心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 12-21.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.01.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    

青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素

郭滢1,2, 陈晓丹1,3, 刘文志1,4, 刘雨彤1,5, 朱皕1,2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究院, 北京 100875;
    3. 南山外国语学校(集团)高级中学, 深圳 518000;
    4. 沧州师范学院教育学院, 沧州 061001;
    5. 郑州市第五十六高级中学, 郑州 451450
  • 发布日期:2025-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 朱皕 E-mail:zhubi@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31971000)。

Development of Semantic False Memories in Adolescents: Study and Test Factors

GUO Ying1,2, CHEN Xiaodan1,3, LIU Wenzhi1,4, LIU Yutong1,5, ZHU Bi1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Nanshan Foreign Language Senior High School, Shenzhen 518000;
    4. School of Education, Cangzhou Normal University, Cangzhou 061001;
    5. Zhengzhou No. 56 High School, Zhengzhou 451450
  • Published:2025-01-22

摘要: 该研究以中文词语为材料,用3个实验考察青少年语义错误记忆的发展以及学习视听通道和测验间隔时间的影响。实验1比较初中生、高中生和大学生的回忆。实验2对比高中生和大学生在立即测验和一周后延迟测验中的再认。实验3对比高中生和大学生在视、听学习后的再认。结果发现:初、高中生的错误回忆低于大学生,而初中生的真实回忆低于高中生和大学生(实验1)。测验间隔时间的延长会降低真实再认,增加错误再认,并且立即测验时,高中生的真实再认低于大学生,而错误再认无年龄差异;延迟测验时,高中生的真实和错误再认均低于大学生(实验2)。高中生和大学生在视觉学习后的立即视觉测验中都比听觉学习后的真实再认高且错误再认低,该效应没有年龄差异(实验3)。该结果反映了青少年字面和要旨记忆发展,支持了模糊痕迹理论,也便于我们更加深入理解青少年的记忆发展。

关键词: 记忆发展, 错误记忆, 中学生, 大学生, 学习测验

Abstract: This study investigated the development of semantic false memories in Chinese adolescents, and explored the effect of learning and testing on adolescents’ semantic false memories by comparing visual versus auditory studies and immediate versus delayed tests. Experiment 1 examined the differences in semantic false recall among middle school, high school and college students. Experiment 2 explored the differences in semantic false recognition between high school and college students on immediate and delayed one-week tests. Experiment 3 explored the differences in semantic false recognition between high school and college students after visual and auditory learning. Results showed that semantic false recall of middle and high school students was lower than that of college students, while true recall of middle school students was lower than that of high school and college students (Experiment 1). Prolonged testing intervals led to a decrease in true recognition and an increase in false recognition. Specifically, high school students had lower true recognition rates and comparable false recognition rates than college students in the immediate test, while high school students had both lower true and false recognition rates than college students in the delayed test (Experiment 2). Both high school students and college students had higher true recognition and lower false recognition in the immediate visual test after visual learning than after auditory learning, with no age group differences (Experiment 3). In support of fuzzy trace theory, these findings illustrate the development of verbatim and gist traces and may help us to understand the memory development of adolescents.

Key words: memory development, false memory, middle and high school students, college students, learning and testing

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Abadie, M., & Camos, V. (2019). False memory at short and long term.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 1312-1334.
Andrade, M. Â., & Raposo, A. (2021). Underdeveloped recollection during adolescence: Semantic elaboration and inhibition as underlying mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105044
Brainerd, C. J. (2013). Developmental reversals in false memory: A new look at the reliability of children’s evidence.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 335-341.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 164-169.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2012). Reliability of children’s testimony in the era of developmental reversals.Developmental Review, 32(3), 224-267.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2015). Fuzzy-trace theory and lifespan cognitive development.Developmental Review, 38, 89-121.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory.Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 343-382.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Forrest, T. J. (2002). Are young children susceptible to the false-memory illusion?Child Development, 73(5), 1363-1377.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Holliday, R. E. (2018). Developmental reversals in false memory: Development is complementary, not compensatory. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1773-1784.
Carneiro, P., Albuquerque, P., Fernandez, A., & Esteves, F. (2007). Analyzing false memories in children with associative lists specific for their age.Child Development, 78(4), 1171-1185.
Dang, X., Zhu, B., Chen, C., & Li, X. (2020). Age differences in false memories for visual scenes and the effect of prior recall.Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.26
Fandakova, Y., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Sander, M. C. (2020). (Only) time can tell: Age differences in false memory are magnified at longer delays.Psychology and Aging, 35(4), 473-483.
Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 339-353.
Ghetti, S., & Angelini, L. (2008). The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: Evidence from the dual-process signal detection model. Child Development, 79(2), 339-358.
Ghetti, S., Qin, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). False memories in children and adults:Age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 705-718.
Holliday, R. E., Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2011). Developmental reversals in false memory: Now you see them, now you don't!Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 442-449.
Holliday, R. E., Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Recall of details never experienced: Effects of age, repetition, and semantic cues.Cognitive Development, 23(1), 67-78.
Howe, M. L. (2008). Visual distinctiveness and the development of children’s false memories.Child Development, 79(1), 65-79.
Howe, M. L., Candel, I., Otgaar, H., Malone, C., & Wimmer, M. C. (2010). Valence and the development of immediate and long-term false memory illusions.Memory, 18(1), 58-75.
Howe, M. L., Wimmer, M. C., Gagnon, N., & Plumpton, S. (2009). An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions.Journal of Memory and Language, 60(2), 229-251.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(2), 139-154.
Khanna, M. M., & Cortese, M. J. (2009). Children and adults are differentially affected by presentation modality in the DRM paradigm.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 859-877.
Knott, L. M., & Thorley, C. (2014). Mood-congruent false memories persist over time.Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 903-912.
Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 100-104.
Luciana, M., Bjork, J. M., Nagel, B. J., Barch, D. M., Gonzalez, R., Nixon, S. J., & Banich, M. T. (2018). Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 67-79.
McGuire, K., London, K., & Wright, D. B. (2015). Developmental trends in false memory across adolescence and young adulthood: A comparison of DRM and memory conformity paradigms. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 334-344.
Olszewska, J. M., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Munier, E., & Bendler, S. A. (2015). Misremembering what you see or hear: Dissociable effects of modality on short- and long-term false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1316-1325.
Oliveira, H. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Saraiva, M. (2019). Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 570-578.
Otgaar, H., Peters, M., & Howe, M. L. (2012). Dividing attention lowers children's but increases adults' false memories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 204-210.
Reyna, V. F. (2000). Fuzzy-trace theory and source monitoring: An evaluation of theory and false-memory data. Learning and Individual Differences, 12(2), 163-175.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning and Individual Differences, 7(1), 1-75.
Reyna, V. F., Estrada, S. M., DeMarinis, J. A., Myers, R. M., Stanisz, J. M., & Mills, B. A. (2011). Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1125-1142.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803-814.
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., & Martin, R. C. (2009). A modality congruency effect in verbal false memory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 473-483.
Schacter, D. L., Guerin, S. A., & St Jacques, P. L. (2011). Memory distortion:An adaptive perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 467-474.
Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Kopecky, J. J., Price, C. A., Rothschild, L., Fung, N. S., & Schwartz, M. A. (2002). Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1054-1064.
Sekeres, M. J., Bonasia, K., St-Laurent, M., Pishdadian, S., Winocur, G., Grady, C., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Recovering and preventing loss of detailed memory: Differential rates of forgetting for detail types in episodic memory.Learning & Memory, 23(2), 72-82.
Skalaban, L. J., Cohen, A. O., Conley, M. I., Lin, Q., Schwartz, G. N., Ruiz-Huidobro, N., … Casey, B. J. (2022). Adolescent-specific memory effects: Evidence from working memory, immediate and long-term recognition memory performance in 8-30yr olds.Learning & Memory, 29(8), 223-233.
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 710-715.
Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). Adultage differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect on false recall. Psychology and Aging, 20(3), 486-492.
Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories.Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 494-500.
Thapar, A., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 424-432.
Zhang, W., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2018). If you're happy and you know it: Positive moods reduce age-related differences in false memory. Child Development, 89(4), e332-e341.
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Shao, X., Liu, W., Ye, Z., Zhuang, L., … Xue, G. (2019). Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(9), 3466-3475.
窦刚, 胡娟, 郭秀艳. (2011). 儿童错误记忆研究的新进展: 错误记忆中的发展性逆转. 辽宁师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 34(5), 51-53.
黄一帆, 王大华, 肖红蕊, 姜薇. (2014). DRM 范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制. 心理发展与教育, 30(1), 24-30.
贾永萍, 周楚, 李林, 郭秀艳. (2016). 汉字的无线索回忆再认效应: 重复学习和重复测验的作用. 心理学报, 48(2), 111-120.
刘泽文, 郭谦, 葛列众. (2010). 两种视觉特征提示对儿童错误记忆发展的影响. 心理学报, 42(3), 406-414.
屈晓兰, 凌宇, 孟红, 陈屈峰. (2017). 儿童句子错误记忆: 发展性逆转现象及精加工推理效应. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 265-272.
屈晓兰, 曾萍, 王思非. (2020). 基于同义关联的句子错误记忆: 发展性逆转现象及句式效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(3), 332-338.
杨治良, 周楚, 万璐璐, 谢锐. (2006). 短时间延迟条件下错误记忆的遗忘. 心理学报, 38(1), 1-6.
周楚, 杨治良. (2004). 错误记忆研究范式评介. 心理科学, 27(4), 909-912.
[1] 史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.
[2] 贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[3] 李娇娇, 徐碧波, 袁海龙, 尹锡杨. 社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.
[4] 苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫. 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标:个人中心分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 572-588.
[5] 胡志琴, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络欺凌的关系:道德推脱的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 346-356.
[6] 王蕾, 邴倩, 赵景欣. 亲子分离背景下的亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 403-411.
[7] 薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧. 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 421-430.
[8] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[9] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[10] 樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系:外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[11] 张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响:无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[12] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[13] 何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[14] 杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[15] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!