心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 32-41.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.01.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    

创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系: 认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用

相硕琪1, 李亚丹1, 叶超群1, 杨伟星2, 郭习佩1, 张玲玲1, 胡卫平1,3   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学现代教学技术教育部重点实验室, 西安 710062;
    2. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250000;
    3. 北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心陕西师范大学分中心, 西安 710062
  • 发布日期:2025-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 胡卫平 E-mail:weipinghu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2021TS093;GK202205022);国家自然科学基金项目(32171065);陕西师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“学习科学交叉学科建设”(GK202007004);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(22XJC190001);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划一般项目(2022JQ-156)。

The Relationship between Creativity Anxiety and Real-life Creativity: Chain Mediating Effects of Cognitive Flexibility and Creative Process Engagement

XIANG Shuoqi1, LI Yadan1, YE Chaoqun1, YANG Weixing2, GUO Xipei1, ZHANG Lingling1, HU Weiping1,3   

  1. 1. MOE Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi' an 710062;
    2. Department of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250000;
    3. Shaanxi Normal University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal University, Xi'an 710062
  • Published:2025-01-22

摘要: 基于注意控制理论和创造性过程理论, 本研究探索了创造焦虑和日常创造力(创造活动; 创造成就)的关系, 并考察了认知灵活性(可选择性; 可控性)和创造性参与过程(问题识别; 信息搜索与编码; 观点产生)在创造焦虑和日常创造力之间的链式中介作用。本研究以方便取样法调查了410名被试, 通过AMOS软件进行路径分析, 结果表明: 首先, 创造焦虑既与创造活动负相关, 也与创造成就负相关; 其次, 在创造焦虑和创造活动之间, 三条链式中介路径显著: 可选择性与问题识别, 可选择性与观点产生, 可控性与问题识别; 最后, 在创造焦虑和创造成就之间, 另三条链式中介路径显著: 可选择性与信息搜索和编码, 可选择性与观点产生, 可控性与信息搜索和编码。本研究有助于揭示创造焦虑影响创造活动和成就的融合与分离机制, 为探索降低创造焦虑负性影响的手段提供了启示。

关键词: 创造焦虑, 认知灵活性, 创造性参与过程, 日常创造力, 大学生

Abstract: Based on the Attentional Control Theory (ACT) and the Creative Process Theory (CPT), this study explored the relationship between creativity anxiety and real-life creativity (creative activities, CAct; creative achievements, CAch) and examined the potential chain mediating roles of cognitive flexibility (alternatives, AS; control, CS) and creative process engagement (problem identification, PI; information searching and encoding, ISE; idea generation, IG) between them. Four hundred and ten college students (M = 20.320, SD = 0.694) were recruited randomly. The results were as follows: (1) Creativity anxiety negatively predicted both creative activity (CAct) and creative achievement (CAch); (2) Creativity anxiety associates with creative activity (CAct) through the chain mediating effect of three paths (CA→AS→PI→CAct; CA→AS→IG→CAct; CA→CS→PI→CAct); (3) Creativity anxiety associates with creative achievement (CAch) through the chain mediating effect of another three paths (CA→AS→ISE→CAch; CA→AS→IG→CAch; CA→CS→ISE→CAch). This study is beneficial to understanding the underlying mechanism between creativity anxiety and real-life creativity and expanding the application scope of ACT and CPT. More importantly, these findings for intervening adverse effects of creativity anxiety on creative performance provide an adequate basis.

Key words: creativity anxiety, cognitive flexibility, creative process engagement, real-life creativity, undergraduate

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don’t.Biological Psychology, 92(3), 440-446.
Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled.Structural Equation Modeling, 11(2), 272-300.
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship of state and trait anxiety to performance on figural and verbal creative tasks.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 269-283.
Chrysikou, E. G. (2019). Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control.Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 94-99.
Daker, R. J., Cortes, R. A., Lyons, I. M., & Green, A. E. (2020). Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(1), 42-57.
Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 241-253.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions.Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA).Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 304-316.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory.Emotion, 7(2), 336-353.
Guilford, J. P. (1962). Potentiality for creativity.Gifted Children Quarterly, 6, 87-90.
Henker, N., Sonnentag, S., & Unger, D. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity: The mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement.Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 235-247.
Hu, W., Philip, A., Shen, J., & Lin, C. (2004). The comparisons of the development of scientific creativity between English and Chinese adolescents.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(06), 718-731.
Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility.New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190-200.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
Kleinmintz, O. M., Ivancovsky, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2019). The two-fold model of creativity: The neural underpinnings of the generation and evaluation of creative ideas.Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 131-138.
Lin, W. L., Tsai, P. H., Lin, H. Y., & Chen, H. C. (2014). How does emotion influencedifferent creative performances? The mediating role of cognitive flexibility. Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 834-844.
Paek, S. H., Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2016). A meta-analysis of the relationship between three common psychopathologies—ADHD, anxiety, and depression—and indicators of little-c creativity.Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 117-133.
Penagos-Corzo, J. C., & Saucedo, A. (2021). Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Creative Potential Traits.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756079
Perach, R., & Wisman, A. (2019). Can creativity beat death? A review and evidence on the existential anxiety buffering functions of creative achievement.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 193-210.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective.The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55-77.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O'Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing.Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 9-23.
Ren, Z., Daker, R. J., Shi, L., Sun, J., Beaty, R. E., Wu, X., … Qiu, J. (2021). Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Creativity Anxiety.NeuroImage, 225, 117469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117469
Sloutsky, V. M., & Fischer, A. V. (2008). Attentional learning and flexible induction: How mundane mechanisms give rise to smart behaviors.Child Development, 79, 639-651.
Tan, C. S., Lau, X. S., & Lee, L. K. (2019). The mediating role of creative process engagement in the relationship between shyness and self-rated creativity.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 222-231.
Wu, Y., Ma, S., He, X., Xiang, S., & Qi, S. (2021). Trait anxiety modulates the temporal dynamics of Stroop task switching: An ERP study.Biological Psychology, 163, 108144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108144
Yang, Y., Wu, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Jiang, K., & Li, Y. (2021). The Influence of L2 Proficiency on Bilinguals' Creativity: The Key Role of Adaptive Emotion Regulation Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 695014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695014
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 136-143.
Zabelina, D., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2016). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking.Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 488-498.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation,and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
贾绪计, 林崇德. (2014). 创造力研究: 心理学领域的四种取向. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (1), 61-67.
胡卫平, 周蓓. (2010). 动机对高一学生创造性的科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 31-36.
[1] 郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[2] 史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.
[3] 贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[4] 李娇娇, 徐碧波, 袁海龙, 尹锡杨. 社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.
[5] 苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫. 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标:个人中心分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 572-588.
[6] 胡志琴, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络欺凌的关系:道德推脱的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 346-356.
[7] 王蕾, 邴倩, 赵景欣. 亲子分离背景下的亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 403-411.
[8] 薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧. 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 421-430.
[9] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[10] 樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系:外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[11] 张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响:无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[12] 何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[13] 杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[14] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[15] 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!