心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 654-662.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异

刘庆1, 冯兰2   

  1. 1. 长江大学社会救助研究中心, 荆州 434000;
    2. 华中农业大学文法学院, 武汉 430070
  • 发布日期:2023-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘庆 E-mail:liuqing810501@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BSH069)。

The Mediating Role of Parenting between Parents' Marital Quality and Adolescents' Sibling Relationship and Its Gender Difference

LIU Qing1, FENG Lan2   

  1. 1. Research Center for Social Assistance, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434000;
    2. College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070
  • Published:2023-09-11
  • Supported by:
    The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1905301);National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078115,21776108,21690083,22008078).

摘要: 采用纵向设计,以湖北省某地区457名来自全同胞家庭的青少年为被试,进行3次追踪调查,考察了教养方式在父母婚姻质量与青少年同胞关系间的中介作用及性别差异。研究发现:(1)控制了性别、年龄段和家庭的经济状况,父母的婚姻质量能直接预测青少年的同胞关系,还能通过教养方式进而显著预测青少年的同胞关系,教养方式起到部分中介作用;(2)教养方式的中介作用存在显著的性别差异。严厉教养在父母婚姻质量与男生同胞关系之间的中介效应大于女生,积极教养在父母婚姻质量与女生同胞关系之间的中介效应大于男生。研究结果对于青少年同胞关系的干预具有一定启示意义。

关键词: 父母婚姻质量, 教养方式, 同胞关系, 青少年

Abstract: The current longitudinal study explored the mediating effect of parenting between marital quality and adolescents' sibling relationship.The gender difference of the effect was also explored.A sample of 457 adolescents was recruited from six junior middle schools and five senior high schools.Results were as follows:(1) Positive parenting and harsh parenting mediated the relation between marital quality and adolescents' sibling relationship when key demographic variables were controlled;(2) There were also significant gender differences in the mediating effect of the parenting:harsh parenting had stronger influenceson boys than on girls,compared with positive parenting which had stronger mediating effect on girls than on boys.These findings have important implications on intervention and improvement of sibling relationship for adolescents.

Key words: parental marital quality, parenting, sibling relationship, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Chandler, A. L. (1999). Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent-child dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 49- 61.
Barnow, S., Lucht, M., & Freyberger, H. J. (2005). Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 24-39.
Belsky, J., Youngblade, L., & Volling, R. B. (1991). Patterns of marital change and parent-child interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(2),487-498.
Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & Mccoy, J. K. (1994). Contributions of family relationships and child temperaments to longitudinal variations in sibling relationship quality and sibling relationship styles.Journal of Family Psychology, 8(3), 274-286.
Chang, L., Lansford, J. E., Schwartz, D., & Farver, J. M. (2004). Marital quality, maternal depressed affect, harshparenting, and child externalising in Hong Kong Chinese families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(4), 311-318.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parentingstyleascontext: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 487-496.
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E.M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 387-411.
Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2004). Toward an integration of family systems and developmental psychopathology approaches. Development and Psychopathology, 16(3), 477-481.
Davies, P. T., & Woitach, M. J. (2008). Children’s emotional security in the interparental relationship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 269-274.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658.
Easterbrooks, M. A., & Emde, R. N. (1998). Marital and parent-child relationship: Role of affect in the familysystem. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp.83-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 108-132.
Fabricius, W.V. (2003). Listening to childrenofdivorce:New findings that diverge from Wallerstein, Lewis, and Blakeslee. Family Relations, 52(4), 385-396.
Feinberg, M. E., Solmeyer, A. R, & McHale, S. M. (2012).The third rail of family systems:Sibling relationships, mental and behavioral health, and preventive intervention in childhood and adolescence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(1), 43-57.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D.(1985). Children’s perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Development, 56(2), 448-461.
Hakvoort, E. M., Bos, H. W., Balen, F. V., & Hermanns, J. A. (2010). Family relationships and the psychosocial adjustment of school-aged children in intact families. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(2), 182-201.
Jenkins, J., Rasbash. J., Leckie, G., Gass, K., & Dunn, J. (2012). The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: A multilevel study of multiple dyads per family. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(6), 622-629.
Kim, I. J., Ge, X., Conger, R. D., Brody, G. H., & Gibbons, F. X. (2003). Parenting behaviors and the occurrence and co-occurrence of depressive symptoms and conduct problems among African American Children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(4), 571-583.
Kouros, C. D., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Early trajectory interparental conflict and externalizing problems as predictors of social competence in preadolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 355-364.
MacKinnon, C. E. (1989). An observational investigation of sibling interactions in married and divorced families.Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 36-44.
Melby, J. N., & Conger, R. D. (2001). The Iowa family interaction rating scales: Instrument summary. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family Observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp.33-58). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olson, D.H., Russell, S., & Sprenkle, D. (1983). Circumpolar model of marital and family systems: Theoretical update. Family Process, 22(1), 69-83.
Rose, A.J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98-131.
Ruff, S. C., Durtschi, J. A., & Day, R. D. (2018). Family subsystems predicting adolescents’ perceptions of sibling relationship quality over time. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4(3), 527-542.
Scholte, R., Rutger, C. M., Engels, R., & Raymond, A. T. (2007). Differential parental treatment, sibling relationships and delinquency in adolescence. Journal Youth Adolescence, 36(5), 661-671.
Schoppe-Sullivan,S. J.,Mangelsdorf, S. C.,Brown,G.L.,& Sokolowski, M.S.(2007). Goodness-of-fit in family context: Infant temperament, marital quality, and early coparenting behavior. Infant Behavior & Development, 30, 82-96.
Song, H., & Volling, B. L. (2015). Coparenting and children’s temperament predict firstborns’ cooperation in the care of an infant sibling.Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 130-135.
Stocker, C. M., Ahmed, K., & Stall, M. (1997). Marital satisfaction and maternal emotional expressiveness: Links with children’s sibling relationships. Social Development, 6(3), 373-385.
Stroud, C., Durbin, C. E., Wilson, S., & Mendelsohn, K. A. (2011). Spillover to triadic and dyadic systems in familieswith young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(6), 919-930.
Tippett, N., & Wolke, D. (2015). Aggression between siblings Associations with the home environment and peer bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 14-24.
Updegraff, A., McHale, M., & Whiteman, D., (2005). Adolescent sibling relationships in Mexican American families: Exploring the role of familism. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(4), 512-522.
Witt, M. G., & Wood, W. (2010). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62(9), 635-646.
Wong, M. S., McElwain, N. L., & Halberstadt. A. G. (2009). Parent, family, and child characteristics: Associations with mother and father reported emotion socialization practices. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(4), 452-463.
Yu, J. J., & Gamble, W. C. (2008). Pathways of influence: Marital relationships and their association with parenting styles and sibling relationship quality. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17(6), 757-778.
Zimet, D.M., & Jacob, T. (2001). Influences of marital conflict on child adjustment: Review of theory and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(4), 319-335.
边思倩, 胡幼芳. (2019). 同胞关系的影响因素研究进展. 中国儿童保健杂志, 27(4), 404-406.
陈斌斌, 赵语, 韩雯, 王逸辰, 吴嘉雯, 岳新宇, 吴英挺. (2017).手足之情:同胞关系的类型、影响因素及对儿童发展的作用机制. 心理科学进展, 25(12), 2168-2178.
陈玲玲, 伍新春, 刘畅. (2014).父母的婚姻满意度对父亲教养投入的影响:父母协同教养的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(3),268-276.
董颖红. (2018). 被忽视的家庭关系——同胞关系对个体心理和行为发展的影响. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.
李庆功, 吴素芳, 傅根跃. (2015). 儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳的关系:社会行为的中介效应及其性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 303-310.
梁宗保, 张光珍, 邓慧华, 宋媛, 郑文明, 孙铃.(2013). 婚姻关系到亲子关系:父母情绪表达的中介作用. 心理学报, 45 (12), 1355-1367.
孙丽华, 张安然. (2018). 不同家庭教养方式下二孩同胞关系的调查研究. 上海教育科研, 8, 59-63.
王明珠, 邹泓, 李晓巍, 张文娟, 王英芊, 蒋索.(2015). 幼儿父母婚姻冲突与教养方式的关系:父母情绪调节策略的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 279-286.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
张晓娟, 芦珊, 刘松涛, 高海波, 刘海艳, 马焕明. (2018). 不同年龄段青少年同胞关系的调查. 中国健康心理学杂志, 26(2), 305-308.
郑治国, 廖华, 施怡君, 张慧. (2020). 二胎环境下小学高年级“脱独”儿童父母教养方式与同胞关系: 心理理论的中介作用. 心理学探新, 40(4), 377-384.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[5] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!