同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究使用问卷法,以自我报告和同伴提名相结合的方式对青少年的同伴侵害、攻击行为、同伴接纳和抑郁进行测量,考察同伴侵害对青少年抑郁的预测作用以及班级攻击规范凸显性对上述关系的调节作用。多层线性分析的结果表明:(1)在个体水平上控制了性别因素后,同伴侵害可显著正向预测青少年抑郁水平;(2)在班级水平上控制了年级、班级人数、班级性别比后,班级攻击规范凸显性可显著调节同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系。具体表现为,在对攻击行为接纳程度(即班级攻击规范凸显性)较低的班级,同伴侵害对青少年抑郁水平的正向预测作用更强。研究结果在一定程度上扩展了“健康环境悖论”的内涵,对校园欺凌的预防与干预有一定的启示意义。

关键词: 青少年, 同伴侵害, 抑郁, 班级攻击规范凸显性, 健康环境悖论

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to explore the moderating role of classroom norm salience for aggression in the links between peer victimization and adolescents' depression. Data on peer victimization, peer acceptance and depression were obtained from peer nominations and self-reports. Results of multilevel linear analysis indicated that: (1) Peer victimization was positively associated with depression after controlling for the effect of gender; (2) Classroom norm salience for aggression could moderate the relationship between peer victimization and depression after controlling for the effects of grade, classroom size and the gender ratio in the classroom. Specifically, peer victimization was more strongly associated with depression in classrooms where aggressive behaviors were less accepted by peers. The results were in accordance with the hypothesis of “healthy context paradox” and provided some insights for the prevention and intervention of school bullying in future.

Key words: adolescents, peer victimization, depression, classroom norm salience for aggression, healthy context paradox

中图分类号:

B844

胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.

HU Yihao, XU Luyan, BIAN Xiaohua, ZHOU Ying, LIU Junsheng. Peer Victimization and Depression among Chinese Adolescents: The Moderating Effects of Classroom Norm Salience for Aggression[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.

参考文献

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2010). The psychological impact of peer victimization: Exploring social-cognitive mediators of depression. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 615-623.
Blakemore, S., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 187-207.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480.
Chen, X., Cen, G., Li, D., & He, Y. (2005). Socialfunctioning and adjustment in chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76(1), 182-195.
Chen, X., & Tse, H. C. H. (2010). Social and psychological adjustment of Chinese Canadian children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(4), 330-338.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Decreases in the proportion of bullying victims in the classroom: Effects on the adjustment of remaining victims.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 64-72.
Garandeau, C. F., Vermande, M. M., Reijntjes, A. H. A., & Aarts, E. (2019). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 401-410.
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world.Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549-576.
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twentyyears' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455.
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000).Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.
Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Managing threat: Do social-cognitive processes mediate the link between peer victimization and adjustment problems in early adolescence? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(3), 525-540.
Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). “It must be me” or “It could be them?”: The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims' adjustment.Social Networks, 34(4), 379-386.
Ju, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Developmental trajectories and longitudinal mediation effects of self-esteem, peer attachment, child maltreatment and depression on early adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 353-363.
Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I. P., Koukoutsis, N. D., & Markos, A. (2016). Peer victimization and depression in Greek preadolescents: Personality and attachment as moderators.Personal Relationships, 23(2), 280-295.
Kovacs, M. (1992).The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: Differential pathways for children's school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 826-841.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88(4), 1265-1283.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Mainhard, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2021a). The role of aggressive peer norms in elementary school children's perceptions of classroom peer climate and school adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1582-1600.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Mainhard, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2021b). The role of defending norms in victims' classroom climate perceptions and psychosocial maladjustment in secondary school. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(2), 169-184.
Liu, J., Chen, X., Li, D., & French, D. (2012). Shyness-sensitivity, aggression, and adjustment in urban chinese adolescents at different historical times. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 393-399.
Llewellyn, N., & Rudolph, K. D. (2014). Individual andsex differences in the consequences of victimization: Moderation by approach and avoidance motivation. Developmental Psychology, 50(9), 2210-2220.
McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. The American Psychologist, 70(4), 300-310.
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76.
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., Barhight, L. J., & Thomson, A. K. (2014). Fifth-grade children's daily experiences of peer victimization and negative emotions: Moderating effects of sex and peer rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(7), 1089-1102.
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., & Sharp, M. K. (2019). Preadolescents' daily peer victimization and perceived social competence: Moderating effects of classroom aggression.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(5), 716-727.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012).Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2016). Popularity andsocial preference in chinese adolescents: Associations with social and behavioral adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828-845.
Pan, B., Li, T., Ji, L., Malamut, S., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Why does Classroom‐Level victimization moderate the association between victimization and depressive symptoms? The “Healthy context paradox” and two explanations. Child Development, 92(5), 1836-1854.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling.Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112.
Pouwels, J. L., van Noorden, T. H. J., & Caravita, S. C. S. (2019). Defending victims of bullying in the classroom: The role of moral responsibility and social costs.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84,103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103831
Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
Saarento, S., Kärnä, A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Student-, classroom-, and school-level risk factors for victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 51(3), 421-434.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120.
Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peervictimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 67-72.
Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2015). Theeffects of school-level victimization on self-blame: Evidence for contextualized social cognitions. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 841-847.
Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates ofvictimization in chinese children's peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 520-532.
Shin, H. (2017). Examining early adolescents' peer climate using descriptive and status norms on academic engagement and aggressive behavior in the classroom.Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(3), 309-320.
Terry, R., & Coie, J. D. (1991). Acomparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 867-880.
Twenge, J. M., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort differences on the children's depression inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 578-588.
Ulman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.),Using multivariate statistics (6th ed., pp. 681-785). Pearson Education.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying.Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483
van den Berg, Yvonne H.M, Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78-95.
Wang, M., L. Degol, J., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children's academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Developmental Review, 57, 2-21.
Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Socialstatus in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social “misfit”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 523-536.
Yun, H. Y., & Juvonen, J. (2020). Navigating the healthy context paradox: Identifying classroom characteristics that improve the psychological adjustment of bullying victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2203-2213.
Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on bullying in mainland China. In P. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 113-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, X., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics oflikability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568-1581.
曾欣然, 汪玥, 丁俊浩, 周晖. (2019). 班级欺凌规范与欺凌行为:群体害怕与同辈压力的中介作用. 心理学报, 51(08), 935-944.
侯金芹, 陈祉妍. (2016). 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素. 心理学报, 48(08), 957-968.
刘晓薇, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 张文新, Salmivalli, C. (2021). 班级环境如何影响受欺负者的适应?健康环境悖论及其发生机制. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 298-304.
刘洋, 张伟波, 葛聪聪, 张琼, 杨莉, 朱丽娜, 蔡军. (2018). 2015 年上海市初中生焦虑抑郁情绪现状调查. 中国健康教育, 34(04), 299-303.
吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, ··· 张卫. (2021). 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 249-256.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[7]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8]	何灿, 魏华, 丁倩, 桂勇. 父母工作性通信工具使用对粗暴养育的影响:焦虑抑郁的中介作用与主管支持感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 903-912.
[9]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[10]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[11]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[12]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[13]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[14]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[15]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.