实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.01.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用主动性人格量表、工作绩效量表、人际关系量表、教师职业认同量表对385名实习教师从其实习第一周起连续追踪测量五周,利用多层线性模型探讨实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹,以及主动性人格对教师职业认同的影响及其机制。结果表明:(1)实习初期教师职业认同呈先高后低再升高的U型非线性发展趋势;(2)工作绩效和人际关系在主动性人格与教师职业认同之间起部分中介作用,且工作绩效的中介效应显著大于人际关系的中介效应。研究结果不仅揭示了实习初期教师职业认同的动态发展轨迹,同时还揭示了主动性人格影响教师职业认同的中介机制,对提升教师培养质量具有重要的参考价值。

关键词: 职业认同, 主动性人格, 工作绩效, 人际关系, 发展轨迹, 实习教师

Abstract: A total of 385 student teachers were recruited to complete a survey measuring proactive personality, work performance, interpersonal relationship and professional identity over a period of five weeks from the first week of their educational practice, and hierarchical linear modelling was used to analyze the developmental trajectory of student teachers' professional identity in the early stages of teaching practice and the mediating mechanisms of work performance and interpersonal relationship in the relationship between proactive personality and student teachers' professional identity. The results show that:(1) professional identity shows a U-like developmental trajectory as it first decreases and then increases over time; and (2) work performance and interpersonal relationship partly mediate the relationship between proactive personality and professional identity in student teachers. However, the mediating effect of work performance is much stronger than that of interpersonal relationship. This study has demonstrated the dynamic developmental trajectory of student teachers' professional identity in the early stages of teaching practice and the mediating mechanisms of work performance and interpersonal relationship in the relationship between professional identity and proactive personality.

Key words: professional identity, proactive personality, work performance, interpersonal relationship, developmental trajectory, student teachers

中图分类号:

B844

黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.

HUANG Jie, ZHU Dan, YANG Ao. The Developmental Trajectory of Student Teachers' Professional Identity in the Early Stages of Teaching Practice and its Relationship with Proactive Personality: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.

参考文献

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior:A measure and correlates.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity:An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education.Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128.
Crant, J., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. F. (2017). Proactive personality:A twenty-year review.In P. Sharon & B. Uta (Eds.). Proactivity at work(pp.193-225). New York:Routledge.
Esther, T. C., & Michelle, H. L.(2011). Profiling teachers' sense of professional identity.Educational Studies, 5(37), 593-608.
Farh, J. L. L., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. S. (1991). Cultural relativity in action:A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and US workers.Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 129-147.
Filomena, R., & Maria, J. M. (2019). Student teachers' professional identity:A review of research contributions.Educational Research Review, 28, 100286.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100286
Fuller, J. B. & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature:A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329-345.
Green, Z. A., Noor, U., & Hashemi, M. N. (2019). Furthering proactivity and career adaptability among university students:Test of intervention.Journal of Career Assessment, 28(3), 402-424.
Izadinia, M. (2015). A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers' professional identity.Teaching & Teacher Education, 52, 1-10.
Mccormick, B. W., Guay, R. P., Colbert, A. E., & Stewart, G. L. (2019). Proactive personality and proactive behavior:Perspectives on person-situation interactions.Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 92, 30-51.
Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Moate, J. (2016). Who and how? Preservice teachers as active agents developing professional identities.Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 318-327.
Spitzmuller, M., Sin, H. P., Howe, M., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research:A meta-analytic review.Human Performance, 28(4), 351-379.
Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation:Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers' understanding of their work as teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455-465.
Ten Dam, G. T., & Blom, S. (2006). Learning through participation. The potential of school-based teacher education for developing a professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 647-660.
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction:insights from action research.Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 53-168.
方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. (2010). 基于阶层线性理论的多层级中介效应. 心理科学进展, 18(08), 1329-1338.
冯伯麟. (1996). 教师工作满意及其影响因素的研究. 教育研究, 2, 42-49+6.
胡芳芳, 桑青松. (2013). 幼儿教师职业认同、社会支持与工作满意度的关系. 心理与行为研究, 11(5), 666-670.
胡青, 王胜男, 张兴伟, 程斌, 孙宏伟. (2011). 工作中的主动性行为的回顾与展望. 心理科学进展, 19(10), 1534-1543.
李超平, 苏琴, 宋照礼. (2014). 互动视角的组织社会化动态跟踪研究. 心理科学进展, 22(03), 409-417.
李倩, 王传美. (2018). 我国中小学教师职业认同研究的元分析. 教育研究与实验, 4, 93-96.
刘密, 龙立荣, 祖伟. (2007). 主动性人格的研究现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 15(02), 333-337.
罗杰, 周瑗, 陈维, 潘运, 赵守盈. (2014). 教师职业认同与情感承诺的关系:工作满意度的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(03), 100-106.
商佳音, 甘怡群. (2009). 主动性人格对大学毕业生职业决策自我效能的影响. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 45(03), 548-554.
魏淑华, 宋广文, 张大均. (2013). 我国中小学教师职业认同的结构与量表. 教师教育研究, 25(1), 55-60+75.
魏淑华, 宋广文, 张大均. (2017). 不同职业认同水平教师对职业生活事件的社会认知加工特征. 心理发展与教育, 33(01), 45-55.
吴洁清, 董勇燕, 熊俊梅, 曹钰. (2016). 大学生主动性人格与生涯适应力的关系:成就动机的中介作用及其性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 32(05), 547-556.
谢淑海. (2016). 实习支教生教师专业身份建构过程的叙事研究(博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
严鸣, 涂红伟, 李骥. (2011). 认同理论视角下新员工组织社会化的定义及结构维度. 心理科学进展, 19(5), 624-632.
胥彦, 李超平. (2019). 追踪研究在组织行为学中的应用. 心理科学进展, 27(04), 600-610.
杨玲. (2014). 中小学教师职业认同的阶段发展论. 教师教育研究, 26(02), 56-64.
杨文圣, 牟家增, 李博文, 王佳颖. (2019). 主动性人格与员工行为的关系:政治技能视角下有中介的调节模型. 心理科学, 42(06), 1448-1454.
叶宝娟, 郑清, 董圣鸿, 刘林林, 方小婷, 曹灿兮. (2017). 胜任力对农村小学校长工作满意度的影响:领导效能与职业认同的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(03), 306-312.
张睆, 张晓辉, 胡卫平. (2018). 工作角色与社会身份:教师职业认同的双重内涵及其价值审视. 教师教育学报, 5(05), 22-30.
张燕红, 李永周, 周勇, 邹琼. (2018). 关系资源视角的新员工组织社会化过程机制. 心理科学进展, 26(04), 584-598.
张颖, 杨付. (2017). 主动性人格:机制与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 25(09), 1544-1551.
周寰, 衣新发, 胡卫平. (2014). 初为人师的困惑与解决——实习教师 "现实冲击" 的理论模型构建. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 32(2), 67-73.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(06), 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	陈启山, 何静怡. 女大学生室友的愤怒特质匹配与人际关系：有调节的多项式回归模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 55-63.
[3]	王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响：择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[6]	李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[7]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[8]	刘勤学, 张玲玲, 林悦, 丁子恩. 消极家庭表征与青少年网络人际关系成瘾：归属感需求和社交敏感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 546-555.
[9]	林琳, 邱少劼, 刘羽, 杨洋, 杨亚楠, 贾绪计, 徐战胜, 白学军. 青少年早期冲动性的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 339-347.
[10]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[11]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[12]	叶宝娟, 孙原, 高良, 夏扉, 杨强. 主动性人格与大学生职业成熟度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 304-310.
[13]	林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112.
[14]	程亚华, 周婷娜, 赵英, 李虹, 伍新春. 小学低年级儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 686-696.
[15]	赵冬梅, 王婷, 吴坤英, 李宗欣, 周欣彤. 大学生宿舍人际关系与抑郁的关系:宿舍冲突应对方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 597-604.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed