不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用分离句子范式,通过控制主干事实呈现语言和整合事实提问语言创造单语条件和双语条件,用两个实验探究了不同执行功能水平的成年大学生在单语条件和双语条件下记忆整合的表现。结果发现,编码阶段两个主干事实的呈现语言会对记忆整合产生影响,主干事实都以优势语呈现时,记忆整合表现最好;双语条件下,当主干事实一以优势语呈现时,记忆整合表现相对更好。整合事实的提问语言也会对记忆整合产生影响,整合效果随着提问语言与编码语言之间切换难度的增加而下降。无论何种语言条件,高执行功能组的记忆整合表现都优于低执行功能组。此外,执行功能和编码语言条件具有交互作用,而与提取语言条件无交互作用。这表明,执行功能和语言条件对于记忆整合的影响会因为加工阶段的不同而有所区别。

关键词: 记忆整合, 语言条件, 大学生, 执行功能

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted using a separate sentence paradigm to investigate memory integration performance in monolingual and bilingual conditions for adult college students with varying levels of executive functioning. The study controlled for presentation language and questioning language to create monolingual and bilingual conditions. The study found that the presentation language of the stem fact during the encoding stage had an impact on memory integration. Specifically, better performance was observed when the first stem fact was presented in the dominant language. Additionally, the questioning language of the integrated fact influenced memory integration, and the integration effect decreased as the difficulty of switching between the questioning language and the encoding language increased. Furthermore, the study found that executive function interacted with the encoding language condition but not with the retrieval language condition. This suggests that the effects of executive function and language condition on memory integration varied depending on the processing stage.

Key words: memory integration, language conditions, college students, executive functions

中图分类号:

B844

赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.

ZHAO Xiaomei, CHENG Shi, LIU Zihan, LIU Hong. The Effects of Different Language Conditions and Executive Functions on Memory Integration in College Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.

参考文献

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D.(2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242-275.
Badham, S. P., Poirier, M., Gandhi, N., Hadjivassiliou, A., & Maylor, E. A.(2016). Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 758-770.
Bauer, P. J.(2021). We know more than we ever learned: Processes involved in accumulation of world knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 15(4), 220-227.
Bauer, P. J., Blue, S. N., Xu, A., & Esposito, A. G.(2016). Productive extension of semantic memory in school-aged children: Relations with reading comprehension and deployment of cognitive resources. Developmental Psychology, 52(7), 1024-1037.
Bauer, P. J., Esposito, A. G., & Daly, J. J.(2020). Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge. Learning & Instruction, 66(C), 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101271
Bauer, P. J., & Jackson, F. L.(2015). Semantic elaboration: ERPs reveal rapid transition from novel to known. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 271-282.
Bauer, P. J., & Larkina, M.(2017). Realizing Relevance: The Influence of Domain-Specific Information on Generation of New Knowledge through Integration in 4- to 8-Year-Old Children. Child Development, 88(1), 247-262.
Bauer, P. J., & San Souci, P.(2010). Going beyond the facts: Young children extend knowledge by integrating episodes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 452-465.
Bauer, P. J., & Varga, N. L.(2017). Similarity and deviation in event segmentation and memory integration: Commentary on Richmond, Gold, & Zacks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 124-128.
Bauer, P. J., Varga, N. L., King, J. E., Nolen, A. M., & White, E. A.(2015). Semantic Elaboration through Integration: Hints Both Facilitate and Inform the Process. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(2), 351-369.
Bosma, E., & Nota, N.(2020). Cognate facilitation in Frisian-Dutch bilingual children’s sentence reading: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 189, 104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104699
Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P.(2018). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801-826.
Chung, K. K. H., Li, X., Lam, C. B., Fung, W. K., & Liu, C.(2022). What Predicts First‐ and Second‐Language Difficulties? Testing Language and Executive Functioning Skills as Correlates. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 37(2), 85-99.
Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., Ahmed, Y., Barnes, M. A., Taylor, W. P., & Gerst, E. H.(2019). Executive Function: Association with Multiple Reading Skills. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1819-1846.
Crescioni, A. W., Ehrlinger, J., Alquist, J. L., Conlon, K. E., Baumeister, R. F., Schatschneider, C., & Dutton, G. R.(2011). High trait self-control predicts positive health behaviors and success in weight loss. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(5), 750-759.
Dugan, J. A., & Bauer, P. J.(2022). Putting the pieces together: Cognitive correlates of self-derivation of new knowledge in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 221, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105441
Esposito, A. G., & Bauer, P. J.(2018). Building a knowledge base: Predicting self-derivation through integration in 6- to 10-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 176, 55-72.
Esposito, A. G., & Bauer, P. J.(2019). Self-derivation through memory integration under low surface similarity conditions: The case of multiple languages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 187, 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.07.001
Farah, R., Coalson, R. S., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., & Horowitz-Kraus, T.(2019). Children Use Regions in the Visual Processing and Executive Function Networks during a Subsequent Memory Reading Task. Cerebral Cortex, 29(12), 5180-5189.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G.(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P.(2013). Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 134-141.
Gross, J., Gardiner, B., & Hayne, H.(2016). Developmental reversals in recognition memory in children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(1), 52-59.
Gross, M. C., Lopez, E., Buac, M., & Kaushanskaya, M.(2019). Processing of code-switched sentences by bilingual children: Cognitive and linguistic predictors. Cognitive Development, 52, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100821
Hernandez, A. E., Martinez, A., & Kohnert, K.(2000). In search of the language switch: An fMRI study of picture naming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Brain and Language, 73(3), 421-431.
Kheder, S., & Kaan, E.(2021). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Proficiency and code-switching both matter. Cognition, 209, 104575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104575
Kim, D., & Runco, M. A.(2022). Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Bilingualism and Creativity. Journal of Creativity, 32(3), 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100032
Kwakkel, H., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & Segers, E.(2021). The impact of lexical skills and executive functioning on L1 and L2 phonological awareness in bilingual kindergarten. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102009
Mechie, I. R., Plaisted-Grant, K., & Cheke, L. G.(2021). How does episodic memory develop in adolescence? Learning & Memory, 28(6), 204-217.
Ong, G., McKague, M., Weekes, B., & Sewell, D. K.(2019). Diffusing the bilingual lexicon: Task-based and lexical components of language switch costs. Cognitive Psychology, 114, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101225
Peeters, D., Runnqvist, E., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J.(2014). Asymmetrical switch costs in bilingual language production induced by reading words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 284-292.
Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. … Tao, S.(2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48-76.
Poirier, M., Nairne, J. S., Morin, C., Zimmermann, F. G. S., Koutmeridou, K., & Fowler, J.(2012). Memory as discrimination: A challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 16-29.
Rogers R. D., & Monsell S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 124(2), 207-231.
Service, E., Simola, M., Metsänheimo, O., & Maury, S.(2002). Bilingual working memory span is affected by language skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(3), 383-407.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J.(1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 5-42.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M.(1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373.
van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S.(2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27(3), 497-504.
Varga, N. L., & Bauer, P. J.(2013). Effects of delays on 6-year-old children’s self-generation and retention of knowledge through integration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2), 326-341.
Varga, N. L., & Bauer, P. J.(2017). Young adults self-derive and retain new factual knowledge through memory integration. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 1014-1027.
Varga, N. L., & Manns, J. R.(2021). Delta-modulated cortical alpha oscillations support new knowledge generation through memory integration. NeuroImage, 244, 118600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118600
Wheeler, R. L., & Gabbert, F.(2017). Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830
Wilson, J. T., & Bauer, P. J.(2021). Prompt-facilitated learning: The development of unprompted memory integration and subsequent self-derivation. Memory & Cognition, 49(7), 1488-1489.
Zhu, J. D., Seymour, R. A., Szakay, A., & Sowman, P. F.(2020). Neuro-dynamics of executive control in bilingual language switching: An MEG study. Cognition, 199, 104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104247
李美华, 白学军, 闫国利. (2007). 执行功能水平高与低的大学生心理旋转眼动实验. 心理学探新, 03, 55-60.
李馨, 李海潮, 刘璟尧, 白学军. (2017). 阅读水平和阅读任务对英语词频效应的影响:来自非熟练汉-英双语者的眼动证据. 心理与行为研究, 15(04), 455-461.
马恒芬, 王培培, 翁旭初. (2010). 双语Stroop效应的性别差异研究. 应用心理学, 16(1), 61-66.
王敬欣, 李莎, 郝立莎, 张雪, 张阔. (2019). 空格减少汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉拥挤效应:来自眼动的证据. 心理科学, 42(04), 834-840.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[2]	周海淳, 陈英和, 戚玥, 陈悦, 杜星雨, 于玲珺, 于晓. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的类比能力缺陷: 执行功能还是类比策略？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 1-11.
[3]	郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[4]	相硕琪, 李亚丹, 叶超群, 杨伟星, 郭习佩, 张玲玲, 胡卫平. 创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系: 认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 32-41.
[5]	史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.
[6]	贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[7]	李娇娇, 徐碧波, 袁海龙, 尹锡杨. 社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.
[8]	牛骅, 王美芳. 父母体罚与儿童执行功能的关系:一项3年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 479-487.
[9]	苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫. 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标:个人中心分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 572-588.
[10]	胡志琴, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络欺凌的关系：道德推脱的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 346-356.
[11]	王蕾, 邴倩, 赵景欣. 亲子分离背景下的亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 403-411.
[12]	薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧. 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 421-430.
[13]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[14]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[15]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.