大学生面孔信任评价的自动化加工

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以40名大学生为研究对象,通过内隐加工和内隐记忆的方法探讨面孔信任评价是否为自动加工。结果表明,在外显记忆任务下,大学生在三种可信度面孔的再认成绩两两之间差异显著,其中不可信任面孔再认正确率最高,反应最快;在内隐记忆任务下,不可信任面孔的再认成绩最好,且反应最快。这些结果说明,个体可以依据陌生面孔的可信度对面孔进行自动加工,且对不可信任面孔最为敏感。

关键词: 信任评价, 自动化, 面孔可信度, 大学生

Abstract: Using the methods of implicit processing and implicit memory,the present study investigated whether trustworthiness judgment of faces is automatic.Results in the explicit memory task showed significant effect of trustworthiness on the recall performances with the best and most rapid reaction for the untrustworthy faces.Whereas the implicit memory task showed the comparable results in which the participants also had the best and the most rapid memory for the untrustworthy faces.These findings taking together suggested that the trustworthiness judgment of unfamiliar faces is an automatic process,in which individuals are most sensitive to untrustworthy faces.

Key words: trust judgment, automatic process, face trustworthiness, undergraduate students

中图分类号:

B842

徐芬, 邹容, 马凤玲, 吴定诚. 大学生面孔信任评价的自动化加工[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 449-455.

XU Fen, ZOU Rong, MA Feng-ling, WU Ding-cheng. Automatic Processing of Undergraduate Students’ Trust Judgment based on Face[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(5): 449-455.

参考文献

[1] Ballew,C.C.2nd,& Todorov,A.(2007).Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,104 (46),17948-17953.
[2] Brownlow,S.(1992).Seeing is believing: facial appearance,credibility,and attitude change.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,16 (2),101-115.
[3] Chang,L.J.,Doll,B.B.,Wout,M.V.,Frank,M.J.,& Sanfey,A.G.(2010).Seeing is believing: trustworthiness as a dynamic belief.Cognitive Psychology,61(2),87-105.
[4] Colquitt,J.A.,Scott,B.A.,& LePine,J.A.(2007).Trust,trustworthiness,and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,92(4),909-927.
[5] Coren,S.,& Russell,J.A.(1992).The relative dominance of different facial expressions of emotion under conditions ofperceptual ambiguity.Cognition & Emotion,6,339-356.
[6] Engell,A.D.,Haxby,J.V.,& Todorov,A.(2007).Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdale.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,19 (9),1508-1519.
[7] Goldsteen,R.,Schorr,J.K.,& Goldsteen,K.S.(1989).Longitudinal study of appraisal at Three Mile Island: implications for life event research.Social Science and Medicine,28(4),389-398.
[8] Hasher,L.,& Zacks,R.T.(1984).Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence.American Psychologist,39(12),1372-1388.
[9] Kanwisher,N.,McDermott,J.,& Chun,M.M.(1997).The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.Journal of Neuroscience,17(11),4302-4311.
[10] Li,P.P.(2007).Towards an interdisciplinary conceptualization of trust: a typological approach.Management and Organization Review,3 (3),421-445.
[11] Li,P.P.(2008).Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust.Management and Organization Review,4(3),413-439.
[12] Mayer,R.C.,Davis,J.H.,& Schoorman,F.D.(1995).an integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review,20(3),709-734.
[13] McCarthy,G.,Puce,A.,Gore,J.C.,& Allison,T.(1997).Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9(5),605-610.
[14] Oosterhof,N.N.,& Todorov,A.(2008).The functional basis of face evaluation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,105(32),11087-11092.
[15] Rousseau,D.M.,Sitkin,S.B.,Burt,R.S.,& Camerer C.(1998).Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review,23(3),393-404.
[16] Todorov,A.,Baron,S.G.,& Oosterhof,N.N.(2008).Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach.SCAN,3,119-127.
[17] Todorov,A.,Mandisodza,A.N.,Goren,A.,& Hall,C.C.(2005).Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes.Science,308(5728),1623-1626.
[18] Todorov,A.,Pakrashi,M.,& Oosterhof,N.N.(2009).Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure.Social Cognition,27(6),813-833 Stirrat,M.,& Perrett,D.I.(2010).Valid facial cues to cooperation and Trust.Psychological Science,21(3),349-354.
[19] Walker,M.,& Vetter,T.(2009).Portraits made to measure:manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model.Journal of Vision,9(11),1-13.
[20] Willis,J.,& Todorov,A.(2006).First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.Psychological Science,17(7),592-598.
[21] Winston,J.S.,Strange,B.A.,O'Doherty,J.,& Dolan,R.J.(2005).Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces.Nature Neuroscience,5(3),277-283.
[22] Wout,M.V.,& Sanfey,A.G.(2008).Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.Cognition,108(3),796-803.
[23] Yamagishi,T.,Tanida,S.,Mashima,R.,Shimoma,E.,& Kanazawa,S.(2003).You can judge a book by its cover: evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators.Evolution and Human Behavior,24,290-301.
[24] Zacks,R.T.,Hasher,L.,& Sanft,H.(1982).Automatic encoding of event frequency: further findings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory,and Cognition,8(2),106-116
[25] Zucker,L.G.(1986).Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920.Research in Organizational Behavior,8(1),53-111.
[26] 徐岩,张亚旭,周晓林.(2003).面孔加工的认知神经科学研究: 回顾与展望.心理科学,2003,11(1),35-43.
[27] 吴定诚.(2010).面孔信任评价的种族效应.博士学位论文.北京师范大学.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[5]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[6]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[8]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[9]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[10]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[11]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.
[14]	李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑：反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[15]	蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed