心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 781-787.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.06.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究

王敬欣1, 赵赛男1, 徐倩倩2   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
    2. 潍坊理工学院师范学院, 潍坊 262500
  • 发布日期:2023-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 徐倩倩, 王敬欣 E-mail:qianqianpsy@163.com;wjxpsy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81771823)。

Effects of Spacing and Word Frequency on the Reading of Young and Older Adults: An Eye Movement Study

WANG Jingxin1, ZHAO Sainan1, XU Qianqian2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Normal College, Weifang Institute of Technology, Weifang 262500
  • Published:2023-11-11

摘要: 本研究利用眼动仪记录青年人和老年人在阅读插入字间空格文本时的眼动轨迹,考察字间空格的增大或减小对青年人和老年人阅读不同词频句子的影响。结果发现,增大字间空格和正常条件下的阅读时间没有显著差异,并且字间空格对高低频词的影响没有显著差异。更重要的是,相较于青年人,老年人在缩小字间空格条件下的注视时间更长。以上研究结果表明,增大字间空格对读者的阅读无显著促进或抑制作用,但是老年人对视觉特征的变化更敏感,减小字间空格会显著干扰老年人的阅读行为。

关键词: 字间空格, 词频, 汉语阅读, 眼动研究

Abstract: An EyeLink 2000 eye-tracker recorded each participant's right-eye gaze location while they were reading inter-character spacing text. Participants were 24 young adults aged 18~26 years (M=21 years) and 24 older adults aged 65~76 years (M=66 years) from the Tianjin Normal University and community near the university. The results showed that there was no significant difference in reading time between increased inter-character spacing and normal condition, and there was no significant difference in the effect of inter-character spacing on high and low frequency words. What's more, significant interactions between age-group and spacing condition were found for average fixation durations, forward saccade length and number of forward saccade fixations. Under the condition of decreased and normal inter-character spacing, older adults had great differences in eye movements than young adults, and had longer fixation durations. Therefore, the results indicate that increase inter-character spacing had no significant influence on reading, and decrease inter-character spacing will had greater disrupt for older than young adults. It shows that older adults are more sensitive to visual changes, and visual rather than lexical processing is disrupted more for older adults.

Key words: inter-character spacing, word frequency, Chinese reading, eye movement study

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, X., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277-1287.
Inhoff, A. W., Liu, W., Wang, J., & Fu, D. J. (1997). Use of spatial information during the reading of Chinese text. In Peng, D. L., Shu, H., & Chen, H. C. (Eds.), Cognitive research on Chinese language (pp. 296-329). Jinan, China: Shan Dong Educational Publishing.
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 262-284.
Li X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895-913.
Li, S., Li, L., Wang, J., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers.Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 685-692.
Li, S., Oliver-Mighten, L., Li, L., White, S. J., Paterson, K. B., Wang, J., … McGowan, V. A. (2019). Adult age differences in effects of text spacing on eye movements during reading.Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2700.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02700
Ma, G. J. (2017). Does inter-word spacing influence lexical processing in Chinese reading?Visual Cognition, 25(7-8), 815-824.
Malt, B. C., & Seamon, J. G. (1978). Peripheral and cognitive components of eye guidance in filled-space reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(5), 399-402.
Mccarley, J. S., Yamani, Y., Kramer, A. F., & Mounts, J. R. W. (2012). Age, clutter, and competitive selection. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 616-626.
McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Jordan, T. R., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Aging and the use of inter-word spaces during reading: Evidence from eye movements.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 740-747.
Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 268-281.
Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013a). Aging and the control of binocular fixations during reading.Psychology & Aging, 28(3), 789-795.
Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013b). Filtered text reveals adult age differences in reading: Evidence from eyemovements. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 352-364.
Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013c). Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: Evidence from eye movements.PeerJ, 1(1), e63. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.63
Pelli, D. G., Robson, J. G., & Wilkins, A. J. (1988). The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity.Clinical Vision Sciences, 2(3), 187-199.
Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: the role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 8(6), 817-833.
Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. M. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers.Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 755-760.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129-1144.
Rayner, K., Reichle, E., Stroud, M., Williams, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448-465.
Rayner, K., Yang, J., Schuett, S., & Slattery, T. J. (2013). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text. Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 354-361.
Scialfa, C. T., Cordazzo, S., Bubric, K., & Lyon, J. (2013). Aging and visual crowding.The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science, 68(4), 522-528.
Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Chang, M., Paterson, K. B., … McGowan, V. A. (2018). Adult age differences in eye movements during reading: The evidence from Chinese.The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(4), 584-593.
Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Effects of aging and text stimulus quality on the word frequency effect during Chinese reading.Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 693-712.
Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(Pt 2), 259-268.
Yang, H.-M., & McConkie, G. W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.),Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 207-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (2011). Eye movements during Chinese reading. In I. Gilchrist & S. Everling (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 961-978). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(7), 1409-1425.
李琳. (2017). 中文阅读中的老化效应:来自眼动研究的证据 (博士学位论文),天津师范大学.
李馨, 白学军, 闫国利. (2011). 词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 9(2), 133-139.
刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. (2019). 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据. 心理发展与教育, 35(6), 665-677.
沈德立, 白学军, 臧传丽, 闫国利, 冯本才, 范晓红. (2010). 词切分对初学者句子阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 42(2), 159-172.
王敬欣,徐倩倩,郝立莎,张雪. (2019). 汉字间空格大小对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究. 心理科学, 43(1), 68-74.
[1] 白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. 汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 85-91.
[2] 王晓辰, 李其维, 李清. 小学汉语阅读障碍儿童的PASS认知加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 569-576.
[3] 闫国利, 熊建萍, 白学军. 小学五年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!