心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 658-666.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.05.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母积极教养与青少年亲社会冒险行为: 有调节的中介模型

冯雪珂1,2, 窦凯1,2, 唐滢2   

  1. 1. 广州大学教育学院心理学系, 广州 510006;
    2. 广州大学教育学院青少年心理与行为研究中心, 广州 510006
  • 发布日期:2024-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 窦凯 E-mail:psydk@gzhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(31800938);广东省哲学社会科学规划2022年度一般项目(GD22CXL05);广州市教育科学规划2021年度重点课题(202113700)。

Positive Parenting and Prosocial Risky Behavior in Adolescents: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model

FENG Xueke1,2, DOU Kai1,2, TANG Ying2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006;
    2. Research Center of Adolescent Psychology and Behavior, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006
  • Published:2024-09-19

摘要: 基于生态系统理论,采用纵向追踪设计对广州市3所中学(初一和高一)共1000名学生的父母积极教养(T1)、亲社会同伴(T2)、风险倾向(T2)和亲社会冒险行为(T1/T2)进行调查(2个时间点,间隔半年),考察父母积极教养与青少年亲社会冒险行为的关系,以及亲社会同伴的中介和风险倾向的调节效应。结果发现:(1) 父母积极教养显著正向预测青少年亲社会冒险行为;(2) 亲社会同伴在父母积极教养与亲社会冒险行为间发挥中介效应;(3) 相比于低风险倾向者而言,积极教养通过促进亲社会同伴交往影响亲社会冒险行为的间接效应在高风险倾向青少年中更为显著。结果揭示了亲社会同伴交往是父母积极教养促进高风险倾向青少年从事亲社会冒险行为的中介机制。

关键词: 父母积极教养, 亲社会冒险行为, 亲社会同伴, 风险倾向, 青少年

Abstract: Based on the ecological system, the present study investigated the relationship among positive parenting (T1), prosocial peers (T2), risk propensity (T2), and prosocial risky behavior (T1/T2), by surveying 1000 middle school students from 3 schools in Guangzhou. This longitudinal study consisted of 2-time points, each 6 months apart. The results indicated that: (1) After controlling the baseline of prosocial risky behavior, positive parenting significantly predicted adolescents’ prosocial risky behavior; (2) Prosocial peers played a mediating role between positive parenting and prosocial risky behavior in adolescents; (3) Compared with the adolescents in low-risk propensity, the mediating effect of prosocial peers between positive parenting and prosocial risky behavior was significantly enhanced in high-risk propensity adolescents. The results revealed that prosocial peers were the mediating mechanism of positive parenting to promote prosocial risky behavior for high-risk propensity adolescents.

Key words: positive parenting, prosocial risky behavior, prosocial peers, risk propensity, adolescence

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Armstrong-Carter, E., Bibby, E. S., Burroughs, M., Flannery, J. E., Nelson, B. W., Duell, N., … Telzer, E. H. (2022). Adolescents are more likely to help others on days they take risks and crave social connections. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(4), 1421-1432.
Bandura, A. (1978).The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344-358.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., Grassetti, S. N., & Morrow, M. T. (2017). Relations between actual group norms, perceived peer behavior, and bystander children's intervention to bullying. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(3), 394-400.
Barrera, M., Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Li, F. Z. (2001). Replication of a problem behavior model with American Indian, Hispanic, and Caucasian youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(2), 133-157.
Batool, S. S., & Lewis, C. A. (2020). Does positive parenting predict pro-social behavior and friendship quality among adolescents? Emotional intelligence as a mediator. Current Psychology, 41(4), 1997-2011.
Blakemore, S. J. (2018).Avoiding social risk in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 116-122.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Bronstein, P., Fox, B. J., Kamon, J. L., & Knolls, M. L. (2007). Parenting and gender as predictors of moral courage in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56(9-10), 661-674.
Brown, B. B., & Bakken, J. P. (2011). Parenting and peer relationships: Reinvigorating research on family-peer linkages in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 153-165.
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243-267.
Crone, E. A., & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K. (2021). Multiple pathways of risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Review, 62, Article 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100996
Do, K. T., Moreira, J. F. G., & Telzer, E. H. (2017). But is helping you worth the risk?Defining prosocial risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 260-271.
Dou, K., Lin, X. Q., & Wang, Y. J. (2020). Negative parenting and risk-taking behaviors in Chinese adolescents: Testing a sequential mediation model in a three-wave longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105631
Duell, N., & Steinberg, L. (2019). Positive risk taking in adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 13(1), 48-52.
Duell, N., & Steinberg, L. (2021). Adolescents take positive risks, too. Developmental Review, 62, Article 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100984
Duell, N., Steinberg, L., Icenogle, G., Chein, J.,Chaudhary, N., Di Giunta, L., … Chang, L. (2017). Age patterns in risk taking across the world. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1052-1072.
Elgar, F. J., Waschbusch, D. A., Dadds, M. R., & Sigvaldason, N. (2007). Development and validation of a short form of the Alabama parenting questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(2), 243-259.
Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., Jazbec, S., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Leibenluft, E., … Pine, D. S. (2005). Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents. Neuroimage, 25(4), 1279-1291.
Farrell, A. D., Thompson, E. L.,& Mehari, K. R. (2017). Dimensions of peer influences and their relationship to adolescents' aggression, other problem behaviors and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1351-1369.
Fryt, J., Szczygiel, M., & Duell, N. (2021). Positive and negative risk taking in adolescence: Age patterns and relations to social environment. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20431
Guo, Q. K., & Feng, L. L. (2017). The associations between perceived parenting styles, empathy, and altruistic choices in economic games: A study of Chinese children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01843
Hastings, P. D., Wshane, K. E., Parker, R., & Ladha, F. (2007). Ready to make nice: Parental socialization of young sons' and daughters' prosocial behaviors with peers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 177-200.
Hofmann, V., & Muller, C. M. (2018). Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates' prosocial behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 68, 136-145.
Ju, C. T., Wu, R. N., Zhang, B. S., You, X. Q., & Luo, Y. (2020).Parenting style, coping efficacy, and risk-taking behavior in Chinese young adults. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, Article e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.24
Lee, C. T., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). The role of parents and peers on adolescents' prosocial behavior and substance use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(7), 1053-1069.
Lee, S. M., Daniels, M. H., & Kissinger, D. B. (2006). Parental influences on adolescent adjustment: Parenting styles versus parenting practices. The Family Journal, 14(3), 253-259.
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26(4), 475-479.
Li, Y., Costanzo, P. R., & Putallaz, M. (2010). Maternal socialization goals, parenting styles, and social-emotional adjustment among Chinese and European American young adults: Testing a mediation model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(4), 330-362.
Luo, J., Wang, M. C.,Gao, Y., Deng, J. X., & Qi, S. S. (2020). Factor structure and construct validity of the emotions as a child scale (EAC) in Chinese children. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 85-97.
Mishra, S., Lalumiere, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616-621.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Fu, X. Y., & Barry, C. M. (2017). Bidirectional relations between parenting and prosocial behavior for Asian and European-American emerging adults. Journal of Adult Development, 25(2), 107-120.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., … Bombi, A. S. (2018). Parental acceptance-rejection and child prosocial behavior: Developmental transactions across the transition to adolescence in nine countries, mothers and fathers, and girls and boys. Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1881-1890.
Ryan, K. K., MacKillop, J., & Carpenter, M. J. (2013). The relationship between impulsivity, risk-taking propensity and nicotine dependence among older adolescent smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 38(1), 1431-1434.
Schriber, R. A., & Guyer, A. E. (2016). Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1-18.
Skaar, N. R. (2021). Confirmation of a reconceptualized definition and measure of adolescent risk behavior: Adolescent viewpoints. Journal of Adolescent Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211064566
Skaar, N. R., Christ, T. J., & Jacobucci, R. (2014). Measuring adolescent prosocial and health risk behavior in schools: Initial development of a screening measure. School Mental Health, 6(2), 137-149.
Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121-127.
Szrek, H., Chao, L. W., Ramlagan, S., & Peltzer, K. (2012). Predicting (un) healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 716-727.
Van Hoorn, J., Crone, E. A., & Van Leijenhorst, L. (2017). Hanging out with the right crowd: Peer influence on risk-taking behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(1), 189-200.
Van Ryzin, M. J., Fosco, G. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Family and peer predictors of substance use from early adolescence to early adulthood: An 11-year prospective analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 37(12), 1314-1324.
Veliz, P. T., Boyd, C. J., & McCabe, S. E. (2015). Competitive sport involvement and substance use among adolescents: A nationwide study. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(2), 156-165.
Walters, G. D. (2020). Prosocial peers as risk, protective, and promotive factors for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 618-630.
Wang, D., Liu, T. R., & Shi, J. N. (2017). Development of monetary and social reward processes. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 11128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11558-6
Wang, L. X., Dou, K., Li, J. B., Zhang, M. C., & Guan, J. Y. (2021). The association between interparental conflict and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: Testing a moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106832
Wang, X. C., Yang, J. P., Wang, P. C., Zhang, Y. X., Li, B., Xie, X. C., & Lei, L. (2019). Deviant peer affiliation and bullying perpetration in adolescents: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Psychology, 154(3), 199-213.
Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Nye, C. D. (2019). Development and validation of the general risk propensity scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 152-167.
Zhao, F. Q., Liu, M. X., & Li, S. (2020). Paternal coparenting behavior and adolescent prosocial behaviors: Roles of parent-child attachment, peer attachment, and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105629
Zhou, Z. X., Qu, Y., & Li, X. R. (2022). Parental collectivism goals and Chinese adolescents' prosocial behaviors: The mediating role of authoritative parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(4), 766-779.
窦凯, 黄义婷, 李菁菁, 聂衍刚. (2020). 青少年亲社会冒险行为量表的修订及信效度检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(10), 1538-1542.
张文新, 李曦, 陈光辉, 曹衍淼. (2021). 母亲积极教养与青少年亲社会行为:共情的中介作用与OXTR基因的调节作用. 心理学报, 53(9), 976-991.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
周荃, 肖晶, 何莉, 赵德懋, 邢淑芬. (2016). “脆弱性”还是“可塑性”:差别易感性模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 747-751.
[1] 郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5] 王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响:自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[6] 李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[7] 向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[8] 边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[9] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[10] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[11] 王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[12] 陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[13] 汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[14] 张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.
[15] 彭大炬, 程诚, 郭培杨, 许洋. 青少年冷酷无情特质和边缘人格特质的共同风险因素模型:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 528-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!