心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 323-332.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响

赵纤1,2, 王志航2, 王东方3, 袁言云2, 尹霞云1, 黎志华1   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学教育学院, 湘潭 411201;
    2. 湖南农业大学教育学院, 长沙 410128;
    3. 华南师范大学心理学院/华南师范大学心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631
  • 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 黎志华 E-mail:lzhua1018@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(16BSH093)。

Developmental Trajectory of Prosocial Behavior in Impoverished Children during Early Adolescence: The Effects of Gender and Parenting Style Heterogeneity

ZHAO Xian1,2, WANG Zhihang2, WANG Dongfang3, YUAN Yanyun2, YIN Xiayun1, LI Zhihua1   

  1. 1. Institute of Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201;
    2. College of Education, Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha 410128;
    3. School of Psychology and Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-13

摘要: 为了探究贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹以及父母教养方式的异质性及其性别效应,对815名贫困家庭儿童(M=11.75±1.55岁;男生351人)的父母教养方式进行评估,并对其亲社会行为进行了2年共4次的追踪调查,数据分别采用潜在剖面分析和多组潜变量增长模型进行分析。结果发现:(1)贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为水平在青少年早期呈显著的线性下降趋势;(2)贫困家庭父母教养方式的异质性对儿童亲社会行为的初始水平和发展轨迹均有显著的效应,积极关爱型贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为初始水平得分显著高于其它类型,但在发展轨迹上却呈线性下降的趋势;消极控制型贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为在初始水平上显著低于其它类型,其发展轨迹无显著变化;(3)在性别效应上,适度关爱型组别中女生亲社会行为的初始水平显著的高于男生,且该组女生的亲社会行为下降速度比男生缓慢。结论:贫困家庭父母教养方式的异质性对青少年早期儿童亲社会行为发展轨迹存在显著效应,适度关爱型父母教养方式可以缓冲贫困家庭中女孩亲社会行为的下降速度。

关键词: 贫困家庭儿童, 亲社会行为, 发展轨迹, 父母教养方式, 性别差异

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the developmental trajectory of Chinese impoverished children’s prosocial behaviors during early adolescence. Latent Profile Model and Multi-group Latent Growth Model was conducted to examine the development trajectory of prosocial behavior and to explore gender differences and predictive effects of parenting style heterogeneity on the developmental trajectory. A sample of 815 Chinese impoverished children (Meanage = 11.75 ±1.55 years old) were investigated four times in two years. Due to sample attrition, 763 Chinese impoverished children (Meanage = 13.88 ±1.52 years old) were investigated in the last survey. Results showed that: (1) Impoverished children’s prosocial behavior decreased linearly during the early of adolescence; (2) The heterogeneity of parenting style in poor families had significant effects on the initial level and developmental trajectory of children's prosocial behaviors, with the initial score of impoverished children’s prosocial behavior from positive caring groups significantly higher than other groups, but the developmental trajectory showed a linear decline; however, the prosocial behaviors of the children from the negative control groups were significantly lower than other groups at the initial level, but the developmental trajectory did not change significantly; (3) In terms of gender effect, the initial level of prosocial behavior of girls in the moderate caring groups were significantly higher than boys, and the decline rate of prosocial behavior of girls in this groups were slower than boys. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of parenting style had a significant effect on the developmental trajectory of prosocial behaviors of early adolescent impoverish children. Moderate caring parenting styles can relieve the decline rate of prosocial behaviors of female impoverished children.

Key words: impoverished children, prosocial behavior, development trajectory, parenting style, gender difference

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bellamy, C. (2005). The state of the world's children, 2005:Childhood under threat.Future Survey, 60(100), 71-73.
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301-324.
Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Mcginley, M., & Hayes, R. (2011). The roles of parental inductions, moral emotions, and moral cognitions in prosocial tendencies among mexican american and european american early adolescents.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(6), 757-781.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255.
Chung, H., & Gale, J. (2009). Family functioning and self-differentiation:A cross-cultural examination. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 19-33.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomiccontext of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 175-199.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context:An integrative model.Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining.Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643-666.
Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent):Social classes in the stereotype content model.Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138-157.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior:An examination of the social psychology of gender.American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658.
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235-260.
Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping.Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 43-48.
Flook, L., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). Developmental differences in prosocial behavior between preschool and late elementary school.Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 876.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00876
Franken, A., Moffitt, T. E., Steglich, C. E., Dijkstra, J. K., Harakeh, Z., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2016). The role of self-control and early adolescents' friendships in the development of externalizing behavior:The SNARE study.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1800-1811.
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire:A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version.European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 7(3), 125-130.
Graaff, J. V. D., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2017). Prosocial behavior in adolescence:Gender differences in development and links with empathy.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1086-1099.
Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2018). Does low (vs. high) subjective socioeconomic status increase both prosociality and aggression?Social Psychology, 49(2), 76-87.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources:A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
Jeong, J., Pitchik, H. O., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2018). Stimulation interventions and parenting in low-and middle-income countries:A meta-analysis.Pediatrics, 141(4), e20173510.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3510
Jones, D. J., Loiselle, R., & Highlander, A. (2018). Parent-adolescent socialization of social class in low-income White families:Theory, research, and future directions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), 622-636.
Kornd rfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015) A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior.PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133193
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism:How the rich are different from the poor.Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
Lichter, D. T., Shanahan, M. J., & Gardner, E. L. (2002). Helping others? The effects of childhood poverty and family instability on prosocial behavior.Youth & Society, 34(1), 89-119.
Little, T. D. (1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data:Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53-76.
Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development:A review of the Family Stress Model.Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(2), 85-90.
Ngai, S. S. Y., Xie, L., Ng, Y. H., & Ngai, H. L. (2018). The effects of parenting behavior on prosocial behavior of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 154-162.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling:A Monte Carlo simulation study.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., Christensen, K. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012). Bidirectional relations between authoritative parenting and adolescents' prosocial behaviors.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 400-408.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior.Child Development, 86(6), 1759-1772.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Collier, K. M. (2016). Longitudinal relations between parental media monitoring and adolescent aggression, prosocial behavior, and externalizing problems.Journal of Adolescence, 46, 86-97.
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). Parental bonding instrument (PBI).British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52(1), 1-10.
Pastorelli, C., Lansford, J. E., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Malone, P. S., Di Giunta, L., Bacchini, D., … Tapanya, S. (2016). Positive parenting and children's prosocial behavior in eight countries.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(7), 824-834.
Patterson, J. M. (2010). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory.Journal of Marriage & Family, 64(2), 349-360.
Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives.Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392.
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation:Causes and consequences.Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 40, 1-72.
Petersen, M. B., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Birth weight and social trust in adulthood:Evidence for early calibration of social cognition.Psychological Science, 26(11), 1681-1692.
Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents:An updated meta-analysis.Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873-932.
Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., … Skinner, A. T. (2018). Parental acceptance-rejection and child prosocial behavior:Developmental transactions across the transition to adolescence in nine countries, mothers and fathers, and girls and boys.Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1881-1890.
Raver, C. C., Roy, A. L., Pressler, E., Ursache, A. M., & Charles McCoy, D. (2017). Poverty-related adversity and emotion regulation predict internalizing behavior problems among low-income children ages 8-11.Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 2.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010002
Sohrabi, R., Asadi, M., Habibollahzade, H., & PanaAli, A. (2013). Relationship between self-differentiation in bowen's family therapy and psychological health.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1773-1775.
Stellar, J. E., Manzo, V. M., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class and compassion:Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering.Emotion, 12(3), 449-459.
Tan, T. X., Camras, L. A., Deng, H., Zhang, M., & Lu, Z. (2012). Family stress, parenting styles, and behavioral adjustment in preschool-age adopted Chinese girls.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 128-136.
Vollhardt, J. R. & Staub, E. (2011). Inclusive altruism born of suffering:The relationship between adversity and prosocial attitudes and behavior toward disadvantaged outgroups.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(3), 307-315.
Weinberger, N., & Stein, K. (2008). Early competitive game playing in same-and mixed-gender peer groups.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(4), 499-514.
杜亚松, 寇建华, 王秀玲, 夏黎明, 邹如皓. (2006). 长处和困难问卷研究. 心理科学, 29(6), 1419-1421.
管健. (2016). 低社会阶层的社会心理与行为倾向——基于积极和消极视角. 南京师大学报:社会科学版, (6), 136-144.
侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. (2018). 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(4), 417-425.
湖南省扶贫开发办公室. (2019). 湖南省建档立卡贫困户识别标准及程序. 2019-4-15 取自http://hnsfpb.hunan.gov.cn/xxgk_71121/zcfg/gfxwj/201904/t20190415_5315612.html
蒋奖, 许燕, 蒋苾菁, 于生凯, 郑芳芳. (2009). 父母教养方式问卷 (PBI) 的信效度研究. 心理科学, 32(1), 193-196.
宋亚萍, 张克云. (2014). 儿童贫困界定和测度研究综述. 北京青年政治学院学报, 23(2), 71-78.
王文超, 伍新春. (2020). 共情对灾后青少年亲社会行为的影响:感恩, 社会支持和创伤后成长的中介作用. 心理学报, 52(3), 307-316.
魏星, 吕娜, 纪林芹, 陈亮, 张文新. (2015). 童年晚期亲社会行为与儿童的心理社会适应. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 402-410.
杨红君, 楚艳民, 刘利, 刘琴, 陈哲, 刘文莉, 钟爱良. (2009). 父母养育方式量表(PBI)在中国大学生中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 434-436.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3] 章洁敏, 陶云, 杨舒涵, 陈睿. 亲社会行为的概念表征及其方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 298-304.
[4] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[7] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[8] 李强强, 胡佳. 时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.
[9] 李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[10] 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.
[11] 高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[12] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[13] 王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330.
[14] 林琳, 邱少劼, 刘羽, 杨洋, 杨亚楠, 贾绪计, 徐战胜, 白学军. 青少年早期冲动性的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 339-347.
[15] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!