青少年家庭功能、人际适应和网络欺凌的关系:一个有调节的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.04.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨青少年家庭功能、人际适应和网络欺凌的关系以及性别在其中的调节作用，采用问卷法对北京和昆明共计1921名中学生进行研究。结果表明：（1）青少年群体中，男生的网络欺凌得分显著高于女生；（2）整体上，人际适应在家庭功能和网络欺凌关系间起完全中介作用；（3）性别在人际适应对青少年网络欺凌的影响中起显著调节作用，具体表现为：与男生相比，人际适应良好的女生实施网络欺凌的可能性更小。结果提示，良好的家庭功能可以通过影响人际适应进而影响青少年网络欺凌的实施，且在此过程中存在性别差异，对女生而言，着力提高社会人际适应能力更具针对性。

关键词: 青少年, 家庭功能, 人际适应, 网络欺凌

Abstract: This study aims to examine the relationships among family function, interpersonal adaptation and cyberbullying of adolescents and the moderating effect of gender. The General Family Function Questionnaire, the Adolescent Interpersonal Adaptation scale and the Cyberbullying Questionnaire were administered to 1,921 adolescents from junior and high middle schools in Beijing and Kunming in China. The results showed that: (1) Adolescents’ family function, interpersonal adaptation and cyberbullying were significantly related to each other; (2) After controlling for family socioeconomic status (SES), interpersonal adaptation completely mediated the relationship between family function and adolescents' cyberbullying behavior; (3) Gender moderated the relationship between interpersonal adaptation and cyberbullying of adolescents. Specifically, compared with boys, girls with good interpersonal adaptation would participate in less cyberbullying. The results suggest that favorable famidy function can reduce adolescents' cyber budlying by affecting interpersonal adaptation. In addition, there are gender differences in this process. For girds, it is more targeted to improve social interpersonal adaptability.

Key words: adolescents, family function, interpersonal adaptation, cyberbullying

中图分类号:

B844

王博晨, 金灿灿, 赵宝宝. 青少年家庭功能、人际适应和网络欺凌的关系:一个有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 469-476.

WANG Bochen, JIN Cancan, ZHAO Baobao. Relationships among Family Function, Interpersonal Adaptation and Cyberbullying of Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Effect[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(4): 469-476.

参考文献

Ahmadi, M., Namazizadeh, M., & Mokhtari, P. (2012). Perceived motivational climate, basic psychological needs and self determined motivation in youth male athletes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(9), 1189-1195.
Appel, M., Stiglbauer, B., Batinic, B., & Holtz, P. (2014). Internet use and verbal aggression: The moderating role of parents and peers. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(2), 235-241.
Barlett, C., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 474-488.
Beavers, R., & Hampson, R. B. (2000). The Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 128-143.
Beckman, L., Hagquist, C., & Hellstrom, L. (2013). Discrepant gender patterns for cyberbullying and traditional bullying-an analysis of swedish adolescent data. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1896-1903.
Buelga, S., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Cava, M. (2017). Differences in family climate and family communication among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyber bully-victims in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 164-173.
Buelga, S., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Musitu, G. (2015). Family relationships and cyberbullying. In Cyberbullying Across the Globe: Gender, Family, and Mental Health (pp. 99-114). Springer International Publishing.
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128-1135.
Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34(6), 613-629.
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34(6), 575-612.
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., Shi, N., & Lee, M. K. O. (2015). Gender differences in satisfaction with facebook users. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(1), 182-206.
Fletcher, A., Fitzgerald-Yau, N., Jones, R., Allen, E., Viner, R. M., & Bonell, C. (2014). Brief report: Cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with socio-demographics, aggressive behaviour at school, and mental health outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1393-1398.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711-722.
Hung, K., & Petrick, J. F. (2012). Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: An alternative decision-making model. Tourism Management, 33(4), 855-867.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 2(4), 589-611.
Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2010). Extending the school grounds? —Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505.
Karabacak, K., Öztunç, M., Eksio?lu, S., Erdo?an, D. G., Yar, S., Ekenler, D., et al. (2015). Determination of the level of being cyber bully/victim of eighth grade students of elementary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 846-853.
Kiriakidis, S. P., & Kavoura, A. (2010). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature on harassment through the internet and other electronic means. Fam Community Health, 33(2), 82-93.
Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., & Markos, A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 204-214.
Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2018). Bullying, moral disengagement and empathy: Exploring the links among early adolescents. Educational Psychology, 38(4), 535-552.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137.
Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Dolev-Cohen, M. (2015). Comparing cyberbullying and school bullying among school students: Prevalence, gender, and grade level differences. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 1-16.
Leflot, G., van Lier, P. A. C., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2013). The role of children's on-task behavior in the prevention of aggressive behavior development and peer rejection: A randomized controlled study of the good behavior game in Belgian elementary classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 51(2), 187-199.
Li, D., Zhang, W., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2016). Stressful life events and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 408-415.
Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Social Science Computer Review, 8(1), 1-12.
Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully-victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63-70.
Portman, T. A. A., Bartlett, J. R., & Carlson, L. A. (2011). Relational theory and intergenerational connectedness: A qualitative study. Adultspan Journal, 9(2), 88-102.
Sharma, M. K., & Marimuthu, P. (2014). Prevalence and psychosocial factors of aggression among youth. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 36(1), 48-53.
Sijtsema, J. J., Nederhof, E., Veenstra, R., Ormel, J., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2013). Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The tracking adolescents’ individual lives survey study. Development and Psychopathology, 25(3), 699-712.
Solecki, S., McLaughlin, K., & Goldschmidt, K. (2014). Promoting positive offline relationships to reduce negative online experiences. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 29(5), 482-484.
Taylor, L. K., Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2014). Trajectories of adolescent aggression and family cohesion: The potential to perpetuate or ameliorate political conflict. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(2), 114-128.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244-249.
Wong, T. Y., Yuen, K. S. L., & Li, W. O. (2014). A basic need theory approach to problematic Internet use and the mediating effect of psychological distress. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01562
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(5), 662-674.
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21.
程玉洁, 邹泓. (2011). 中学生人际适应的特点及其与家庭功能、情绪智力的关系. 中国特殊教育, (2), 65-70, 89.
段东园, 程琪, 张学民, 夏裕祁. (2014). 中学生消极人际关系、焦虑、暴力媒体接触程度和攻击行为的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(2), 281-284.
方晓义, 徐洁, 孙莉, 张锦涛. (2004). 家庭功能:理论、影响因素及其与青少年社会适应的关系. 心理科学进展, 12(4), 544-553.
金灿灿. (2013). 犯罪未成年人的社会适应及其影响因素. 北京:中央编译出版社, 88-91.
雷雳. (2016). 互联网心理学: 新心理与行为研究的兴起. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 56-57.
雷雳, 李征, 谢笑春, 舒畅. (2015). 青少年线下攻击与网络欺负的关系:交叉滞后检验. 苏州大学学报:教育科学版, (3), 92-101.
刘红云. (2019). 高级心理统计. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 277-278.
罗喆慧, 万晶晶, 刘勤学, 方晓义. (2010). 大学生网络使用、网络特定自我效能与网络成瘾的关系. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 618-626.
施春华, 王一茜, 张静, 王宝军. (2017). 初中生自尊和网络攻击行为的关系:人际关系的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(5), 704-709.
田菲菲, 田录梅. (2014). 亲子关系、朋友关系影响问题行为的3种模型. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 968-976.
王孟成. (2014). 潜变量建模与Mplus应用·基础篇. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 233-234.
夏天生, 刘君, 顾红磊, 董书亮. (2016). 父母冲突对青少年攻击行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 503-512.
谢真真. (2016). 中学生共情、道德推脱与网络欺负的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 河北大学,保定.
易娟, 杨强, 叶宝娟. (2016). 压力对青少年问题性网络使用的影响:基本心理需要和非适应性认知的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 644-647.
余益兵. (2009). 中学生社会适应状况的评估及其家庭危险性因素与保护性因素(博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.
张栋玲, 王美芳. (2013). 初中生道德脱离与主动性攻击反应性攻击的关系. 中国学校卫生, 34(12), 1467-1469, 1472.
赵宝宝, 金灿灿, 邹泓. (2018). 青少年亲子关系、消极社会适应和网络成瘾的关系:一个有中介的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 34 (3), 353-360.
赵宝宝, 金灿灿, 吴玉婷. (2018). 家庭功能对青少年网络欺凌的影响:链式中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(6), 1146-1151.
中国互联网络信息中心. (2018). 第42次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. 2018年10月6日, 取自中国互联网络信息中心网址:http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201808/t20180820_70488.htm
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
周晖, 张豹, 谭锐, 黄鸣鹤. (2008). 中学生社会适应状况问卷的编制及其信效度的初步检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 16(9), 1005-1007.
邹泓, 李晓巍, 张文娟. (2010). 青少年家庭人际关系的特点及其对社会适应的作用机制. 心理科学, 33(5), 1136-1141.
邹泓, 余益兵, 周晖, 刘艳. (2012). 中学生社会适应状况评估的理论模型建构与验证. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 65-72.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.