心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 323-332.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响

赵纤1,2, 王志航2, 王东方3, 袁言云2, 尹霞云1, 黎志华1   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学教育学院, 湘潭 411201;
    2. 湖南农业大学教育学院, 长沙 410128;
    3. 华南师范大学心理学院/华南师范大学心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631
  • 发布日期:2023-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 黎志华 E-mail:lzhua1018@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(16BSH093)。

Developmental Trajectory of Prosocial Behavior in Impoverished Children during Early Adolescence: The Effects of Gender and Parenting Style Heterogeneity

ZHAO Xian1,2, WANG Zhihang2, WANG Dongfang3, YUAN Yanyun2, YIN Xiayun1, LI Zhihua1   

  1. 1. Institute of Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201;
    2. College of Education, Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha 410128;
    3. School of Psychology and Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Published:2023-05-13

摘要: 为了探究贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹以及父母教养方式的异质性及其性别效应,对815名贫困家庭儿童(M=11.75±1.55岁;男生351人)的父母教养方式进行评估,并对其亲社会行为进行了2年共4次的追踪调查,数据分别采用潜在剖面分析和多组潜变量增长模型进行分析。结果发现:(1)贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为水平在青少年早期呈显著的线性下降趋势;(2)贫困家庭父母教养方式的异质性对儿童亲社会行为的初始水平和发展轨迹均有显著的效应,积极关爱型贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为初始水平得分显著高于其它类型,但在发展轨迹上却呈线性下降的趋势;消极控制型贫困家庭儿童的亲社会行为在初始水平上显著低于其它类型,其发展轨迹无显著变化;(3)在性别效应上,适度关爱型组别中女生亲社会行为的初始水平显著的高于男生,且该组女生的亲社会行为下降速度比男生缓慢。结论:贫困家庭父母教养方式的异质性对青少年早期儿童亲社会行为发展轨迹存在显著效应,适度关爱型父母教养方式可以缓冲贫困家庭中女孩亲社会行为的下降速度。

关键词: 贫困家庭儿童, 亲社会行为, 发展轨迹, 父母教养方式, 性别差异

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the developmental trajectory of Chinese impoverished children’s prosocial behaviors during early adolescence. Latent Profile Model and Multi-group Latent Growth Model was conducted to examine the development trajectory of prosocial behavior and to explore gender differences and predictive effects of parenting style heterogeneity on the developmental trajectory. A sample of 815 Chinese impoverished children (Meanage = 11.75 ±1.55 years old) were investigated four times in two years. Due to sample attrition, 763 Chinese impoverished children (Meanage = 13.88 ±1.52 years old) were investigated in the last survey. Results showed that: (1) Impoverished children’s prosocial behavior decreased linearly during the early of adolescence; (2) The heterogeneity of parenting style in poor families had significant effects on the initial level and developmental trajectory of children's prosocial behaviors, with the initial score of impoverished children’s prosocial behavior from positive caring groups significantly higher than other groups, but the developmental trajectory showed a linear decline; however, the prosocial behaviors of the children from the negative control groups were significantly lower than other groups at the initial level, but the developmental trajectory did not change significantly; (3) In terms of gender effect, the initial level of prosocial behavior of girls in the moderate caring groups were significantly higher than boys, and the decline rate of prosocial behavior of girls in this groups were slower than boys. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of parenting style had a significant effect on the developmental trajectory of prosocial behaviors of early adolescent impoverish children. Moderate caring parenting styles can relieve the decline rate of prosocial behaviors of female impoverished children.

Key words: impoverished children, prosocial behavior, development trajectory, parenting style, gender difference

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bellamy, C. (2005). The state of the world's children, 2005:Childhood under threat.Future Survey, 60(100), 71-73.
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301-324.
Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Mcginley, M., & Hayes, R. (2011). The roles of parental inductions, moral emotions, and moral cognitions in prosocial tendencies among mexican american and european american early adolescents.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(6), 757-781.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255.
Chung, H., & Gale, J. (2009). Family functioning and self-differentiation:A cross-cultural examination. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 19-33.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomiccontext of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 175-199.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context:An integrative model.Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining.Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643-666.
Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent):Social classes in the stereotype content model.Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138-157.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior:An examination of the social psychology of gender.American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658.
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235-260.
Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping.Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 43-48.
Flook, L., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). Developmental differences in prosocial behavior between preschool and late elementary school.Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 876.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00876
Franken, A., Moffitt, T. E., Steglich, C. E., Dijkstra, J. K., Harakeh, Z., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2016). The role of self-control and early adolescents' friendships in the development of externalizing behavior:The SNARE study.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1800-1811.
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire:A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version.European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 7(3), 125-130.
Graaff, J. V. D., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2017). Prosocial behavior in adolescence:Gender differences in development and links with empathy.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1086-1099.
Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2018). Does low (vs. high) subjective socioeconomic status increase both prosociality and aggression?Social Psychology, 49(2), 76-87.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources:A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
Jeong, J., Pitchik, H. O., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2018). Stimulation interventions and parenting in low-and middle-income countries:A meta-analysis.Pediatrics, 141(4), e20173510.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3510
Jones, D. J., Loiselle, R., & Highlander, A. (2018). Parent-adolescent socialization of social class in low-income White families:Theory, research, and future directions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), 622-636.
Kornd rfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015) A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior.PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133193
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism:How the rich are different from the poor.Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
Lichter, D. T., Shanahan, M. J., & Gardner, E. L. (2002). Helping others? The effects of childhood poverty and family instability on prosocial behavior.Youth & Society, 34(1), 89-119.
Little, T. D. (1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data:Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53-76.
Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development:A review of the Family Stress Model.Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(2), 85-90.
Ngai, S. S. Y., Xie, L., Ng, Y. H., & Ngai, H. L. (2018). The effects of parenting behavior on prosocial behavior of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 154-162.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling:A Monte Carlo simulation study.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., Christensen, K. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012). Bidirectional relations between authoritative parenting and adolescents' prosocial behaviors.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 400-408.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior.Child Development, 86(6), 1759-1772.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Collier, K. M. (2016). Longitudinal relations between parental media monitoring and adolescent aggression, prosocial behavior, and externalizing problems.Journal of Adolescence, 46, 86-97.
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). Parental bonding instrument (PBI).British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52(1), 1-10.
Pastorelli, C., Lansford, J. E., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Malone, P. S., Di Giunta, L., Bacchini, D., … Tapanya, S. (2016). Positive parenting and children's prosocial behavior in eight countries.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(7), 824-834.
Patterson, J. M. (2010). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory.Journal of Marriage & Family, 64(2), 349-360.
Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives.Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392.
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation:Causes and consequences.Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 40, 1-72.
Petersen, M. B., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Birth weight and social trust in adulthood:Evidence for early calibration of social cognition.Psychological Science, 26(11), 1681-1692.
Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents:An updated meta-analysis.Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873-932.
Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., … Skinner, A. T. (2018). Parental acceptance-rejection and child prosocial behavior:Developmental transactions across the transition to adolescence in nine countries, mothers and fathers, and girls and boys.Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1881-1890.
Raver, C. C., Roy, A. L., Pressler, E., Ursache, A. M., & Charles McCoy, D. (2017). Poverty-related adversity and emotion regulation predict internalizing behavior problems among low-income children ages 8-11.Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 2.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010002
Sohrabi, R., Asadi, M., Habibollahzade, H., & PanaAli, A. (2013). Relationship between self-differentiation in bowen's family therapy and psychological health.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1773-1775.
Stellar, J. E., Manzo, V. M., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class and compassion:Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering.Emotion, 12(3), 449-459.
Tan, T. X., Camras, L. A., Deng, H., Zhang, M., & Lu, Z. (2012). Family stress, parenting styles, and behavioral adjustment in preschool-age adopted Chinese girls.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 128-136.
Vollhardt, J. R. & Staub, E. (2011). Inclusive altruism born of suffering:The relationship between adversity and prosocial attitudes and behavior toward disadvantaged outgroups.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(3), 307-315.
Weinberger, N., & Stein, K. (2008). Early competitive game playing in same-and mixed-gender peer groups.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(4), 499-514.
杜亚松, 寇建华, 王秀玲, 夏黎明, 邹如皓. (2006). 长处和困难问卷研究. 心理科学, 29(6), 1419-1421.
管健. (2016). 低社会阶层的社会心理与行为倾向——基于积极和消极视角. 南京师大学报:社会科学版, (6), 136-144.
侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. (2018). 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(4), 417-425.
湖南省扶贫开发办公室. (2019). 湖南省建档立卡贫困户识别标准及程序. 2019-4-15 取自http://hnsfpb.hunan.gov.cn/xxgk_71121/zcfg/gfxwj/201904/t20190415_5315612.html
蒋奖, 许燕, 蒋苾菁, 于生凯, 郑芳芳. (2009). 父母教养方式问卷 (PBI) 的信效度研究. 心理科学, 32(1), 193-196.
宋亚萍, 张克云. (2014). 儿童贫困界定和测度研究综述. 北京青年政治学院学报, 23(2), 71-78.
王文超, 伍新春. (2020). 共情对灾后青少年亲社会行为的影响:感恩, 社会支持和创伤后成长的中介作用. 心理学报, 52(3), 307-316.
魏星, 吕娜, 纪林芹, 陈亮, 张文新. (2015). 童年晚期亲社会行为与儿童的心理社会适应. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 402-410.
杨红君, 楚艳民, 刘利, 刘琴, 陈哲, 刘文莉, 钟爱良. (2009). 父母养育方式量表(PBI)在中国大学生中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 434-436.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[1] 王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] 毕爽, 朱华琳, 周晖. 每日父母教养焦虑与儿童亲社会行为的动态关系:正念教养的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 490-501.
[3] 李书琴, 向燕辉. 初中生宽恕的发展趋势与异质轨迹:大五人格的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 502-511.
[4] 甘严, 柏霁容, 罗明玥, 范奕敏, 刘苗苗, 闫梦格, 苏永强, 李虹. 小学新生朗读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对三年级阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 544-552.
[5] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[6] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[7] 何震, 詹林, 曾子豪, 胡义秋. 羞耻心对青少年主观幸福感的影响——亲社会行为和人际关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 172-181.
[8] 李蓓蕾, 林彤, 赖梅艳, 车猛, 邓林园. 初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系:基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.
[9] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[10] 李强强, 胡耿丹. 加工模式对亲社会行为的影响——社会价值取向和代价的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 791-798.
[11] 罗玉晗, 徐梓婧, 周晴, 杨政乾, 柯李, 王耘, 陈福美. COVID-19疫情压力对青少年生命史策略的影响及其行为表现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 398-409.
[12] 谭德琴, 丁菀, 宋省成, 吴伟, 蔺秀云. 代际间的暴力传递——父母虐待对儿童欺负行为的影响:基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 410-419.
[13] 游志麒, 郭宇顺, 张陆, 李晓军. 父母冲突与青少年亲社会行为的关系: 人际信任与共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 51-59.
[14] 丁倩, 宋紫薇, 李明蔚, 李晓彤, 周宗奎. 流言让人分心:校园负面八卦对中学生上课走神的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 824-831.
[15] 刘倩文, 高晗晶, 王振宏. 亲子关系与CLOCK基因rs1801260多态性对学前儿童亲社会行为的交互影响:性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 625-635.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!