、智力增长观/人格可塑观型、智力固存观/人格可塑观型。四类大学生在智力内隐观上的得分两两差异显著；除智力增长观/人格可塑观型与智力固存观/人格可塑观型外，四类大学生在人格内隐观上的得分也两两差异显著。（3）智力增长观/人格可塑观型大学生的积极应对得分显著高于其他三类大学生，而消极应对和抑郁显著低于其他三类大学生；智力固存观/人格可塑观型大学生的消极应对和抑郁显著高于其他三类大学生。

关键词: 智力内隐观, 人格内隐观, 应对方式, 抑郁, 大学生

Abstract: The present study aimed at exploring the influence of college students' intelligence and personality implicit theories on coping style and depression. 624 college students completed Theories of Intelligence and Personality Questionnaire, Coping Style Questionnaire and CES-D Scale. The results were as follows:(1) Variable-oriented analyses revealed that college students' implicit theories of intelligence and personality predicted positive coping style significantly. (2) Person-oriented analyses revealed that college students could be divided into four types according to implicit theories by Latent Profile Analysis. The four types were named as entity intelligence and personality theory type, moderate intelligence and personality theory type, incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type, and entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type separately. The four groups exhibited significant difference on scores of intelligence implicit theories. The four groups also exhibited significant difference on scores of personality implicit theories, except the difference between incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type and entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type. (3) College students with incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type exhibited significantly higher positive coping style and significantly lower negative coping style and depression than the other three types. Students with entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type exhibited significantly higher negative coping style and depression than the other three types.

Key words: implicit theory of intelligence, implicit theory of personality, coping style, depression, college students

中图分类号:

B844

胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响——变量中心和个体中心分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 586-594.

HU Xinyi, CHEN Yinghe. The Influence of Intelligence and Personality Implicit Theories on College Students' Coping Styles and Depression: Variable-oriented and Person-oriented Analyses[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 586-594.

参考文献

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood:What is it, and what is it good for? Child development perspectives, 1(2), 68-73.
Blackwell, L.,Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition:A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter:A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701.
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(3), 538-549.
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19-30.
Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement:A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Dweck,C.S. (2000). Self-theories:Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis Group.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset:The new psychology of success. New York:Random House.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391-394.
Dweck,C.S. (2013). Self-theories:Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York:Taylor & Francis Group.
Heyman, G. D., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Children's thinking about traits:Implications for judgments of the self and others. Child development, 69(2), 391-403.
Kammrath, L. K., & Peetz, J. (2012). You promised you'd change:How incremental and entity theorists react to a romantic partner's promised change attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 570-574.
Little, B. R., Salmela-Aro, K. E., & Phillips, S. D. (2007). Personal project pursuit:Goals, action, and human flourishing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus version 6:Base program and combination add-on. Los Angeles, CA:Muthen & Muthen,197-200.
Niiya, Y., Brook, A. T., & Crocker, J. (2010). Contingent self-worth and self-handicapping:Do incremental theorists protect self-esteem?. Self and Identity, 9(3), 276-297.
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation:Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34(5), 599-612.
Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role ofimplicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952-959.
Romero,C.,Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school:The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14(2), 227-234.
Rudolph, K. D. (2010). Implicit theories of peer relationships. Social Development, 19(1), 113-129.
Ryazanov, A. A., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2018). Incremental mindsets and the reduced forgiveness of chronic failures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76(1), 33-41.
Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood A 10-year follow up. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 690-715.
Salmela-Aro, K., Read, S., Korhonen, T., Vuoksimaa, E., Rose, R. J., & Kaprio, J. (2012). Young adults' developmental task-related goals modify the association between self-focused goals and depressive symptoms. Applied Psychology:Health and Well-Being, 4(1), 106-125.
Schleider, J. L., Abel, M. R., & Weisz, J. R. (2015). Implicit theories and youth mental health problems:A random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 35(1), 1-9.
Schroder,H. S.,Dawood S.,Yalch M. M.,Donnellan M. B. & Moser,J. S. (2014). The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students. Cognitive Therapy and Research,39(2),120-139.
Shih, S. S. (2011). Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and Taiwanese Eighth-grade students' academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 131-142.
Smith, M., Wethington, E., & Zhan, G. (1996). Self-concept clarity and preferred coping styles. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 407-434.
Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters:The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230.
Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change:Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 867.
Yeager, D. S., Lee, H. Y., & Jamieson, J. P. (2016). How to improve adolescent stress responses insights from integrating implicit theories of personality and biopsychosocial models. Psychological science, 27(8), 1078-1091.
陈武, 李董平, 鲍振宙, 闫昱文, 周宗奎. (2015). 亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学报, 47(5), 611-623.
成子娟,侯杰泰.(2002).相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性.心理学报, 34(1),81-88.
李启明, 陈志霞. (2015). 大五人格5个维度及10个面的发展水平——基于我国 15~75 岁横断样本调查. 心理科学, 38(1), 131-138.
解亚宁. (1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 6(2), 114-115.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘.(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
徐海玲. (2007). 自我概念清晰性和个体心理调适的关系. 心理科学, 30(1),96-99.
袁晓娇, 方晓义, 刘杨, 蔺秀云. (2012). 流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感, 社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 28(3), 54-59.
张洁婷, 焦璨, 张敏强. (2010). 潜在类别分析技术在心理学研究中的应用. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1991-1998.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,12(6),942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[3]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[4]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[5]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	何灿, 魏华, 丁倩, 桂勇. 父母工作性通信工具使用对粗暴养育的影响:焦虑抑郁的中介作用与主管支持感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 903-912.
[8]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[9]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[10]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[11]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[12]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[13]	李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[14]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[15]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed