心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 403-411.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.03.11
王蕾1, 邴倩2, 赵景欣1
WANG Lei1, BING Qian2, ZHAO Jingxin1
摘要: 父母外出务工带来的亲子分离使许多个体长期遭受抑郁的困扰,但亲子分离对个体抑郁生物-环境作用机制的影响尚不清楚。采用问卷调查、半结构化访谈和实验法,以210名大学生为被试,考察了早期亲子分离经历对大学生抑郁的影响,检验了亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动(SCLR)对大学生抑郁的交互作用是否会因早期亲子分离经历的不同而有所差异。结果发现:(1)亲子分离经历正向预测大学生抑郁,亲子亲合负向预测大学生抑郁;(2) SCLR对父子亲合与大学生抑郁关系的调节作用会受到亲子分离经历的影响。这表明,早期亲子分离经历能够改变大学生抑郁的生物-环境作用机制。
中图分类号:
Abaied, J. L. (2016). Skin conductance level reactivity as a moderator of the link between parent depressive symptoms and psychosocial adjustment in emerging adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(4), 534-556. Abaied, J. L., Stanger, S. B., Wagner, C., Sanders, W., Dyer, W. J., & Padilla-Walker, L. (2018). Parasympathetic and sympathetic reactivity moderate maternal contributions to emotional adjustment in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1661-1673. Bean, R. A., Barber, B. K., & Crane, D. R. (2006). Parentalsupport, behavioral control, and psychological control among African American youth. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1335-1355. Beauchaine, T. (2001). Vagal tone, development, and Gray’s motivational theory: Toward an integrated model of autonomic nervous system functioning in psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 183-214. Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885-908. Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 86-89. Blaisdell, K. N.,Imhof, A. M., & Fisher, P. A. (2019). Early adversity, child neglect, and stress neurobiology: From observations of impact to empirical evaluations of mechanisms. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 78, 139-146. Boucsein, W. (1992). Electrodermal activity. New York: NY: Plenum Press. Bowlby, J. (1973).Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: NY: Basic Books. Bunea, I. M., Szentagotai-Tatar, A., & Miu, A. C. (2017). Early-life adversity and cortisol response to social stress: A meta-analysis. Translational Psychiatry, 7, 1274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0032-3 Chen, X., Xu, L., Zeng, C., Zhang, X., Tao, F., & Sun, Y. (2021). Prolonged parent-child separation and pain in adolescence: The role of HPA-axis genetic variations.Journal of Affective Disorders, 292, 255-260. Cummings, E. M., El-Sheikh, M., Kouros, C. D., & Keller, P. S. (2007). Children’s skin conductance reactivity as a mechanism of risk in the context of parental depressive symptoms.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 436-445. El-Sheikh, M., & Erath, S. A. (2011). Family conflict, autonomic nervous system functioning, and child adaptation: State of the science and future directions.Development and Psychopathology, 23(2), 703-721. El-Sheikh, M.,Keiley, M., Erath, S., & Dyer, W. J. (2013). Marital conflict and growth in children’s internalizing symptoms: The role of autonomic nervous system activity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 92-108. El-Sheikh, M., Keller, P. S., & Erath, S. A. (2007). Marital conflict and risk for child maladjustment over time: Skin conductance level reactivity as a vulnerability factor.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(5), 715-727. Gao, L.,Xie, Y., Jia, C., & Wang, W. (2020). Prevalence of depression among Chinese university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-11. Gregson, K. D., Tu, K. M., & Erath, S. A. (2014). Sweating under pressure:Skin conductance level reactivity moderates the association between peer victimization and externalizing behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(1), 22-30. Harlow, H. F., & Zimmermann, R. R. (1959). Affectional response in the infant monkey.Science, 130(3373), 421-432. Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The “Trier Social Stress Test”-A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1-2), 76-81. Kwong, A. S. F., Morris, T. T., Pearson, R. M., Timpson, N. J., Rice, F., Stergiakouli, E., & Tilling, K. (2021). Polygenic risk for depression, anxiety and neuroticism are associated with the severity and rate of change in depressive symptoms across adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(12), 1462-1474. Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Editors-in-chief) and R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.),Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 1-17, 43-61, 542-548). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Li, X.,Coid, J. W., Tang, W., Lv, Q., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., … Li, T. (2021). Sustained effects of left-behind experience during childhood on mental health in Chinese university undergraduates. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(12), 1949-1957. Liu, H., Zhou, Z., Fan, X., Luo, H., Wang, D., Wang, J., … Nawaz, R. (2021). A mixed method study to examine the mental health problems of college students who had left-behind experiences. Journal of Affective Disorders, 292, 149-160. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562. Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders.Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 406-425. Moreira, J. F. G, & Telzer, E. H. (2015). Changes in family cohesion and links to depression during the college transition. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 72-82. Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18(1), 3-28. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401. Stanger, S.,Abaied, J., Wagner, C., & Sanders, W. (2018). Contributions of observed parent socialization of coping and skin conductance level reactivity to childhood adjustment. Family Process, 57(1), 181-194. Steinberg, L., & Avenevoli, S. (2000). The role of context in the development of psychopathology: A conceptual framework and some speculative propositions. Child Development, 71(1), 66-74. Wagner, C. R., & Abaied, J. L. (2016). Skin conductance level reactivity moderates the association between parental psychological control and relational aggression in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 687-700. Weems, C. F.,Zakem, A. H., Costa, N. M., Cannon, M. F., & Watts, S. E. (2005). Physiological response and childhood anxiety: Association with symptoms of anxiety disorders and cognitive bias. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(4), 712-723. Williams, S. K., & Kelly, F. D. (2005). Relationships among involvement, attachment, and behavioral problems in adolescence: Examining father’s influence.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(2), 168-196. Zhao, J., Li, Q., Wang, L., Lin, L., & Zhang, W. (2019). Latent profile analysis of left-behind adolescents’ psychosocial adaptation in rural China. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(6), 1146-1160. 雷雳, 王争艳, 刘红云, 张雷. (2002). 初中生的亲子沟通及其与家庭环境系统和社会适应关系的研究. 应用心理学, 8(1), 14-20. 师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34. 徐夫真, 张文新, 张玲玲. (2009). 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的影响: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 41(12), 1165-1174. 杨洋, 孙铃, 张红川, 黄四林, 朱晓. (2018). 适应负荷: 社会经济地位影响健康的生理机制. 心理科学进展, 26(8), 1475-1487. 章婕, 吴振云, 方格, 李娟, 韩布新, 陈祉妍. (2010). 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立. 中国心理卫生杂志, 24(2), 139-143. 张文新, 王美萍, Andrew Fuligni. (2006). 青少年的自主期望、对父母权威的态度与亲子冲突和亲合. 心理学报, 38(6), 868-876. 张云运, 骆方, 陶沙, 罗良, 董奇. (2015). 家庭社会经济地位与父母教育投资对流动儿童学业成就的影响. 心理科学, 38(1), 19-26. 赵景欣, 栾斐斐, 孙萍, 徐婷婷, 刘霞. (2017). 亲子亲合、逆境信念与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 441-448. 赵景欣, 王秋金, 杨萍, 刘霞. (2017). 行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系: 留守与非留守青少年的比较. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 352-360. |
[1] | 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285. |
[2] | 张永欣, 周宗奎, 丁倩, 魏华. 班级同学关系与青少年外化问题行为:自尊和亲子亲合的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 732-741. |
[3] | 赵景欣, 栾斐斐, 孙萍, 徐婷婷, 刘霞. 亲子亲合、逆境信念与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 441-448. |
[4] | 赵景欣, 王秋金, 杨萍, 刘霞. 行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系:留守与非留守青少年的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 352-360. |
[5] | 赵景欣, 杨萍, 马金玲, 黄翠翠. 歧视知觉与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系:亲子亲合的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 369-376. |
[6] | 赵景欣, 刘霞, 李悦. 日常烦恼与农村留守儿童的偏差行为:亲子亲合的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 400-406,423. |
|