智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响——变量中心和个体中心分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.05.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响，采用智力和人格内隐观问卷、简易应对方式问卷和抑郁量表对624名大学生进行测查。结果如下：（1）变量中心的分析结果表明，整体上大学生智力和人格内隐观仅对积极应对的预测作用显著。（2）为考察智力和人格内隐观在大学生群体中的组合类型，采用个体中心的分析思路对智力和人格内隐观得分进行潜在剖面分析，可将大学生的内隐观划分为四种类型：智力/人格固存观型、智力/人格内隐观适中型、智力增长观/人格可塑观型、智力固存观/人格可塑观型。四类大学生在智力内隐观上的得分两两差异显著；除智力增长观/人格可塑观型与智力固存观/人格可塑观型外，四类大学生在人格内隐观上的得分也两两差异显著。（3）智力增长观/人格可塑观型大学生的积极应对得分显著高于其他三类大学生，而消极应对和抑郁显著低于其他三类大学生；智力固存观/人格可塑观型大学生的消极应对和抑郁显著高于其他三类大学生。

关键词: 智力内隐观, 人格内隐观, 应对方式, 抑郁, 大学生

Abstract: The present study aimed at exploring the influence of college students' intelligence and personality implicit theories on coping style and depression. 624 college students completed Theories of Intelligence and Personality Questionnaire, Coping Style Questionnaire and CES-D Scale. The results were as follows:(1) Variable-oriented analyses revealed that college students' implicit theories of intelligence and personality predicted positive coping style significantly. (2) Person-oriented analyses revealed that college students could be divided into four types according to implicit theories by Latent Profile Analysis. The four types were named as entity intelligence and personality theory type, moderate intelligence and personality theory type, incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type, and entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type separately. The four groups exhibited significant difference on scores of intelligence implicit theories. The four groups also exhibited significant difference on scores of personality implicit theories, except the difference between incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type and entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type. (3) College students with incremental intelligence/malleable personality theory type exhibited significantly higher positive coping style and significantly lower negative coping style and depression than the other three types. Students with entity intelligence/malleable personality theory type exhibited significantly higher negative coping style and depression than the other three types.

Key words: implicit theory of intelligence, implicit theory of personality, coping style, depression, college students

中图分类号:

B844

胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响——变量中心和个体中心分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 586-594.

HU Xinyi, CHEN Yinghe. The Influence of Intelligence and Personality Implicit Theories on College Students' Coping Styles and Depression: Variable-oriented and Person-oriented Analyses[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 586-594.

参考文献

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood:What is it, and what is it good for? Child development perspectives, 1(2), 68-73.
Blackwell, L.,Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition:A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter:A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701.
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(3), 538-549.
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19-30.
Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement:A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Dweck,C.S. (2000). Self-theories:Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis Group.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset:The new psychology of success. New York:Random House.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391-394.
Dweck,C.S. (2013). Self-theories:Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York:Taylor & Francis Group.
Heyman, G. D., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Children's thinking about traits:Implications for judgments of the self and others. Child development, 69(2), 391-403.
Kammrath, L. K., & Peetz, J. (2012). You promised you'd change:How incremental and entity theorists react to a romantic partner's promised change attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 570-574.
Little, B. R., Salmela-Aro, K. E., & Phillips, S. D. (2007). Personal project pursuit:Goals, action, and human flourishing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus version 6:Base program and combination add-on. Los Angeles, CA:Muthen & Muthen,197-200.
Niiya, Y., Brook, A. T., & Crocker, J. (2010). Contingent self-worth and self-handicapping:Do incremental theorists protect self-esteem?. Self and Identity, 9(3), 276-297.
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation:Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34(5), 599-612.
Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role ofimplicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952-959.
Romero,C.,Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school:The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14(2), 227-234.
Rudolph, K. D. (2010). Implicit theories of peer relationships. Social Development, 19(1), 113-129.
Ryazanov, A. A., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2018). Incremental mindsets and the reduced forgiveness of chronic failures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76(1), 33-41.
Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood A 10-year follow up. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 690-715.
Salmela-Aro, K., Read, S., Korhonen, T., Vuoksimaa, E., Rose, R. J., & Kaprio, J. (2012). Young adults' developmental task-related goals modify the association between self-focused goals and depressive symptoms. Applied Psychology:Health and Well-Being, 4(1), 106-125.
Schleider, J. L., Abel, M. R., & Weisz, J. R. (2015). Implicit theories and youth mental health problems:A random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 35(1), 1-9.
Schroder,H. S.,Dawood S.,Yalch M. M.,Donnellan M. B. & Moser,J. S. (2014). The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students. Cognitive Therapy and Research,39(2),120-139.
Shih, S. S. (2011). Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and Taiwanese Eighth-grade students' academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 131-142.
Smith, M., Wethington, E., & Zhan, G. (1996). Self-concept clarity and preferred coping styles. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 407-434.
Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters:The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230.
Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change:Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 867.
Yeager, D. S., Lee, H. Y., & Jamieson, J. P. (2016). How to improve adolescent stress responses insights from integrating implicit theories of personality and biopsychosocial models. Psychological science, 27(8), 1078-1091.
陈武, 李董平, 鲍振宙, 闫昱文, 周宗奎. (2015). 亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学报, 47(5), 611-623.
成子娟,侯杰泰.(2002).相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性.心理学报, 34(1),81-88.
李启明, 陈志霞. (2015). 大五人格5个维度及10个面的发展水平——基于我国 15~75 岁横断样本调查. 心理科学, 38(1), 131-138.
解亚宁. (1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 6(2), 114-115.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘.(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
徐海玲. (2007). 自我概念清晰性和个体心理调适的关系. 心理科学, 30(1),96-99.
袁晓娇, 方晓义, 刘杨, 蔺秀云. (2012). 流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感, 社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 28(3), 54-59.
张洁婷, 焦璨, 张敏强. (2010). 潜在类别分析技术在心理学研究中的应用. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1991-1998.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,12(6),942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2]	万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3]	张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响：任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[4]	赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[5]	丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[6]	王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[7]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[8]	郑天鹏, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 袁柯曼, 边玉芳. 父母温暖教养的亲子感知差异与儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 869-880.
[9]	张明浩, 王俊儒, 王艳, 杨照黎, 张艳芳, 娄慧琳, 徐晓惠, 徐敏. 生命早期环境不可预测性对初中生抑郁的影响:生命史策略和资源控制策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 881-891.
[10]	张珊珊, 吴佳钰, 王泓懿, 刘致宏. 线上真实自我呈现与高中生抑郁的纵向联系:归属需求的中介作用和人际敏感性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 903-912.
[11]	魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[12]	汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[13]	叶文婷, 滕召军, 黎杨杨, 崔宏晶, 聂倩. 父母心理控制、高中生抑郁症状及其生命意义感的纵向关系:一项交叉滞后模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 710-719.
[14]	焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[15]	何婷婷, 荣璠, 李书琴, 万宇辉. 医学生健康危险行为与抑郁症状的关联:一项潜在转变分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 730-739.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed