心理发展与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 549-556.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.05.05

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母物质主义与大学生网络强迫性购物:序列中介效应分析

丁倩1,2, 孔令龙1, 张永欣1,2, 周宗奎2   

  1. 1. 信阳师范学院教育科学学院, 信阳 464000;
    2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2019-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 张永欣,Email:yongxin1207@163.com E-mail:yongxin1207@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2018CJY037)阶段性成果;河南省高等学校哲学社会科学创新团队支持计划(2018-CXTD-04);信阳师范学院“南湖学者奖励计划”青年项目资助;青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室开放课题(2018A03)。

Parental Materialism and College Students' Online Compulsive Buying: A Serial Mediating Effect Analysis

DING Qian1,2, KONG Linglong1, ZHANG Yongxin1,2, ZHOU Zongkui2   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000;
    2. Key laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2019-09-30

摘要: 本研究基于生命历程范式,探讨父母物质主义与大学生网络强迫性购物的关系,并在此基础上建构了一个序列中介效应模型,考察大学生物质主义和社会比较的中介作用。采用方便抽样法对武汉市一所综合性大学858名具有网络购物经验的学生进行问卷调查,结果显示:(1)父母物质主义、大学生物质主义、社会比较和网络强迫性购物两两显著正相关;(2)在控制了性别和家庭社会经济地位之后,父母物质主义对大学生网络强迫性购物具有显著正向预测作用;(3)大学生物质主义和社会比较在父母物质主义与大学生网络强迫性购物之间起中介作用。具体而言,父母物质主义通过两条路径影响大学生网络强迫性购物,一是大学生物质主义的单独中介作用;二是大学生物质主义和社会比较的序列中介作用。上述结果表明,父母物质主义对大学生网络强迫性购物具有一定影响,且这种影响是通过个体因素(物质主义)和同伴互动因素(社会比较)共同作用形成的。

关键词: 生命历程范式, 物质主义, 社会比较, 网络强迫性购物, 大学生

Abstract: Based on the life course paradigm, the present study aimed to explore the effect of parental materialism on college students' online compulsive buying and the mediating role of college students' materialism and social comparison. A sample of 858 college students who had online buying experience from a comprehensive university in Wuhan were recruited to complete questionnaires regarding parental materialism, their own materialism, social comparison and online compulsive buying. Results indicated that:(1) There were significant correlations among parental materialism, college students' materialism, social comparison and online compulsive buying. (2) At the control of gender and socioeconomic status, parental materialism could predict college students' online compulsive buying. (3) College students' materialism and social comparison played mediating roles between parental materialism and their online compulsive buying. In particular, parental materialism affected college students' online compulsive buying through two paths:the separate mediation effect of college students' materialism, and the serial mediation effect of their materialism and social comparison. These findings suggest that parental materialism has a certain influence on college students' online compulsive buying, and this influence is formed through the joint effect of individual factors (e.g. materialism) and peer interaction factors (e.g. social comparison).

Key words: life course paradigm, materialism, social comparison, online compulsive buying, college students

Ahuvia, A. C., & Wong, N. Y. (2002). Personality and values based materialism:Their relationship and origins. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 389-402.
Baker, A., Mathur, A., Fatt, C. K., Moschis, G. P., & Rigdon, E. E. (2013). Using the life course paradigm to explain mechanisms that link family disruptions to compulsive buying. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 47(2), 263-288.
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being:A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348-370.
Chan, T. K., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, Z. W. (2017). The state of online impulse-buying research:A literature analysis. Information & Management, 54(2), 204-217.
Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(2), 213-228.
Chen, W., Niu, G. F., Zhang, D. J., Fan, C. Y., Tian, Y., & Zhou, Z. K. (2016). Socioeconomic status and life satisfaction in Chinese adolescents:Analysis of self-esteem as a mediator and optimism as a moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 105-109.
Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents:The who health behaviour in school-aged children survey. Health Education Research, 12(3), 385-397.
Dittmar, H., Long, K., & Bond, R. (2007). When a better self is only a button click away:Associations between materialistic values, emotional and identity-related buying motives, and compulsive buying tendency online. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 334-361.
Edwards, E. A. (1992). The measurement and modeling of compulsive consumer buying behavior (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan.
Eisenberg, N., & Valiente, C. (2002). Parenting and children's prosocial and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 4, (pp. 111-142). Mahwah, NJ US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55-77.
Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bamossy, G. (2003). Understanding materialism among youth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 278-288.
Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877-902.
Grougiou, V., Moschis, G., & Kapoutsis, I. (2015). Compulsive buying:The role of earlier-in-life events and experiences. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 278-289.
Grusec, J. E. (2002). Parenting socialization and children's acquisition of values. In M. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 5 (pp. 143-167). Mahwah, NJ US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Grusec, J. E. (2012). Socialization and the role of power assertion. Human Development, 55(2), 52-56.
Grusec, J. E. (2011). Socialization processes in the family:Social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 243-269.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York:Guilford Press.
Ku, L., Dittmar, H., & Banerjee, R. (2014). To have or to learn? The effects of materialism on British and Chinese children's learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 803-821.
Mattos, C. N. D., Kim, H. S., Requião, M. G., Marasaldi, R. F., Filomensky, T. Z., Hodgins, D. C., et al. (2016). Gender differences in compulsive buying disorder:Assessment of demographic and psychiatric co-morbidities. Plos One, 11(12), e0167365.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather:Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444.
Moschis, G. P. (2007). Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 295-307.
Moschis, G. P., Mathur, A., Fatt, C. K., & Pizzutti, C. (2013). Effects of family structure on materialism and compulsive consumption:A life course study in Brazil. Journal of Research for Consumers, 23(4), 66-96.
Oterolópez, J. M., & Villardefrancos, E. (2014). Prevalence, sociodemographic factors, psychological distress, and coping strategies related to compulsive buying:A cross sectional study in Galicia, Spain. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1-12.
Ozen, H., & Engizek, N. (2014). Shopping online without thinking:Being emotional or rational? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(1), 78-93.
Ozimek, P., & Förster, J. (2017). The impact of self-regulatory states and traits on Facebook use:Priming materialism and social comparisons. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 418-427.
Richins, M. L., & Chaplin, L. N. (2015). Material parenting:How the use of goods in parenting fosters materialism in the next generation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1333-1357.
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement:Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316.
Sacerdote, B. (2014). Experimental and quasi-experimental analysis of peer effects:Two steps forward? Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 253-272.
Schor, J. B. (1998). The overspent American:Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer, New York:Basic Books.
Sharif, S. P., & Khanekharab, J. (2017). Identity confusion and materialism mediate the relationship between excessive social network site usage and online compulsive buying. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 20(8), 494-500.
Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being:It's not the money, it's the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 959-971.
Sun, T., & Wu, G. (2011). Trait predictors of online impulsive buying tendency:A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 19(3), 337-346.
Trotzke, P., Starcke, K., Müller, A., & Brand, M. (2015). Pathological buying online as a specific form of internet addiction:A model-based experimental investigation. Plos One, 10(10), e0140296.
Verhagen, T., & Dolen, W. V. (2011). The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying:A model and empirical application. Information & Management, 48(8), 320-327.
Weaver, S. T., Moschis, G. P., & Davis, T. (2011). Antecedents of materialism and compulsive buying:A life course study in Australia. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(4), 247-256.
程诚. (2015). 大学生消费的同群效应. 青年研究, (2), 1-9.
段新焕, 石艳彩, 张积家. (2007). 强迫购物症研究综述. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(2), 135-138.
古典, 王卓, 蒋奖. (2016).物质主义与礼品类型偏好的关系:社会比较的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 554-557.
贺和平. (2013). 网络强迫性购买行为研究脉络梳理及未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 35(1), 21-28.
蒋奖, 曾陶然, 杨淇越, 于方静. (2016). 青少年物质主义的成因、测量与干预. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1266-1278.
李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强. (2016). 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(12), 1519-1537.
李静, 曹琴, 胡小勇, 郭永玉. (2016). 物质主义对大学生网络强迫性购买的影响:自我控制的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(2), 338-340.
马红宇, 谢菊兰, 唐汉瑛, 申传刚, 张晓翔. (2016). 工作性通信工具使用与双职工夫妻的幸福感:基于溢出-交叉效应的分析. 心理学报,48(1), 48-58.
王春晓, 朱虹. (2016). 地位焦虑、物质主义与炫耀性消费——中国人物质主义倾向的现状、前因及后果. 北京社会科学, (5), 31-40.
王洁, 陈健芷, 高爽. (2014). 从物质主义价值观视角看强迫性购物:一项元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 451-456.
曾欣虹, 陈飞. (2015). 大学生网络强迫性购物的调查研究. 福建师大福清分校学报, (1), 66-73.
赵占波, 杜晓梦, 陈凯. (2014). 网络强迫性购买倾向的影响机制及应对措施研究. 管理评论, 26(4), 130-141.
中国互联网络信息中心. (2017).第40次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 引自http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201708/P020170807351923262153.pdf.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[1] 刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2] 万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响:任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[5] 赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[6] 丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[7] 王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[8] 魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[9] 焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[10] 胡心怡, 陈英和. 大学生新目标投入能力、自我损耗与幸福感的关系:生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 348-356.
[11] 谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 胡宇飞, 杨喜兰, 席娟. 脱贫内生动力对贫困大学生学习投入的影响:自我控制的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 386-397.
[12] 赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.
[13] 廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[14] 郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[15] 相硕琪, 李亚丹, 叶超群, 杨伟星, 郭习佩, 张玲玲, 胡卫平. 创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系: 认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 32-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!