家庭社会经济地位与大学新生短期择偶态度:基于潜变量增长建模的分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在考察大学新生短期择偶态度的变化轨迹,以及家庭客观经济地位对大学新生短期择偶态度的影响及其性别差异。采用社会性性态度问卷与家庭社会经济地位问卷,以贵州省某高校的942名大一新生为研究对象进行每月1次共4次的追踪调查。潜变量增长建模与群组分析的结果表明:(1)新生的短期择偶态度呈线性增长趋势且具有显著的性别差异,即男性的初始水平和增长速度均高于女性;(2)家庭SES正向预测短期择偶态度的初始水平且能显著减缓短期择偶态度的增长速度,同时该预测作用不具有性别差异。研究结果支持了性策略理论与生活史理论的观点;同时,为大学新生入学过渡期内的适应教育与性安全教育提出了建议。

关键词: 纵向研究, 短期择偶策略, 入学转折期, 随意性行为态度, 社会地位

Abstract: This study aims to explore the developmental trajectory of freshmen's attitudes towards short-term mating, as well as the role of family socioeconomic status (SES) on college freshmen's attitudes towards short-term mating and sex differences. With the attitude subscale of Sociosexual Orientation Inventory and the family socioeconomic status questionnaire, 942 freshmen from a college in Guizhou province were investigated once a month, 4 times in total. The results of latent growth modeling and multi-group latent growth model analysis showed that: (1) Freshmen's attitudes towards short-term mating increased linearly and there were significant sex differences. Specifically, both initial levels and increasing rates among males were higher than those of females; (2) Family SES positively predicted the initial levels of attitudes towards short-term mating and significantly slowed down the increasing rates of attitudes towards short-term mating. The role of family SES was similar for both males and females. The results of the current study supported the views of sexual strategy theory and life history theory. At the same time, practical suggestions were also provided for the freshmen's education of adaptation and sexual safety during the transition period.

Key words: longitudinal study, short-term mating strategies, transition, attitudes towards casual sex, social status

中图分类号:

B844

丁芳媛, 杨义滢, 王阳茜, 贾云丞, 程刚. 家庭社会经济地位与大学新生短期择偶态度:基于潜变量增长建模的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 663-672.

DING Fangyuan, YANG Yiying, WANG Yangqian, JIA Yuncheng, CHENG Gang. Family Socioeconomic Status and College Freshmen's Attitudes towards Short-term Mating: An Analysis Based on Latent Growth Modeling[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 663-672.

参考文献

Asendorpf, J. B., Penke, L., & Back, M. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25(1),16-30.
Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (2010). Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; Reproductive decisions in human mate choice.Ethology, 103(8), 681-699.
Besser, A., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2014). Positive personality features and stress among first-year university students: Implications for psychological distress, functional impairment, and self-esteem.Self and Identity, 13(1), 24-44.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Buss, D. M. (Ed). (2016). The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Volume 1: Foundation, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Sexualstrategies theory. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1-5). New York, NY: Springer.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Matepreferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 1-34.
Campbell, L., & Ellis, B. J. (2005).Commitment, love, and mate retention. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 419-442). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons.
Chung, J. M., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Noftle, E. E., Roberts, B. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2014). Continuity and change in self-esteem during emerging adulthood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 469-483.
Cohen, M. J., & Wade, T. J. (2012). Individual differences in first and fourth year college women's short term mating strategy preferences. Psychology, 3(11), 966-973.
Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (2019). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1528-1558.
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 1-21.
Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 88-114). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Li, F. (1998). A comparison of model‐ and multiple imputation‐based approaches to longitudinal analyses with partial missingness.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 1-21.
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2019). Relationship trajectories: A meta-theoretical framework and theoretical applications. Psychological Inquiry, 30(1). 1-28.
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2014). The mate value scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 64(4), 72-77.
Ellis, B. J., & Essex, M. J. (2010). Family environments, adrenarche, and sexual maturation: A longitudinal test of a life history model. Child Development, 78(6),1799-1817.
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk. Human Nature, 20(2),204-268.
Ellis, B. J., & Marco, D. G. (2019). Developmental adaptation to stress: An evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 111-139.
Galipaud, M., & Kokko, H. (2020). Adaptation and plasticity in life-history theory: How to derive predictions.Evolution & Human Behavior, 41(6),493-501.
Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Johnston, R. A. (2008).Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling. Annals of Regional Science, 42(2), 341-356.
Gray, P. B., Garcia, J. R., & Gesselman, A. N. (2019).Age-related patterns in sexual behaviors and attitudes among single U.S. Adults: An evolutionary approach. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 111-126.
Jonason, P. K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for implementing a short-term mating strategy.Personality & Individual Differences, 52(5), 606-610.
Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2013). Casualhook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective associations with attitudes about sex and love relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1451-1462.
Kim, A., Bradshaw, H., Durante, K. M., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Life history, fertility, and short-term mating motivation. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918800062
Li, Y., Fu, T., & Wei, W. (2012). The Changes of Students' stressors and coping styles from high school to college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psychological Science, 35(2), 396-400.
Li, Y. M., Li, J., Chan, D. K. S., & Zhang, B. (2016). Whenlove meets money: Priming the possession of money influences mating strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00387
Lippa, R. A. (2007). Sexdifferences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 631-651.
Liu, J., Cheng, M., Wei, X., & Yu, N. N. (2020).The Internet-driven sexual revolution in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, Article 119911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119911
Lyons, H., Manning, W., Giordano, P., & Longmore, M. (2013). Predictors of heterosexual casual sex among young adults.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 585-593.
Lyu, J., Shen, X., & Therese, H. (2020). Sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among undergraduate students in china-implications for sex education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), Article 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186716
March, E., & Grieve, R. (2016). Social-economic theory and short-term mate preferences: The effects of gender roles and socioeconomic status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68(4), 241-250.
Marlowe, F. W. (2003). The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample. Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing Newsletter IEEE, 37(3), 282-306.
Međedović, J. (2019). Lifehistory in a postconflict society: Violent intergroup conflict facilitates fast life-history strategy. Human Nature, 30(1), 59-70.
Menon, J. A., Mwaba, S. O. C., Thankian, K., & Lwatula, C. (2016). Risky sexual behaviour among university students.International STD Research & Reviews, 4(1), 1-7.
Millar, M. G., Westfall, R. S., & Walsh, M. (2019). The moderating effects of mate-value on the relationship between perceived sex ratio and mating strategies.Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 39-43.
Monto, M. A., & Carey, A. G. (2014). Anew standard of sexual behavior? Are claims associated with the “hookup culture” supported by general social survey data? The Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 605-615.
OECD. (2012).PISA 2009 Technical Report (pp.312-313). Paris:OECD Publishing.
Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Effectsof gender and psychosocial factors on "friends with benefits" relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 311-320.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113-1135.
Pittman, L. D., & Richmond, A. (2008). University belonging, friendship quality, and psychological adjustment during the transition to college. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(4), 343-362.
Preacher, K. J. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 227-259.
Rodrigues, D. L., Lopes, D., Pereira, M., De Visser, R., & Cabaceira, I. (2019). Sociosexualattitudes and quality of life in (non)monogamous relationships: The role of attraction and constraining forces among users of the second love web site. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1795-1809.
Salmon, C. (2017). Long-term romantic relationships: Adaptationist approaches. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 121-130.
Sandberg-Thoma, S. E., & Dush, C. M. K. (2014). Casual sexual relationships and mental health in adolescence and emerging adulthood. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 121-130.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247-311.
Sheppard, P., Pearce, M. S., & Sear, R. (2016). How does childhood socioeconomic hardship affect reproductive strategy? Pathways of development.American Journal of Human Biology, 28(3), 356-363.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870-883.
Simpson, J. A., Wilson, C. L., & Winterheld, H. A. (2004).Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 87-111). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: Preferences for long- and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables.Evolution & Human Behavior, 39(1), 82-93.
Townsend, J. M., Jonason, P. K., & Wasserman, T. H. (2020). Associations between motives for casual sex, depression, self-esteem, and sexual victimization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1189-1197.
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012).Structural equation modeling with mplus: Methods and applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one.Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 917-922.
Wu, L., Xiao, Y., Chen, Y., & Cheng, G. (2021). Family socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and achievement motivation among Chinese college freshmen: A latent growth modeling approach.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2141-2161.
Yamasaki, K. L. (2012). College students and hookup behavior. Undergraduate Research Journal at the University of Northern Colorado, 2(2), 221-234.
程刚, 林楠, 张文, 龙女, 谢婷, 张大均. (2020). 家庭客观经济地位与班级同伴地位的关系:父母教育卷入与心理素质的中介作用. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 42(2), 15-21.
程刚, 张大均, 肖友琴, 关雨生, 陈艳红. (2016). 大学新生主观社会地位与抑郁的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 753-760.
崔婧晨, 张欣, 常春, 孙昕霙, 范欣颐, 史宇晖. (2019). 2006年与2016年北京市大学生安全性行为及意向的对比研究. 中华疾病控制杂志, 23(10), 1191-1195.
关守义. (2009). 克龙巴赫α系数研究述评. 心理科学, 32(3), 685-687.
黄梅香, 肖瑶, 王舒梵. (2020). 互联网背景下广州市6所高校大学生性观念和性行为现状调查. 中国性科学, 29(10), 157-160.
李春玲. (2005). 当代中国社会的声望分层——职业声望与社会经济地位指数测量. 社会学研究, (2), 74-102+244.
林镇超, 王燕. (2015). 生命史理论:进化视角下的生命发展观. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 721-728.
刘伟.(2011).社交性性取向量表在中国城市人群中的应用(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
潘绥铭. (2017). 给“全性”留下历史证据. 香港: 1908有限公司.
吴迪. (2020). 性观念与性行为错位状况下的个体适应性研究. 中国性科学, 29(7), 146-148.
张林, 刘燊, 李玥, 阮鲁君. (2016). 异性拒绝对大学生择偶行为的长期影响:基于社会计量器理论的探讨. 心理科学, 39(1), 131-136.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	李何慧, 陶伍海, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. 发展性阅读障碍与脑异常的因果关系:研究范式及发现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 631-640.
[2]	程刚, 张大均, 肖友琴, 关雨生, 陈艳红. 大学新生主观社会地位与抑郁的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 753-760.
[3]	陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 594-600.
[4]	夏勇. 纵向研究的取样和测量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1996, 12(4): 31-34.