心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 348-357.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.03.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用

李蓓蕾1, 高婷2, 张莉莉1, 周楠1, 邓林园1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学教育学部, 北京 100875;
    2. 中国人民大学教育学院, 北京 100872
  • 发布日期:2022-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 邓林园 E-mail:09036@bnu.edu.cn

Relationship between Student’s Perceived Teacher Bullying Attitude and Student Bullying Behavior:Mediating Effect of Student Bullying Attitude and Moderating Effect of Gender

LI Beilei1, GAO Ting2, ZHANG Lili1, ZHOU Nan1, DENG Linyuan1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. School of Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Published:2022-05-17

摘要: 校园欺凌严重影响青少年身心的健康发展,教师是预防和干预校园欺凌的重要力量。本研究拟在考察学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为关系的基础上,探究学生欺凌态度的中介效应以及性别的调节作用。本研究采用《校园欺凌量表》、《学生欺凌态度量表》以及《学生感知的教师欺凌态度量表》对来自北京市两所初中的698名初一和初二学生进行测查。结果显示:(1)初中男生总体及不同类型的欺凌行为及其欺凌态度均显著高于女生,而女生所感知的教师欺凌严重性态度则显著高于男生;(2)学生感知的教师欺凌严重性态度显著负向预测学生欺凌行为;(3)学生欺凌态度在学生感知的教师欺凌态度和学生欺凌行为之间起部分中介作用;(4)学生欺凌态度的中介效应存在显著性别差异,男生欺凌态度为部分中介作用,而女生欺凌态度为完全中介作用。

关键词: 初中生, 学生欺凌行为, 教师欺凌态度, 学生欺凌态度, 性别差异

Abstract: School bullying has an extremely negative impact on student’s positive development and teacher is one of the most important elements to prevent and intervene school bullying. The present study sought to explore the relationship between student’s perceived teacher bullying attitude and student bullying behavior and the mediating effect of student bullying attitude between them, as well as the moderating effect of gender on this mediating effect. A total of 698 7th- and 8th- grade students from two public middle schools of Beijing were investigated with School Bullying Scale, Student’s Bullying Attitude Scale and Student’s Perceived Teacher Bullying Attitude Questionnaire. The results found that: (1) Male students showed more bullying behaviors in general and of different types than their female classmates and they also hold more positive attitude towards bullying, while the teacher seriousness attitude towards bullying perceived by female students was significantly higher than that perceived by male students; (2) Student’s perceived teacher seriousness attitude towards bullying significantly predicted student bullying behavior negatively; (3) The effect of student’s perceived teacher bullying attitude on student bullying behavior can be partially mediated by student bullying attitude; (4) There was an significant gender difference of this mediating effect of student bullying attitude. Specifically, males partially while females fully mediated the effect of teacher bullying attitude on student bullying behavior by their bullying attitude.

Key words: middle school students, student bullying behavior, teacher bullying attitude, student bullying attitude, gender difference

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aceves, M. J., Hinshaw, S. P., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Page-Gould, E. (2010).Seek help from teachers or fight back? Student perceptions of teachers' actions during conflicts and responses to peer victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(6), 658-669.
Agnew, R., & Brezina, T. (1997).Relational problems with peers, gender, and delinquency. Youth and Society, 29(1), 84-111.
Ajzen, I. (1991).The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Almquist, Y. B., Östberg, V., Rostila, M., Edling, C., & Rydgren, J. (2014).Friendship network characteristics and psychological well-being in late adolescence:Exploring differences by gender and gender composition. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(2), 146-154.
Archer, J. (2004).Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings:A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291-322.
Azeredo, C. M., Rinaldi, A. E. M., de Moraes, C. L., Levy, R. B., & Menezes, P. R. (2015). School bullying:A systematic review of contextual-level risk factors in observational studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 65-76.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004).The empathy quotient:An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.
Bear, G. G., Mantz, L. S., Glutting, J. J., Yang, C., & Boyer, D. E. (2015). Differences in bullying victimization between students with and without disabilities.School Psychology Review, 44(1), 98-116.
Bj rkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992).Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117-127.
Boulton, M. J., Bucci, E., & Hawker, D. D. S. (1999).Swedish and English secondary school pupils' attitudes towards, and conceptions of, bullying:Concurrent links with bully/victim involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 277-284.
Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., & Flemington, I. (2002).Associations between secondary school pupils' definitions of bullying, attitudes towards bullying, and tendencies to engage in bullying:Age and sex differences. Educational Studies, 28(4), 353-370.
Callaghan, S., & Joseph, S. (1995). Self-concept and peer victimization among schoolchildren.Personality and Individual Differences, 18(1), 161-163.
Chan, H. C. O., & Wong, D. S. W.(2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies:Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98-108.
Ciarrochi, J., Hynes, K., & Crittenden, N. (2005). Can men do better if they try harder:Sex and motivational effects on emotional awareness.Cognition and Emotion, 19(1), 133-141.
Cunningham, N. J. (2007). Level of bonding to school and perception of the school environment by bullies, victims, and bully victims.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(4), 457-478.
Duffy, A. L., & Nesdale, D. (2009).Peer groups, social identity, and children's bullying behavior. Social Development, 18(1), 121-139.
Elledge, L, C., Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., DePaolis, K. J., Little, T. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Individual and contextual predictors of cyberbullying:The influence of children's provictim attitudes and teachers' ability to intervene. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 698-710.
Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005).Bullying:Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20(1), 81-91.
Feldman Barrett, L., Lane, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Schwartz, G. E. (2000).Sex differences in emotional awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1027-1035.
Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X., Sheras, P., Shih, T.-H., & Huang, F. (2010).Authoritative school discipline:High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 483-496.
Gregus, S. J., Rodriguez, J. H., Pastrana, F. A., Craig, J. T., McQuillin, S. D., & Cavell, T. A. (2017).Teacher self-efficacy and intentions to use antibullying practices as predictors of children's peer victimization. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 304-319.
Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2002).Peer victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(1), 59-68.
Hektner, J. M., & Swenson, C. A. (2012).Links from teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention:Tests of mediating processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(4), 516-536.
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000).Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology,28(1), 59-81.
Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007).Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 984-994.
Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012).A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school:An ecological system analysis.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322.
Jacobsen, K. E., & Bauman, S. (2007).Bullying in schools:School counselors' responses to three types of bullying incidents. Professional School Counseling, 11(1), 1-9.
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpelä, A., & Rantanen, P. (1999).Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents:School survey. British Medical Journal, 319(7206), 348-351.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts:Bystanders' behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261-282.
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization:Three processes of attitude change.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60.
Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2008). Peer victimization, depression, and suicidality in adolescents.Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 38(2), 166-180.
Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., & Puura, K. (2001).Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying.Aggressive Behavior,27(2), 102-110.
Lovegrove, P. J., & Cornell, D. G. (2014). Patterns of bullying and victimization associated with other problem behaviors among high school students:A conditional latent class approach.Journal of Crime and Justice, 37(1), 5-22.
Mishna, F., Scarcello, I., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2005).Teachers' understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(4), 718-738.
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014).Bullying prevalence across contexts:A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602-611.
Newman, R. S., Murray, B., & Lussier, C. (2001). Confrontation with aggressive peers at school:Students' reluctance to seek help from the teacher.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 398-410.
Nishina, A., & Juvonen, J. (2005).Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76(2), 435-450.
Olweus, D. (1993).Bullying at school:What we know and what we can do. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
Rigby, K. (1997).Attitudes and beliefs about bullying among Australian school children. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 202-220.
Rivers, I., Poteat, V. P., Noret, N., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school:The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211-223.
Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys.Child Development, 73(6), 1830-1843.
Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015).Reducing bullying and victimization:Student-and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.
Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006).Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students:Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 261-275.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003).Bullying and victimization:Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735-747.
Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009).Empirical test of bullies' status goals:Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige.Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57-67.
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004).The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs:A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 547-560.
Sumter, S. R., Bokhorst, C. L., Steinberg, L., & Westenberg, P. M. (2009).The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence:Will the teenager ever be able to resist? Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 1009-1021.
Swearer, S. M., & Cary, P. T. (2003). Perceptions and attitudes toward bullying in middle school youth:A developmental examination across the bully/victim continuum.Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 63-79.
VanZoeren, S., & Weisz,N. A. (2017). Teachers' perceived likelihood of intervening in bullying situations:Individual characteristics and institutional environments.Journal of School Violence, 17(2), 258-269.
Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 37-45.
Yoon, J. S., & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying:Elementary teachers' attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27-35.
陈武英, 卢家楣, 刘连启, 林文毅. (2014). 共情的性别差异. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1423-1434.
刘建榕. (2003). 不同性别学童攻击行为与家庭环境的关系. 健康心理学杂志, 11(2), 103-106.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
臧刚顺. (2012). 交往越轨同伴对青少年犯罪的影响. 心理科学进展, 20(4), 552-560.
张河川, 郭思智. (2005). 青少年烟酒滥用的性别差异及社会心理因素分析. 中国学校卫生, 26(4), 280-282.
张文新, 王益文, 鞠玉翠, 林崇德. (2001). 儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素. 心理发展与教育, 17(1), 12-17.
张文新. (2002). 中小学生欺负/受欺负的普遍性与基本特点. 心理学报, 34(4), 387-394.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
周华珍, 焦培瑶. (2018). 健康问题的社会决定因素对校园欺凌的影响. 社会建设,5(3), 42-54.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[4] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[5] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[6] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[7] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[8] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[9] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[10] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[11] 肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式:心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[12] 严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[13] 白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[14] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[15] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!