社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.05.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察社会排斥与恶意创造力的关系以及应对方式和攻击性在其中的作用,本研究采用社会排斥量表、简易应对方式问卷、中文版Buss-Perry攻击量表和恶意创造力行为量表对广东省三所高校的863名大学生进行调查。结果发现:(1)社会排斥正向预测恶意创造力;(2)消极应对方式和攻击性在社会排斥和恶意创造力间的链式中介作用显著;(3)积极应对方式和攻击性在社会排斥和恶意创造力间的链式中介作用不显著。研究结果进一步揭示了社会排斥对大学生恶意创造力影响的内在机制。

关键词: 社会排斥, 恶意创造力, 应对方式, 攻击性, 大学生

Abstract: To explore the relationship between social exclusion and malevolent creativity, and the role of coping styles and aggressiveness in it, we adopted the Social Exclusion Scale, Simple Coping Style Questionnaire, Buss-Perry Attack Scale(Chinese Version), and Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale to investigate 863 college students from three universities located in Guangdong province. The results show that:(1) Social exclusion positively predicts malevolent creativity; (2) Negative coping style and aggressiveness play a significant chain role in social exclusion and malevolent creativity; (3) Positive coping style and aggressiveness have no significant chain mediating effect between social exclusion and malevolent creativity. The results of this study reveal the mechanism of social exclusion on college student’s malevolent creativity.

Key words: social exclusion, malevolent creativity, coping styles, aggressiveness, college students

中图分类号:

B844

李娇娇, 徐碧波, 袁海龙, 尹锡杨. 社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.

LI Jiaojiao, XU Bibo, YUAN Hailong, YIN Xiyang. The Relationship between Social Exclusion and Malevolent Creativity of College Students: The Chain Mediating Effect of Coping Styles and Aggressiveness[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.

参考文献

Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Chen, Y., Deidre, C.K.,＆ DE Drear, C. K. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590-1602.
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Y., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590-1602.
Baek, H., Roberts, A. M., & Higgins, G. E. (2018). The impact of family indifference on delinquency among American Indian youth: A test of general strain theory.Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 16(1), 57-75.
Buck, B., Pink-ham, A. E., Harvey, P. D., & Penn, D. L. (2016). Revisiting the validity of measures of social cognitive bias in schizophrenia:Additional results from the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation(SCOPE) study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 441-454.
Buckley, K. E., Wankel, R. E., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection:Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 14-28.
Chester, D. S., & Dew all, C. N. (2017). Combating the sting of rejection with the pleasure of revenge: A new look at how emotion shapes aggression.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 112(3), 413-430.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime.Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105-115.
Dewall, C. N., Twinge, J. M., Gitter, S, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). It’s the thought that counts:The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96(1), 45-59.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1998). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, (3), 466-475.
Gabbiadini, A., & Rivas, P. (2017). The lone gamer: Social exclusion predicts violent video game preferences and fuels aggressive inclinations in adolescent players. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 113-124.
Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2017). Increasing wealth inequalitymay increase interpersonal hostility:The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(6), 766-776.
Gill, P., Horgan, J., Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. D. (2013). Malevolent creativity in terrorist organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(2), 125-151.
Gutworth M. B., Cushenbery, L., & Hunter, S. T. (2016). Creativity for deliberate harm: Malevolent creativity and social information processing theory.The Journal of Creativity Behavior, 52(4), 305-322.
Hames, J. L., Rogers, M. L., Silva, C., Ribeiro, J. D., Teale, N. E., & Joiner, T. E. (2018). A social exclusion manipulation interacts with acquired capability for suicide to predict self-aggressive behaviors. Archives of Suicide Research, 22(1), 32-45.
Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity:The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682
Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious:The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54-64.
Hayes, A. F. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. In D. A. Kenny & T. D. Little (Eds.), Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Jia, X., Wang, Q., & Lin, L. (2020). The relationship between childhood neglect and malevolent creativity: The mediating effect of the dark triad personality.Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 613695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695
Kim, S. H., Vincent, L. C., & Gonzalo, J. A. (2013). Outside advantage: Can social rejection fuel creative thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142, 605-611.
Lee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 73-82.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (2006). Dynamics of individual ←→ context relations in human development: A developmental systems perspective. In J. C. Thomas, D. L. Segal, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology, Vol. 1. Personality and Everyday Functioning (pp. 23-43). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Liu, W., Li, Z., Ling, Y., & Cai, T. (2016). Core self-evaluations and coping styles as mediators between social support and well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 35-39.
Liu, X., Liao, H., Derfler-Rozin, R., Zheng, X., Wee, E. X. M., & Qiu, F. (2020). In line and out of the box: How ethical leaders help offset the negative effect of morality on creativity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1447-1465.
Na, H., Dancy, B. L., & Park, C. (2015). College student engaging in cyberbullying Victimization: Cognitive appraisals, coping strategies, and psychological adjustments.Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 29(3),155-161.
Peake, S. J., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., Moore, W. E., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2013). Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: Neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making. Neuroimage, 82, 23-34.
Petrou, P., vander Linden, D., & Salcescu, O. C. (2020). When breaking the rules relates to creativity:The role of creative problem-solving demands and organizational constraints. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 54(1), 184-195.
Reinhard, M. A., Dewald-Kaufmann, J., Wüstenberg, T., Musil, R., Barton, B. B., Jobst, A., & Padberg, F. (2019). The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: A systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 270(3), 521-532.
Ren, D. N., Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2018). Hurt people hurt people: Ostracism and aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 34-38.
Riva, P., Romero Lauro, L. J., Dewall, C. N., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2015). Reducing aggressive responses to social exclusion using trans-cranial direct current stimulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(3), 352-356.
Rudert, S.C., Janke, S. & Greifeneder, R.(2020).The experience of ostracism over the adult life span. Developmental Psychology, 56(10), 1999-2012.
Williams, K. D.(2007). Ostracism: The kiss of social death. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 236-247.
Zhu, J. J., Yu, C. F., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., Jiang, Y. P., Chen, Y. Y., & Zhen, S. J. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity:predicting adolescent problem behaviors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 58, 39-50.
程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. (2021). 愤怒情绪对不同类型恶意创造力表现的影响. 心理科学, 44(6), 1336-1345.
邸妙词, 刘儒德, 高钦, 王佳, 魏军, 唐铭. (2015). 小学生调节聚焦对生活满意度的影响:压力应对方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, (3), 327-333.
杜建政, 夏冰丽. (2008). 心理学视野中的社会排斥. 心理科学进展, (6), 981-986.
方永慈. (2019). 中学生父母控制、应对方式与攻击行为的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27 (12), 1875-1879.
冯永辉. (2016). 青少年压力与吸烟行为的关系:应对方式的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(1), 77-80.
贡喆, 刘昌. (2016). 恶意创造力:概念、测量方法、影响因素以及研究展望. 心理科学, 39(1), 63-68.
侯佳璐, 康凤英, 焦玉, 杜小梅, 李月琴. (2022). 童年创伤与青少年抑郁的关系:社会支持和应对方式的中介作用. 护理研究, 36(16), 2909-2913.
解亚宁. (1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 53-54.
梁宝勇, 郭倩玉, 郭良才, 杜桂芝, 刘畅. (1999). 关于应付的一些思考与实证研究Ⅱ-应付方式的评定、分类与估价.中国临床心理学杂志, (4), 200-203.
刘俊升, 周颖, 顾文瑜. (2009). Buss-Perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 449-451.
刘世宏, 许晓璠, 章益磊, 刘啸莳, 李丹. (2019). 同伴压力知觉与青少年自杀意念:侵入性反刍和回避应对的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(2), 321-325+329.
雷玉菊, 杨秀娟, 周宗奎, 窦刚, 谢岭. (2020). 社会排斥与自尊:应对方式的中介作用和内隐人格观的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(3), 576-580.
彭苏浩, 陶丹, 冷玥, 邓慧华. (2019). 社会排斥的心理行为特征及其脑机制. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1656-1666.
乔熙诺. (2019). 恶意创造力的神经基础初探(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
邵蕾, 张登浩. (2021). 社会排斥后的行为反应:基于一般攻击模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29 (6), 1163-1171.
万宇辉, 陶芳标. (2020). 从童年期不良经历的视角认识青少年心理行为问题. 中国学校卫生, 41(4), 484-489.
王静雯. (2017). 青少年父母控制、气质性乐观、应对方式与攻击行为的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
王丹, 王典慧, 陈文锋. (2022). 青少年心理韧性与恶意创造性行为倾向的关系. 心理学报, 4 (2), 154-167.
王彬鈺, 贡喆. (2021). 攻击性与恶意创造力的关系:链式中介效应分析. 心理研究, 14(6), 558-564.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
吴惠君, 张姝玥, 曾宇倩. (2013). 大学生社会排斥问卷的编制与信效度检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(12), 1829-1831.
吴思佳. (2021). 社会排斥与恶意创造力:愤怒与攻击性的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
徐四华, 杨钒. (2016). 大学生的愤怒情绪在社会排斥与行为冲动性间的中介作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(3), 220-225.
熊猛, 马建平, 叶一舵. (2020). 相对剥夺感对离异家庭儿童抑郁的影响:一个有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(3), 523-527.
杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. (2016). 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 236-245.
杨蕊, 王琪林, 何佩, 向虹霓, 邓欣童, 杨梅. (2021). 中小学教师压力知觉和抑郁、焦虑的关系:应对方式的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 29(12), 1842-1848.
杨玲, 郭瑾瑾, 曹华, 杜琴琴. (2019). 应对方式在大学生童年创伤与攻击行为关系中的作用机制. 心理技术与应用, 7(10), 614-619+628.
余芝兰. (2008). 中学生应对方式研究综述. 吉林省教育学院学报, 24(1), 53-54.
张丽华, 施国春. (2016). 攻击性和自尊关系的研究现状及展望. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 39(5), 65-71.
张珊珊, 张野, 代辰旭. (2020). 心理忽视与虐待对青少年关系攻击的影响研究——基于Bootstrap方法的分析. 牡丹江大学学报, 29(9), 5-9+24.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (6), 942-950.
庄乾, 李莹, 刘一军, 陈安涛. (2015). 情绪智力、应对方式对大学生外显与内隐攻击性的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(12), 122-127.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[2]	苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫. 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标:个人中心分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 572-588.
[3]	胡志琴, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络欺凌的关系：道德推脱的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 346-356.
[4]	王蕾, 邴倩, 赵景欣. 亲子分离背景下的亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 403-411.
[5]	薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧. 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 421-430.
[6]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[7]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[8]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[9]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[10]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[11]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[12]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[13]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[14]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[15]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.