内隐职业性别刻板印象、信息完整性对大学生职业决策过程的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.03.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用内隐联想测验对150名大学生进行分组，选出高、低职业性别刻板印象组被试共74名（各37名），运用信息板技术深入考察内隐职业性别刻板印象、信息完整性对个体职业决策过程的具体影响。结果表明：（1）内隐职业性别刻板印象显著影响个体职业决策的决策时间、探索深度以及探索模式；（2）信息完整性对个体职业决策的信息探索深度、探索模式以及决策满意度有显著影响，且高内隐职业性别刻板印象个体的决策满意度随信息完整性的减少而降低；（3）高内隐职业性别刻板印象的个体在信息不完整的情况下会倾向于进行更深入的信息探索。

关键词: 职业决策, 内隐职业性别刻板印象, 信息完整性, 大学生

Abstract: This study was to explore the impact of implicit career-gender stereotype and information integrity on individual career-making process in college with Information Display Board (IDB) technique. 74 participants were selected from 150 college students by Implicit Association Test, including 37 participants with high career-gender stereotype and 37 participants with low career-gender stereotype. The results were as follows:1) implicit career-gender stereotype showed significant influences on the descsion making time, depth of search and searching model of career decision-making; 2) information integrity constrained the depth of search, searching model and decision satisfaction, and the decision satisfaction of high career-gender stereotype participants will reduce when the information integrity was decreased; 3) for students with high career-gender stereotype, low information integrity can enhance them with deeper information searching.

Key words: career decision making, implicit career-gender stereotype, information integrity, college students

中图分类号:

B844

冷静, 刘伟臻, 侯东敏, 司继伟. 内隐职业性别刻板印象、信息完整性对大学生职业决策过程的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 282-288.

LENG Jing, LIU Weizhen, HOU Dongmin, SI Jiwei. The Effect of Implicit Career-gender Stereotype and Information Integrity on Process of Career Decision Making in College Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(3): 282-288.

参考文献

Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2010). Evaluating advisors:A policy-capturing study under conditions of complete and missing information. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(3), 227-249.

Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences:Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325-370.

Dawis, R. V. (1996). The theory of work adjustment and person-environment-correspondence counseling. In D. Brown, & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development:Applying contemporary theories to practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, (pp. 75-120).

Dijk, E. V., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 341-352.

Ebenbach, D. H., & Moore, C. F. (2000). Incomplete information, inferences, and individual differences:The case of environmental judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 1-27.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643-669.

Fox, C. R., & Weber, M. (2002). Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 476-498.

Gati, I., & Asher, I. (2001). The PIC model for career decision making:Prescreening, in-depth exploration, and choice. In F. T. Leong & A. Barak (Eds.), Contemporary models in vocational psychology:A volume in honor of Samuel H. Osipow (pp. 7-54). Mahwah, NJ, US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Wu, G. (2006). The uncertainty effect:When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1283-1309.

Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise:A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545-579.

Greenwald, A. G., Mcghee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.

Jepsen, D. A., & Dilley, J. S. (1974). Vocational decision-making models:A review and comparative analysis. Review of Educational Research, 44(3), 331-349.

K rner, C., Gertzen, H., Bettinger, C., & Albert, D. (2007). Comparative judgments with missing information:A regression and process tracing analysis. Acta Psychologica, 125(1), 66-84.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.

Miller, L., & Hayward, R. (2006). New jobs, old occupational stereotypes:Gender and jobs in the new economy. Journal of Education and Work, 19(1), 67-93.

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534-552.

Rode, C., Cosmides, L., Hell, W., & Tooby, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72(3), 269-304.

Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1315-1328.

蔡华俭, 周颖, 史青海. (2001). 内隐联想测验(IAT)及其在性别刻板印象研究中的应用. 社会心理研究, 32(4), 6-11.

胡志海, 梁宁建, 徐维东. (2004). 职业刻板印象及其影响因素研究. 心理科学, 27(3), 628-631.

连淑芳. (2003). 内隐社会认知:刻板印象的理论和实验研究(博士学位论文). 上海, 华东师范大学.

连淑芳. (2014). 女大学生就业弱势改善研究——内隐性别刻板印象的视角. 思想理论教育, 12(1), 87-91.

刘美桃. (2006). 内隐职业性别刻板印象的实验研究(硕士学位论文). 长沙, 湖南师范大学.

刘永芳, 陈霞. (2008). 时间限制和成就动机对职业决策线索加工的影响. 应用心理学, 14(4), 311-317.

任杰, 金志成, 杜嘉慧. (2009). 信息模糊性与时间充裕性在社会两难决策中的作用. 心理研究, 2(6), 32-36.

孙文静. (2012). 职业决策自我效能在职业探索和生涯决策中的作用(硕士学位论文). 宁波, 宁波大学.

王沛, 陈学锋. (2003). 刻板印象的意识性抑制. 心理学报, 35(3), 358-361.

王晓华. (2010). 大学生职业性别刻板印象与职业兴趣的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 济南, 山东师范大学.

王勇慧. (1999). 女大学生职业角色刻板印象研究. 青年研究, 25(9), 28-34.

杨骏. (2013). 风险偏好、信息完整性对职业决策信息加工的影响. 心理科学, 36(6), 1435-1440.

于泳红. (2003). 大学生内隐职业偏见和内隐职业性别刻板印象研究. 心理科学, 26(4), 672-675.

郑琼梅. (2004). "职业刻板印象" 与理工科女大学生就业难原因探析. 武汉科技大学学报:社会科学版, 6(1), 61-64.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[6]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[8]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[9]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[10]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[11]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[14]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[15]	蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed