中国大学生幸福评价的时间轨迹

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 幸福评价的时间轨迹是指人们对自己的过去、现在和将来的幸福评价的轨迹。从过去、现在和将来角度来研究幸福, 对于全面理解幸福本质具有重要的意义。本研究用两项研究探索了中国大学生的幸福评价的时间轨迹。研究1让130名大学生完成时间维度生活满意度量表, 结果发现, 中国大学生认为过去与现在的幸福没有显著区别, 将来比过去和现在都幸福, 即过去幸福=现在幸福 < 将来幸福, 这与西方的研究结果过去幸福 < 现在幸福 < 将来幸福的轨迹不同。研究2采用实验法, 让45名大学生对描述幸福和不幸福的形容词进行评定, 再次支持了中国大学生的这一幸福评价的时间轨迹。不幸福评价的时间轨迹呈现出过去不幸福=现在不幸福 > 将来不幸福的趋势。

关键词: 大学生, 幸福评价, 时间轨迹, 生活满意度

Abstract: Temporal trajectories for subjective well-being incorporate individuals' appraisals of their past, present, and anticipated future well-being. The exploration on the well-beings that are evaluated from the past, present and future perspective has important significance for a comprehensive understanding of the essence of well-being. To explore this subjective temporal trajectories among Chinese college students, two studies were designed. In study 1, we asked 130 participants to fill the Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale. The results showed that the ratings for their past and present well-being do not have significant difference, but are both lower than the rating of future well-being, i.e. past well-being= present well-being < future well-being. The trajectory of subjective well-being among Chinese college students is different from the western trajectory (past well-being < present well-being < future well-being). In study 2, an designed experiment asked 45 students to evaluate some adjectives about happniess and unhappniess, which revealed a same trajectory of subjective well-being with Study 1.

Key words: college students, well-being evaluation, temporal trajectory, life satisfaction

中图分类号:

B844

刘杰, 黄希庭. 中国大学生幸福评价的时间轨迹[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 257-263.

LIU Jie, HUANG Xiting. The Temporal Trajectory for Subective Well-being among Chinese College Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(3): 257-263.

参考文献

Busseri, M.A. (2013). How Dispositional Optimists and Pessimists Evaluate their Past, Present and Anticipated Future Life Satisfaction: A Lifespan Approach. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 185-199.
Busseri, M.A., Choma, B.L., & Sadava, S.W. (2009). Functional or Fantasy? Examining the Implications of Subjective Temporal Perspective "Trajectories" for Life Satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 295-308.
Busseri, M.A., Choma, B.L., & Sadava, S.W. (2012). Subjective temporal trajectories for subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 1-15.
Cai, H.J., Brown, J.D., Deng, C.P., & Oakes, M.A. (2007). Self-esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self-evaluations or affective self-regard? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(3), 162-170.
Choma, B.L., Busseri, M.A., & Sadava, S.W. (2014). Deciphering Subjective Trajectories for Life Satisfaction Using Self-versus-Normative Other Discrepancies, Self-esteem and Hope. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 107-119.
Davidson, K., & Prkachin, K. (1997). Optimism and unrealistic optimism have an interacting impact on health-promoting behavior and knowledge changes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 617-625.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being The science of well-being (pp. 11-58): Springer.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Helweg-Larsen, M., & Shepperd, J.A. (2001). Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 74-95.
Kim, Y.H., Cai, H.J., Gilliland, M., Chiu, C.Y., Xia, S., & Tam, K.P. (2012). Standing in the glory or shadow of the past self: cultures differ in how much the past self affects current subjective well-being. Emotion, 12(5), 1111-1117.
Kim, Y.H., Chiu, C.Y., Peng, S.Q., Cai, H.J., & Tov, W. (2010). Explaining East-West differences in the likelihood of making favorable self-evaluations: The role of evaluation apprehension and directness of expression. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 62-75.
Luo, Y.M., Huang, X.T., Chen, Y.G., Jackson, T., & Wei, D.T. (2010). Negativity bias of the self across time: an event-related potentials study. Neuroscience letters, 475(2), 69-73.
MacLeod, A.K., & Conway, C. (2005). Well-being and the anticipation of future positive experiences: The role of income, social networks, and planning ability. Cognition & emotion, 19(3), 357-374.
Oettingen, G., Pak, H-J., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal-setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(5), 736-753.
Okun, M.A., Dittburner, J.L., & Huff, B.P. (2006). Perceived changes in well-being: The role of chronological age, target age, and type of measure. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 63(4), 259-278.
Pavot, W. (2014). Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale (TSWLS). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 6609-6611.
Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 340-354.
Ross, M., Heine, S.J., Wilson, A.E., & Sugimori, S. (2005). Cross-cultural discrepancies in self-appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1175-1188.
Ross, M., & Newby-Clark, I.R. (1998). Construing the past and future. Social Cognition, 16(1), 133-150.
Sedikides, C., & Hepper, E.G. (2009). Self-improvement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 899-917.
Staudinger, U.M., Bluck, S., & Herzberg, P.Y. (2003). Looking back and looking ahead: adult age differences in consistency of diachronous ratings of subjective well-being. Psychology and Aging, 18(1), 13-24.
Takata, T. (2003). Self-Enhancement and Self-Criticism in Japanese Culture An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(5), 542-551.
Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological bulletin, 103(2), 193-210.
Yamaguchi, S., Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Murakami, F., Chen, D., Shiomura, K.,et al. (2007). Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 18(6), 498-500.
陈莹. (2008). 时间自我: 过去我, 现在我和将来我的一致与不一致. (博士), 重庆: 西南大学博士学位论文.
高良, 郑雪, 严标宾. (2010). 幸福感的中西差异:自我建构的视角. 心理科学进展, 18(7), 1041-1045.
胡金生, 黄希庭. (2006). 华人社会中的自谦初探. 心理科学, 29(6), 1392-1395.
胡金生, 黄希庭. (2009). 自谦: 中国人一种重要的行事风格初探. 心理学报(9), 842-852.
黄希庭, 李继波, 刘杰. (2012). 城市幸福指数之思考. 西南大学学报: 社会科学版, 38(5), 83-91.
罗扬眉. (2011). 时间自我态度的外显和内隐测量. (硕士), 重庆: 西南大学硕士学位论文.
赵志裕, 邹智敏, 林升栋. (2010). 文化与社会赞许反应: 社会个人互动的观点. 心理学报, 42(1), 48-55.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[6]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[7]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[8]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[9]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[10]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[11]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[12]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[13]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[14]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[15]	张宝生, 李鑫, 李新野, 张庆普. 主观规范对大学生志愿者志愿工作投入的影响机制研究——一个链式双重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 658-666.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed