人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分别选取217名和245名青少年参与研究,考察学业动机比较的方向与相似性对青少年主动情境同伴选择与被动情境同伴去选择的影响。结果发现:(1)与下行比较相比,学业动机上行比较时同伴选择较多且同伴去选择较少;(2)与低相似水平相比,学业动机高相似时同伴选择较多且同伴去选择较少;(3)学业动机比较的方向与相似性对同伴选择及去选择存在交互作用,高相似条件下个体倾向与上行比较者做同伴,而低相似性条件个体面对上行比较者较多发起同伴去选择;(4)学业动机比较可通过状态自尊对同伴去选择产生影响。研究结果有助于理解青少年同伴关系的构建,对于引导同伴交往、提升自尊水平有重要意义。

关键词: 青少年, 学业动机比较, 同伴选择, 同伴去选择, 状态自尊

Abstract: This study explored the influence of academic motivation comparison and peer similarity on active peer selection (study 1) and passive peer de-selection (study 2). A total of 217 and 245 adolescents participated in the two studies, respectively. The results showed that: (1) When being asked to select peers they wished to meet and interact with, adolescents preferred peers who had higher academic motivation. Besides, they were more likely to de-select those who had lower academic motivation; (2) Adolescents preferred to select those peers who had a similar level of academic motivation to themselves. Furthermore, they tended to de-select individuals with the dissimilar academic motivation to themselves; (3) There was an interaction between the direction and the similarity of academic motivation comparison on peer selection and de-selection. If the level of academic motivation similarity was high, adolescents tended to select those who had higher academic motivation and de-select those who had lower academic motivation. If the level of academic motivation similarity was low, adolescents still tended to select those who had higher academic motivation while de-select those who had higher academic motivation; (4) Academic motivation comparison could influence peer de-selection through state self-esteem. These findings enhance our understanding of the formation of adolescents' peer relationships and can be useful in the guidance of peer interaction and the promotion of self-esteem.

Key words: adolescent, academic motivation comparison, peer selection, peer de-selection, state self-esteem

中图分类号:

G442

沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.

SHA Jingying, ZHANG Xiangkui, LIU Qiandong. Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? The Influence of Academic Motivation Comparison on Adolescents' Peer Selection[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.

参考文献

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2010). Rusbult's investment model and the expansion of the self-expansion model. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 152-154.
Berndt, T. J., Laychak, A. E., & Park, K. (1990). Friends' influence on adolescents' academic achievement motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 664-670.
Boissicat, N., Pansu, P., & Bouffard, T. (2020). Does classroom social comparison bias students' evaluation of their own competence? Social Psychology of Education, 23, 1303-1326.
Brouwer, J., & Engels, M.C.(2022). The role of prosocial attitudes and academic achievement in peer networks in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(2), 567-584.
Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1167-1170.
Cassidy, J., Aikins, J. W., & Chernoff, J. J. (2003). Children's peer selection: Experimental examination of the role of self-perceptions.Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 495-508.
Chen, X. Y., Chang, L., He, Y. F., & Liu, H. Y. (2005). The peer group as a context:Moderating effects on relations between maternal parenting and social and school adjustment in Chinese children. Child Development, 76(2), 417-434.
Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51-69.
Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (1998).Handbook of child psychology (Sixth edition). New York: Wiley.
Dunn, J., Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). It hurts both ways:How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 2-14.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Gremmen, M. C., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement.Developmental Psychology, 53(7), 1356-1370.
Hartl, A. C., Laursen, B., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). A survival analysis of adolescent friendships: The downside of dissimilarity.Psychological Science, 26(8), 1304-1315.
Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Régner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J.,…Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156-170.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships.American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school.Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970-977.
Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Nurmi, J. E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Is depression contagious? A test of alternative peer socialization mechanisms of depressive symptoms in adolescent peer networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(3), 250-255.
Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and the state self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1290-1299.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(1), 91-103.
Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory.Psychological Review, 120(3), 544-560.
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011). Peer influences on academic motivation: Exploring multiple methods of assessing youths' most.Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 13-40.
Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 832-844.
Nezlek, J. B., & Plesko, R. M. (2003). Affect- and self-based models of relationships between daily events and daily well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 584-596.
Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., & Rambaran, A. J. (2013). Social goals and adolescent friendships: Social selection, deselection, and influence.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 550-562.
Prinstein, M. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008).Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1453-1464.
Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977).Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Halsted Press.
Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). It takes three: Selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent friendship networks. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 927-938.
Wolff, F., Helm, F., & Möller, J. (2019). Integrating the 2I/E model into dimensional comparison theory: Towards a comprehensive comparison theory of academic self-concept formation.Learning and Instruction, 62, 64-75.
陈万芬, 刘俊升, 李丹, 陈欣银. (2018). 新时代青少年早期文化价值观的发展轨迹:同伴接纳的作用. 心理科学, 41(6), 1302-1309.
付宗国, 张承芬. (2004). 群际情境下向上社会比较信息对自我评价的影响. 心理科学, 27(1), 84-87.
黄杰, 曹旻, 朱丹, 游旭群. (2018). 学业焦虑在亲密同伴之间相互影响的纵向研究. 心理科学, 41(6), 1382-1388.
纪林芹, 潘斌, 王春燕, 娄萍, 陈亮, 张文新. (2018). 青少年早期同伴拒绝、同伴侵害与抑郁的关系:交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 41(3), 579-585.
江汶, 佐斌. (2013). 大鱼小池效应研究评价及展望. 心理科学, 36(1), 157-163.
李振兴, 邓欢, 郭成. (2017). 学业自我概念的建构:内/外参照模型研究述评. 心理科学, 40(3), 606-611.
沙晶莹, 张向葵, 邓小平. (2017). 青少年与其同伴团体学业成就同质性的元分析. 应用心理学, 23(4), 345-354.
温忠麟, 刘红云, 侯杰泰. (2012). 调节效应和中介效应分析. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
邢淑芬, 俞国良. (2006). 社会比较:对比效应还是同化效应? 心理科学进展, 14(6), 944-949.
徐芬, 周晓禹, 马凤玲. (2016). 初中生的社会比较对认知与情感信任的影响. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 257-264.
张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. (2020). 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗?——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 36(1), 54-66.
朱晓斌, 张莉渺, 吴亮亮. (2011). 初中生成就目标定向、学业社会比较和学业自我效能的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(2), 255-258.
周宗奎, 孙晓军, 赵冬梅, 田媛, 范翠英. (2015). 同伴关系的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 62-70.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[10]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[11]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[12]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[13]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[14]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[15]	李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed