知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.06.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为厘清知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制，本研究构建了有调节的中介模型。采用知识验证信念量表、主题知识问卷和阅读策略量表，对于173名大学生进行调查，并要求其在多文本阅读理解之后进行开放问题回答。结果显示：精致化策略和信息收集策略在知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响中起部分中介作用；知识验证信念对于精致化策略的预测作用受到主题知识的调节。该结果不但展示了知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的间接影响机制，也提示了主题知识的作用在于提供了选择复杂策略的自由。

关键词: 知识验证信念, 多文本阅读理解, 阅读策略, 主题知识, 大学生

Abstract: In order to clarify the specific mechanism underlying the relationship between justification belief and multiple-text comprehension, this study conducted a moderated mediation model in a sample of 173 undergraduate students. Participants' justification belief, topic knowledge, and reading strategies were measured. In addition, they were required to answer three related open-ended questions directly after reading five conflict texts on cellphone radiation. Results showed that: (1) justification belief had positive indirect effects on multiple-text comprehension separately through accumulation strategy and elaboration strategy; (2) the relationship between justification belief and elaboration strtegy was moderated by topic knowledge. Our findings identified the underlying mechanisms of justification belief on multiple-text comprehension, and further s suggested that topic knowledge play an important role in using complicated strategies.

Key words: justification belief, multiple-text comprehension, mediator, moderator, undergraduates

中图分类号:

G442

林文毅, 杨怡, 余圣陶. 知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.

LIN Wenyi, YANG Yi, YU Shengtao. Justification Belief on Multiple-text Comprehension:Mediation of Reading Strategies and Moderation of Topic Knowledge[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.

参考文献

Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text:A multidimensional and developmental perspective.Handbook of reading research, 3(1), 285-310.
Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension.Learning and Instruction, 30, 9-24.
Braasch, J. L., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Incremental theories of intelligence predict multiple document comprehension.Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 11-20.
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., &Amnarkrud, Ø. (2013). Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension. European Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 879-902.
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue:Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 58-85.
Bråten, I., Gil, L., Strømsø, H. I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2009). Personal epistemology across cultures:Exploring Norwegian and Spanish university students' epistemic beliefs about climate change.Social Psychology of Education, 12(4), 529-560.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010a). When law students read multiple documents about global warming:Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38, 635-657.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010b). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change.Discourse Processes, 47, 1-31.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 111-130.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmeron, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180-192.
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents:Component skills and their acquisition. Enhancing the quality of learning:Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes, 276-314.
Britt, M.A., Rouet, J.F., & Braasch, J.L.G. (2013). Documents as entities:Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M.A. Britt, S.R. Goldman, & J.F. Rouet (Eds.),Reading:From words to multiple texts (pp. 160-179). New York:Routledge.
De La Paz, S., & Wissinger, D. R. (2015). Effects of genre and content knowledge on historical thinking with academically diverse high school students.The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 110-129.
Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents:Examining the role of conflict.International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 100-114.
Hayes, Andrew F.(2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis:A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY:The Guilford Press. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Kendeou, P., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2016). Optimizing conditions for learning:situating refutations in epistemic cognition.The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 245-263.
List, A. (2018). Strategies for comprehending and integrating texts and videos.Learning and Instruction, 57, 34-46.
Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information.Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151-175.
Mason, L., Scrimin, S., Zaccoletti, S., Tornatora, M. C., & Goetz, T. (2018). Webpage reading:Psychophysiological correlates of emotional arousal and regulation predict multiple-text comprehension.Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 317-326.
Nadi, M., Moshfeghi, N., & Amini, M. (2018). Exploratory Relationship between Epistemological Beliefs and Self-directed Learning among Nursing Students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 18, 12-24.
Naumann, A. B., Wechsung, I., & Krems, J. F. (2009). How to support learning from multiple hypertext sources.Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 639-646.
Pamuk, S., Sungur, S., & Oztekin, C. (2017). A Multilevel Analysis of Students' Science Achievements in Relation to their Self-Regulation, Epistemological Beliefs, Learning Environment Perceptions, and Teachers' Personal Characteristics.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-18.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information:A two-step model of validation.Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148-166.
Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history:Effects of discipline expertise.Cognition and instruction, 15(1), 85-106.
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple-text comprehension among upper secondary students.Educational Psychology, 29, 425-445.
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of Internet-based learning.Metacognition and Learning, 4, 91-111.
Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding.Learning and Instruction, 18, 513-527.
Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change:The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192-204.
Sullivan, S., & Puntambekar, S. (2019). Learning with multiple online texts as part of scientific inquiry in the classroom. Computers & Education, 128, 36-51.
Yang, F. Y. (2017). Examining the reasoning of conflicting science information from the information processing perspective-an eye movement analysis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1347-1372.
林文毅. (2018). 篇章阅读新进展——多文本阅读理解本质特征分析. 应用心理学, 24(3), 280-288.
林文毅. (2020). 多文本阅读理解中的认识论信念——实证进展及理论争议. 心理科学,43(4), 821-827.
林文毅, 张静, 徐强. (2017). 从一般领域到特殊主题:认识论信念的层次之分. 心理学探新, 37(5), 387-391.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[6]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[8]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[9]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[10]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[11]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[14]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[15]	蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed