心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 718-725.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.13

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用

张雯, 王振宏   

  1. 陕西师范大学心理学院, 陕西省儿童青少年心理与行为健康哲学社会科学重点研究基地, 西安 710062
  • 发布日期:2023-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 王振宏 E-mail:wangzhenhong@snnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31671152)。

The Relationship between Negative Life Events and the Internalizing Problems among Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Social Support and the Moderating Role of Parent-adolescent Cohesion

ZHANG Wen, WANG Zhenhong   

  1. Shaanxi Provincial Key Research Center of Child Mental and Behavioral Health, School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062
  • Published:2023-09-11
  • Supported by:
    The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1905301);National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078115,21776108,21690083,22008078).

摘要: 考察负性生活事件与青少年内化问题间的关系以及社会支持和亲子亲和在其中的作用机制,采用青少年行为自评量表、青少年生活事件量表、社会支持问卷、亲子亲和问卷调查了1005名青少年。结果发现:(1)负性生活事件正向预测青少年的内化问题;(2)社会支持在负性生活事件与青少年内化问题关系中起中介作用;(3)亲子亲和在负性生活事件与青少年内化问题之间起到调节作用。研究结果表明负性生活事件不仅直接影响青少年的内化问题,还会通过社会支持间接影响青少年的内化问题;亲子亲和能够调节负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系,即负性生活事件对高亲子亲和和低亲子亲和青少年的影响作用都显著,但相比于亲子亲和水平低的青少年而言,负性生活事件对高亲子亲和青少年内化问题的影响更大。

关键词: 负性生活事件, 内化问题, 社会支持, 亲子亲和, 青少年

Abstract: The present study examined the relation between negative life events and adolescents' internalizing problems, as well as the mediating role of social support and moderating role of parent-child cohesion. 1005 adolescents joined our survey by fulfilling the Youth Self-Report, Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Check- list, Social Support Questionnaire, Parent-Adolescent Cohesion Questionnaire. The result showed that: (1) Negative life events predicted adolescents' internalizing problems positively; (2) Social support played mediating role in the relationship between negative life events and adolescents' internalizing problems; (3) Parent-adolescent cohesion moderated the relationship between negative life events and adolescents' internalizing problems. The present study exhibited that negative life events could not only affect adolescents' internalizing problems directly, but also affect adolescents' internalizing problems through the mediating effect of social support indirectly. parent-adolescent cohesion could moderate the impact of negative life events on internalizing problems, and negative life events had a greater impact on internalizing problems with high level of parent-adolescent cohension.

Key words: negative life events, internalizing problems, social support, parent-adolescent cohesion, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Achenbach T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Rescorla, L. A., Turner, L. V., & Althoff, R. R. (2016). Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(8), 647-656.
Albrecht, A. K., Galambos, N. L., & Jansson, S. M. (2007). Adolescents’ internalizing and aggressive behaviors and perceptions of parents’ psychological control: A panel study examining direction of effects.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(5), 673-684.
Appley, M. H., & Trumbull, R. A. (Eds.). (2012).Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological and social perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media.
Averdijk, M., Malti, T., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2012). Parental separation and child aggressive and internalizing behavior: An event history calendar analysis.Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43(2), 184-200.
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Meeus, W., & van Aken, M. A. (2004). The reciprocal relationship between early adolescent attachment and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviour.Journal of Adolescence, 27(3), 251-266.
Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (2020). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In Taylor, S. E., Singer, J. E., & Baum, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Health (Volume IV,pp. 253-267). New York: Routledge.
Cosgrove, V. E., Rhee, S. H., Gelhorn, H. L., Boeldt, D., Corley, R. C., Ehringer, M. A., … Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Structure and etiology of co-occurring internalizing and externalizing disorders in adolescents.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(1), 109-123.
Dangler, K. L. (2012).The emergence of internalizing disorders in children exposed to interparental conflict through the parent-child relationship (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Azusa Pacific University.
Deković, M. (1999). Risk and protective factors in the development of problem behavior during adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(6), 667-685.
Essau, C. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Olaya, B., & Seeley, J. R. (2014). Anxiety disorders in adolescents and psychosocial outcomes at age 30.Journal of Affective Disorders, 163, 125-132.
Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk.Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399-419.
Fox, J. K., Halpern, L. F., Ryan, J. L., & Lowe, K. A. (2010). Stressful life events and the tripartite model: Relations to anxiety and depression in adolescent females.Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), 43-54.
Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology.Child Development, 55(1), 97-111.
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & van Etten, M. (2005). Specificity of relations between adolescents’ cognitive emotion regulation strategies and internalizing and externalizing psychopathology.Journal of Adolescence, 28(5), 619-631.
Goodman, E., McEwen, B. S., Dolan, L. M., Schafer-Kalkhoff, T., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Social disadvantage and adolescent stress.Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(6), 484-492.
Gutman, L. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes.Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 522-537.
Han, Y., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Bares, C., Ma, J., Castillo, M., & Delva, J. (2012). Relationship between discordance in parental monitoring and behavioral problems among Chilean adolescents.Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 783-789.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention.Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105.
Hunt, D. E. (1975). Person-environment interaction: A challenge found wanting before it was tried.Review of Educational Research, 45(2), 209-230.
Lambert, S. F., Boyd, R. C., Cammack, N. L., & Ialongo, N. S. (2012). Relationship proximity to victims of witnessed community violence: associations with adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 1-9.
Landerman, R., George, L. K., Campbell, R. T., & Blazer, D. G. (1989). Alternative models of the stress buffering hypothesis.American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(5), 625-642.
Lin, N., & Ensel, W. M. (1984). Depression-mobility and its social etiology: The role of life events and social support.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25(2), 176-188.
McWey, L. M., Claridge, A. M., Wojciak, A. S., & Lettenberger‐Klein, C. G. (2015). Parent-adolescent relationship quality as an intervening variable on adolescent outcomes among families at risk: Dyadic analyses.Family Relations, 64(2), 249-262.
Moylan, C. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Sousa, C., Tajima, E. A., Herrenkohl, R. C., & Russo, M. J. (2010). The effects of child abuse and exposure to domestic violence on adolescent internalizing and externalizing behavior problems.Journal of Family Violence, 25(1), 53-63.
Oliva, A., Parra, Á., & Reina, M. C. (2014). Personal and contextual factors related to internalizing problems during adolescence.Child & Youth Care Forum, 43 (4), 505-520.
Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptabiling dimensions, family types and applications. Family Process, 18, 3-28.
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence.Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1017-1067.
Sanchez, Y. M., Lambert, S. F., & Cooley-Strickland, M. (2013). Adverse life events, coping and internalizing and externalizing behaviors in urban African American youth.Journal of Child & Family Studies, 22(1), 38-47.
Steeger, C. M., Cook, E. C., & Connell, C. M. (2017). The interactive effects of stressful family life events and cortisol reactivity on adolescent externalizing and internalizing behaviors.Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 225-234.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics(International edition of sixth edition). London: Pearson Education.
Tambelli, R., Laghi, F., Odorisio, F., & Notari, V. (2012). Attachment relationships and internalizing and externalizing problems among Italian adolescents.Children & Youth Services Review, 34(8), 1465-1471.
Tullius, J. M., De Kroon, M. L., Almansa, J., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2022). Adolescents’ mental health problems increase after parental divorce, not before, and persist until adulthood: A longitudinal TRAILS study.European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31,969-978.
Vanderbilt-Adriance, E., & Shaw, D. S. (2008). Conceptualizing and re-evaluating resilience across levels of risk, time, and domains of competence.Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 11(1-2), 30.
Wagner, B. M., Cohen, P., & Brook, J. S. (1996). Parent/adolescent relationships: Moderators of the effects of stressful life events.Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(3), 347-374.
Wingate, L. R., & Joiner Jr, T. E. (2004). Depression-related stress generation: A longitudinal study of black adolescents.Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 247-261.
Wolgast, A., & Donat, M. (2019). Cultural mindset and bullying experiences: An eight-year trend study of adolescents’ risk behaviors, internalizing problems, talking to friends, and social support.Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 257-269.
陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云. (2021).共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 439-446.
范方, 耿富磊, 张岚, 朱清. (2011). 负性生活事件,社会支持和创伤后应激障碍症状:对汶川地震后青少年的追踪研究. 心理学报, 43(12), 1398-1407.
范方, 柳武妹, 郑裕鸿, 崔苗苗. (2010). 震后6个月都江堰地区青少年心理问题及影响因素. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(1), 56-59.
方杰, 张敏强, 顾红磊, 梁东梅. (2014). 基于不对称区间估计的有调节的中介模型检验. 心理科学进展, 22(10), 1660-1668.
韩黎, 袁纪玮, 龙艳. (2021). 苔花盛开如牡丹?农村留守儿童负性生活事件与心理健康的关系. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 266-274.
贺莹莹. (2008). 高中生生活事件、应对方式与心理健康的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 四川师范大学, 成都.
刘婉, 万宇辉, 陶芳标, 郝加虎. (2017). 社会支持在童年期虐待与青少年非自杀性自伤行为关联中的中介作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 31(3), 230-234.
刘贤臣, 刘连启, 杨杰, 柴福勋, 王爱祯, 孙良民, 赵贵芳,马登岱. (1997). 青少年生活事件量表的信度效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志(1), 34-36.
罗一君, 孔繁昌, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. (2017). 压力事件对初中生抑郁的影响:网络使用动机与网络使用强度的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 337-344.
邱依雯, 娄熠雪, 雷怡. (2021). 青少年抑郁:基于社会支持的视角. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 288-297.
唐光政, 郭兰婷, 黄雪竹. (2005). Achenbach青少年自评量表问题部分成都市区常模. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(3), 183-186.
王美萍, 张文新. (2014). COMT基因rs6267多态性与青少年期亲子亲合与冲突的关系:性别与父母教养行为的调节作用分析. 心理学报, 46(7), 931-941.
王美萍. (2001). 父母教养方式,青少年的父母权威观/行为自主期望与亲子关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
王振宏, 彭源, 赵一萌. (2020). 父母婚姻质量与儿童内化问题:父母情绪表达的中介作用与儿童迷走神经活动的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(1), 121-128.
肖水源. (1994). 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用. 临床精神医学杂志, 4(2), 98-100.
徐夫真, 张玲玲, 魏星, 张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 陈欣银. (2015). 青少年早期内化问题的稳定性及其与母亲教养的关系. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 204-211.
徐文明, 叶彩霞, 方烨仪. (2020). 早期累积家庭风险对青少年内化问题的影响:弹性双重机制. 心理与行为研究, 18(3), 361-368.
许阳, 张卫, 喻承甫, 苏萍, 刘莎, 甄霜菊. (2017). 父母体罚与青少年焦虑抑郁的关系:同伴侵害的中介效应与亲子关系的调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 457-467.
杨丽恒, 马雪玲, 张华. (2015). 童年期受忽视对初中学生自伤行为的影响——社会支持的中介效应. 教育理论与实践, 35(2), 17-19.
杨逸群, 陈亮, 陈光辉, 张文新. (2020). 同伴拒绝,友谊支持对青少年抑郁的影响:有中介的调节模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(2), 348-353.
叶悦妹, 戴晓阳. (2008).大学生社会支持评定量表的编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(5), 456-458.
俞国良, 李森. (2021).危机与转机:童年期虐待对青少年心理健康的影响及应对策略. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 283(1), 5-15.
张文新, 王美萍, Fuligni, A. (2006). 青少年的自主期望、对父母权威的态度与亲子冲突和亲合. 心理学报, 38(6), 868-876.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[7] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[9] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[10] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11] 辛素飞, 王金睿, 彭海云, 徐柳青, 张一林, 盛靓. 负性生活事件对青少年焦虑的影响:基于认知行为疗法的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 710-717.
[12] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[13] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[14] 何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[15] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!