父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.06.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于创造性行为的互动主义模型和一般压力理论,考察父母消极教养方式与恶意创造性行为的关系,并检验道德推脱的中介作用和性别的调节作用。采用整群取样法抽取长沙市三所高校的926名在校大学生进行问卷调查,结果表明:(1)父母消极教养方式能够显著正向预测恶意创造性行为;(2)道德推脱在父母消极教养方式和恶意创造性行为的关系中起中介作用;(3)“父母消极教养方式→道德推脱→恶意创造性行为”这一中介效应的前半路径受到性别的调节。具体而言,相较于女生,父母消极教养方式对男生道德推脱水平的正向预测作用更大。

关键词: 大学生, 父母消极教养方式, 道德推脱, 恶意创造性行为

Abstract: Based on interactionist model of creative behavior and general strain theory, the study aims to examine the relationship between negative parenting style and malevolent creativity behaviors, and the mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of gender. A total of 926 college students in three universities in Changsha City were recruited by cluster sampling method, the short form of EMBU, the adolescent moral disengagement scale and the malevolent creativity behavior scale. The results showed that: (1) Negative parenting style positively predicted the malevolent creative behaviors; (2) Moral disengagement mediated the relationship between negative parenting style and malevolent creative behaviors; (3) Gender played a moderating role in the first half of the mediating path of “negative parenting style→moral disengagement→malevolent creativity behaviors”, and the positive correlation between negative parenting style and moral disengagement was stronger in men than in women.

Key words: college students, negative parenting style, moral disengagement, malevolent creativity behaviors

中图分类号:

B844

史滋福, 周志豪, 许磊, 陈火红, 管锦亮, 刘承珍. 父母消极教养方式与大学生恶意创造性行为的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.

SHI Zifu, ZHOU Zhihao, XU Lei, CHEN Huohong, GUAN Jinliang, LIU Chengzhen. The Relationship between Negative Parenting Style and College Students’ Malevolent Creativity Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.

参考文献

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general stain theory of crime and delinquency.Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.
Al-Mahdawi, A. M., Dutton, E., Osman, H. A. M., Bakhiet, S. F., Mohammad, N. A., Khair, S., & Madison, G. (2022). Sex differences in malevolent creativity among Sudanese students.Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111724
Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., … van der Ende, J. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613-628.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 143-151.
Benedetto, L., & Ingrassia, M. (2021). Digital parenting: Raising and protecting children in media world.In L. Benedetto & M. Ingrassia (Eds.), Parenting: Empirical Advances and Intervention Resources (online). IntechOpen.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime.Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105-115.
De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). The emotive roots of creativity: Basic and applied issues on affect and motivation. In M. D. Mumford(Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 217-240). New York: Academic Press.
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making:A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374-391.
Felson, R. B. (1978). Aggression as impression management.Social Psychology, 45, 205-213.
Foster, M. D., Matheson, K., & Poole, M. (1994). Responding to sexual discrimination: The effects of societal versus self-blame.The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(6), 743-754.
Garbarino, J. (2008). Children and families in communities: Theory, Research, Policy and Practice.Children & Society, 49(6), 686-687.
Gamman, L., & Raein, M. (2010). Reviewing the art of crime: What, if anything, do criminals and artists/designers have in common. In D. Cropley, A. Cropley, J. Kaufman, & M. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 155-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional processanalysis: A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3(8), 335-337.
Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54-64.
Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682
Hyde, L. W.,Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197-209.
Ibrahim, D. M., Rohner, R. P.,Smith, R. L., & Flannery, K. M. (2015). Adults’ remembrances of parental acceptance-rejection in childhood predict current rejection sensitivity in adulthood. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 44(1), 51-62.
Jia, X., Wang, Q., & Lin, L. (2020). The relationship between childhood neglect and malevolent creativity: The mediating effect of the dark triad personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 613659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695
Kashani, J. H., & Shepperd, J. A. (1990). Aggression in adolescents: The role of social support and personality. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 35(4), 311-315.
Kawabata, Y., Alink, L. R., Tseng, W.-L., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Crick, N. R. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: A conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 31(4), 240-278.
Lawrence, E., Yoon, J., Langer, A., & Ro, E. (2009). Is psychological aggression as detrimental as physical aggression? The independent effects of psychological aggression on depression and anxiety symptoms. Violence and Victims, 24(1), 20-35.
Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Cui, Y., Zhou, W., & Li, S. (2018). Parenting style and aggression: A meta-analysis of mainland Chinese children and youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 446-455.
Longmore, R. J., & Worrell, M. (2007). Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavior therapy? Clinical Psychology Review, 27(2), 173-187.
McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6(2), 137-144.
Panetta, S. M., Somers, C. L., Ceresnie, A. R., Hillman, S. B., & Partridge, R. T. (2014). Maternal and paternalparenting style patterns and adolescent emotional and behavioral outcomes. Marriage & Family Review, 50(4), 342-359.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impacton aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288-1309.
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2020). Motivational factors in the typical display of humor and creative potential: The case of malevolent creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01213
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2021). Failure to reappraise: Malevolent creativity is linked to revenge ideation and impaired reappraisal inventiveness in the face of stressful, anger-eliciting events. Anxiety, Stress, Coping, 34(4), 437-449.
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Rominger, C., Papousek, I., & Fink, A. (2022). Antisocial schizotypy is linked to malevolent creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34(3), 355-367.
Robinson, J. L. (1994). Patterns of development in early empathic behavior: Environmental and child constitutional influences.Social Development, 3(2), 125-146.
Rubio-Garay, F., Carrasco, M. A., & Amor, P. J. (2016). Aggression, anger and hostility: Evaluation of moral disengagement as a mediational process.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 129-135.
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J.,Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117-141.
Shi, Y., Yuan, T., Bell, R., & Wang, J. (2020). Investigating the relationship between creativity and entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of creativity in the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01209
Teng, Z., Bear, G. G., Yang, C., Nie, Q., & Guo, C. (2020). Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: A longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychology, 35(1), 99-109.
Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 279-290.
Xu, X., Zhao, J., Xia, M., & Pang, W. (2021). I can, but I won't: Authentic people generate more malevolently creative ideas, but are less likely to implement them in daily life.Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110431
Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Teng, Z., & Guo, C. (2021). Parenting style and cyber-aggression in chinese youth:The role of moral disengagement and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 621878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621878
Zheng, X., Qin, X., Liu, X., & Liao, H. (2019). Will creative employees always make trouble? Investigating the roles of moral identity and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 653-672.
艾攀, 戴艳. (2022). 心理学视角下的道德损伤. 心理科学进展, 30(1), 168-178.
安连超, 张守臣, 王宏, 马子媛, 赵建芳. (2018). 共情对大学生亲社会行为的影响: 道德推脱和内疚的多重中介作用. 心理学探新, 38(04), 350-355.
陈玉焕, 赵倩. (2012). 父母教养方式与大学生攻击性的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(04), 595-597.
程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. (2021a). 愤怒情绪对不同类型恶意创造力表现的影响. 心理科学, 44(6), 1336-1345.
程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. (2021b). 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略. 心理学报, 53(8), 847-860.
贡喆, 刘昌. (2016). 恶意创造力: 概念、测量方法、影响因素以及研究展望. 心理科学, 39(01), 63-68.
贡喆, 彭杨, 王贤, 刘昌. (2017). 高恶意创造力者的注意偏向和冲动控制特征. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(4), 613-617.
马罕. (2015). 高中生父母教养方式与心理健康相关分析. 中国健康心理学杂志, 23(12), 1878-1881.
黄紫薇, 李雅超, 常扩, 张辉. (2020). 大学生心理健康与父母教养方式的关系: 心理资本的中介效应. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(05), 737-742.
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
刘国雄, 陆婷. (2013). 青少年的道德推脱及其与家庭教养方式的关系. 中国特殊教育, 32(04), 78-84.
吴鹏, 马桑妮, 方紫琼, 徐碧波, 刘华山.(2016). 父母教养方式的潜在类别: 潜在剖面分析. 心理与行为研究, 14(04), 523-530.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(05), 714-726.
王彬鈺, 贡喆.(2021).攻击性与恶意创造力的关系: 链式中介效应分析. 心理研究, 14(06), 558-564.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2010). 道德推脱的概念, 测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
中国共产党新闻网. (2022). 坚持守正创新(思想纵横). http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2022/1121/c40531-32570809.html
张翔. (2022). 父母教养方式对恶意创造力的影响: 公正世界信念和道德推脱的链式中介效应 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
张天阳, 吴相雷, 杨冉, 徐青松, 蔡莉英, 王政. (2019). 大学新生共情能力与父母教养方式的关系. 中国学校卫生, 40(04), 601-605.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(06), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[2]	李娇娇, 徐碧波, 袁海龙, 尹锡杨. 社会排斥与大学生恶意创造力的关系: 应对方式和攻击性的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 667-674.
[3]	苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫. 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标:个人中心分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 572-588.
[4]	胡志琴, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络欺凌的关系：道德推脱的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 346-356.
[5]	王蕾, 邴倩, 赵景欣. 亲子分离背景下的亲子亲合、交感神经系统活动与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 403-411.
[6]	薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧. 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 421-430.
[7]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[8]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[9]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[10]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[11]	鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
[12]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[13]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[14]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[15]	张林, 陈燕铃, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 范航, 刘燊. 冷酷无情特质与初中生校园欺凌行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 266-275.