呈现方式对小学生和大学生分类影响的眼动研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 63-67.

呈现方式对小学生和大学生分类影响的眼动研究

戴斌荣^1,3, 阴国恩², 俞国良³

1. 盐城师院教科院, 江苏, 224002;
2. 天津师大心理与行为研究中心, 天津, 300074;
3. 中国人民大学心理研究所, 北京, 100872

出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
作者简介:戴斌荣(1964- ),男,中国人民大学博士后,盐城师范学院教科院院长、副教授.E-mail:Binrongdai@163.com
基金资助:
第四十批中国博士后科学基金一等资助金(20060400124)项目;江苏省教育厅哲社基金项目O5SJDXLX001的资助

Eye Movement Researches into Effect of Stimuli Presenting Mode on Classification of Undergraduates and Pupils

DAI Bin-rong^1,3, YIN Guo-en², YU Guo-liang³

1. Education Department of Yancheng Teacher's College, Jiangsu 224000;
2. Center for Psychology and Behavier Studies of Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
3. Institute of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用ASL-504型眼动仪,采用2×2的被试间设计,对22名智力、视力均正常的小学生和24名大学生在两种呈现方式下的分类结果和主要眼动指标加以考察。结果表明:(1)小学生分类结果不存在显著的呈现方式差异,大学生分类结果存在显著的呈现方式差异。(2)被试分类结果是否存在显著的呈现方式差异与其兴趣区数目、注视次数、注视频率、注视点持续时间等眼动指标在相应条件下是否存在显著差异是一致的。

关键词: 小学生, 大学生, 分类, 呈现方式, 眼动

Abstract: The ASL 504 eye tracker was used in the experiment.The experiment is 2-inter-subjects design.Classif ication index and the main eye movement index are investigated by using 24 undergraduates and 22 pupils as subjects.The sights of the undergraduates were normal,the intelligence and sights of the pupils are both normal on one stimuli picture which was presented inconditions.The results are as follows: (1) The effect of stimuli presenting mode on classification of the undergraduates was significant while it was not significant on that of the pupils.(2) whether there are significant differences of stimuli-presenting mode between classification of the pupils and undergraduates is consistent with whether there are significant differences of eye movement index in the homologous condition between them,including the numbers of area of interest,times of fixation,frequency of fixation and duration of each fixation in the homologous condit ion.It doesn't go all the way with the duration of fixation.

Key words: pupils, undergraduates, classification, stimuli presenting mode, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842.5

戴斌荣, 阴国恩, 俞国良. 呈现方式对小学生和大学生分类影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 63-67.

DAI Bin-rong, YIN Guo-en, YU Guo-liang. Eye Movement Researches into Effect of Stimuli Presenting Mode on Classification of Undergraduates and Pupils[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(4): 63-67.

参考文献

[1] Thompson L A.Dimensional strategies dominate perceptual classtification.Child Development.1994,65(6):1627.
[2] Evans P,Smith B.The development of identity as a privileged relation in classification:when very similar is just not similar enough.Cognitive Development.1988,3(3):265.
[3] Smith L B.A model of perceptual classification in children and adults.Psychological Review.1989,96:125-144.
[4] Laura A T.Dimensional stralegies dominate perceptual classification.Child Development.1994,65:1627-1645.
[5] Kimchi R.Basic-level categorization and part-whole perception in children.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society.1993,31(1):23.
[6] Alan W K,& Medin D L.A two-stage model of Category construction.Cognitive Science,1992,16:81-121.
[7] Medin D L,Wattenmaker W D,& Hampson S E.Family resemblance,conceptual cohesiveness,and Category construction.Cognitive psychology,1987,19:242-279.
[8] 阴国恩,戴斌荣.材料呈现方式对初中生和大学生分类的影响.心理发展与教育,2002,18(4):6-10.
[9] Medin D L & Schwanenflugel P J.Linear separability in classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psycholo gy:Human learning and Memory,1981(7):355-368.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[5]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[6]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[7]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[8]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[9]	张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[10]	何晓燕, 花蕊, 段继鹏, 罗润锋, 尹军. 7~9岁儿童对群体内成员间互相帮助的道德责任探究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 173-183.
[11]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[12]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[13]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[14]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[15]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed