人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分别选取217名和245名青少年参与研究,考察学业动机比较的方向与相似性对青少年主动情境同伴选择与被动情境同伴去选择的影响。结果发现:(1)与下行比较相比,学业动机上行比较时同伴选择较多且同伴去选择较少;(2)与低相似水平相比,学业动机高相似时同伴选择较多且同伴去选择较少;(3)学业动机比较的方向与相似性对同伴选择及去选择存在交互作用,高相似条件下个体倾向与上行比较者做同伴,而低相似性条件个体面对上行比较者较多发起同伴去选择;(4)学业动机比较可通过状态自尊对同伴去选择产生影响。研究结果有助于理解青少年同伴关系的构建,对于引导同伴交往、提升自尊水平有重要意义。

关键词: 青少年, 学业动机比较, 同伴选择, 同伴去选择, 状态自尊

Abstract: This study explored the influence of academic motivation comparison and peer similarity on active peer selection (study 1) and passive peer de-selection (study 2). A total of 217 and 245 adolescents participated in the two studies, respectively. The results showed that: (1) When being asked to select peers they wished to meet and interact with, adolescents preferred peers who had higher academic motivation. Besides, they were more likely to de-select those who had lower academic motivation; (2) Adolescents preferred to select those peers who had a similar level of academic motivation to themselves. Furthermore, they tended to de-select individuals with the dissimilar academic motivation to themselves; (3) There was an interaction between the direction and the similarity of academic motivation comparison on peer selection and de-selection. If the level of academic motivation similarity was high, adolescents tended to select those who had higher academic motivation and de-select those who had lower academic motivation. If the level of academic motivation similarity was low, adolescents still tended to select those who had higher academic motivation while de-select those who had higher academic motivation; (4) Academic motivation comparison could influence peer de-selection through state self-esteem. These findings enhance our understanding of the formation of adolescents' peer relationships and can be useful in the guidance of peer interaction and the promotion of self-esteem.

Key words: adolescent, academic motivation comparison, peer selection, peer de-selection, state self-esteem

中图分类号:

G442

沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.

SHA Jingying, ZHANG Xiangkui, LIU Qiandong. Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? The Influence of Academic Motivation Comparison on Adolescents' Peer Selection[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.

参考文献

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2010). Rusbult's investment model and the expansion of the self-expansion model. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 152-154.
Berndt, T. J., Laychak, A. E., & Park, K. (1990). Friends' influence on adolescents' academic achievement motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 664-670.
Boissicat, N., Pansu, P., & Bouffard, T. (2020). Does classroom social comparison bias students' evaluation of their own competence? Social Psychology of Education, 23, 1303-1326.
Brouwer, J., & Engels, M.C.(2022). The role of prosocial attitudes and academic achievement in peer networks in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(2), 567-584.
Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1167-1170.
Cassidy, J., Aikins, J. W., & Chernoff, J. J. (2003). Children's peer selection: Experimental examination of the role of self-perceptions.Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 495-508.
Chen, X. Y., Chang, L., He, Y. F., & Liu, H. Y. (2005). The peer group as a context:Moderating effects on relations between maternal parenting and social and school adjustment in Chinese children. Child Development, 76(2), 417-434.
Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51-69.
Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (1998).Handbook of child psychology (Sixth edition). New York: Wiley.
Dunn, J., Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). It hurts both ways:How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 2-14.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Gremmen, M. C., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement.Developmental Psychology, 53(7), 1356-1370.
Hartl, A. C., Laursen, B., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). A survival analysis of adolescent friendships: The downside of dissimilarity.Psychological Science, 26(8), 1304-1315.
Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Régner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J.,…Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156-170.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships.American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school.Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970-977.
Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Nurmi, J. E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Is depression contagious? A test of alternative peer socialization mechanisms of depressive symptoms in adolescent peer networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(3), 250-255.
Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and the state self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1290-1299.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(1), 91-103.
Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory.Psychological Review, 120(3), 544-560.
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011). Peer influences on academic motivation: Exploring multiple methods of assessing youths' most.Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 13-40.
Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 832-844.
Nezlek, J. B., & Plesko, R. M. (2003). Affect- and self-based models of relationships between daily events and daily well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 584-596.
Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., & Rambaran, A. J. (2013). Social goals and adolescent friendships: Social selection, deselection, and influence.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 550-562.
Prinstein, M. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008).Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1453-1464.
Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977).Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Halsted Press.
Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). It takes three: Selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent friendship networks. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 927-938.
Wolff, F., Helm, F., & Möller, J. (2019). Integrating the 2I/E model into dimensional comparison theory: Towards a comprehensive comparison theory of academic self-concept formation.Learning and Instruction, 62, 64-75.
陈万芬, 刘俊升, 李丹, 陈欣银. (2018). 新时代青少年早期文化价值观的发展轨迹:同伴接纳的作用. 心理科学, 41(6), 1302-1309.
付宗国, 张承芬. (2004). 群际情境下向上社会比较信息对自我评价的影响. 心理科学, 27(1), 84-87.
黄杰, 曹旻, 朱丹, 游旭群. (2018). 学业焦虑在亲密同伴之间相互影响的纵向研究. 心理科学, 41(6), 1382-1388.
纪林芹, 潘斌, 王春燕, 娄萍, 陈亮, 张文新. (2018). 青少年早期同伴拒绝、同伴侵害与抑郁的关系:交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 41(3), 579-585.
江汶, 佐斌. (2013). 大鱼小池效应研究评价及展望. 心理科学, 36(1), 157-163.
李振兴, 邓欢, 郭成. (2017). 学业自我概念的建构:内/外参照模型研究述评. 心理科学, 40(3), 606-611.
沙晶莹, 张向葵, 邓小平. (2017). 青少年与其同伴团体学业成就同质性的元分析. 应用心理学, 23(4), 345-354.
温忠麟, 刘红云, 侯杰泰. (2012). 调节效应和中介效应分析. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
邢淑芬, 俞国良. (2006). 社会比较:对比效应还是同化效应? 心理科学进展, 14(6), 944-949.
徐芬, 周晓禹, 马凤玲. (2016). 初中生的社会比较对认知与情感信任的影响. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 257-264.
张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. (2020). 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗?——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 36(1), 54-66.
朱晓斌, 张莉渺, 吴亮亮. (2011). 初中生成就目标定向、学业社会比较和学业自我效能的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(2), 255-258.
周宗奎, 孙晓军, 赵冬梅, 田媛, 范翠英. (2015). 同伴关系的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 62-70.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2]	谭瑞峰, 陈穗清, 郭新颖, 李梦娜. 特质视角下学前幼儿同伴选择的社会善念偏好[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 305-314.
[3]	李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[4]	赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[5]	刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[6]	王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[7]	李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[8]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[9]	边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[10]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[11]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[12]	王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[13]	陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[14]	汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[15]	张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed