心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 462-468.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.04.09

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响

汪海彬1, 张鹏程2, 卢家楣3, 瞿琼1, 张燕1   

  1. 1. 黄山学院教育科学学院, 黄山 245041;
    2. 南通大学教育科学学院, 南通 226019;
    3. 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234
  • 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 卢家楣, 张鹏程 E-mail:lujiamei@vip.163.com;zpc03091082@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学青年项目(CBA160184)。

Attentional Bias in Different Level of Pre-service Teachers' Emotional Awareness

WANG Haibin1, ZHANG Pengcheng2, LU Jiamei3, QU Qiong1, ZHANG Yan1   

  1. 1. School of Educational Science, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041;
    2. School of Educational Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226019;
    3. College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234
  • Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 采用修订的情绪觉察水平量表(LEAS)对315名职前教师进行调查,并从中筛选出高、低情绪觉察能力组被试各60人,分别完成情绪面孔Stroop任务(研究1)和情绪词Stroop任务(研究2)。(1)研究1的正确率上,中性面孔最高,愉快面孔次之,悲伤面孔最差;反应时上,悲伤面孔最长,愉快面孔次之,中性面孔最短;高分组仅在愉快和中性面孔上的反应时长于低分组;消极面孔的干扰效应高于积极面孔的干扰效应。(2)研究2的反应时上,消极词的反应时最长,显著长于中性和积极词;高分组仅在积极词和中性词上的反应时长于低分组,且高分组在积极词上的干扰效应高于低分组。研究结果表明与中性刺激相比,高低情绪觉察能力组均对情绪刺激产生了注意偏向,尤其是负性情绪刺激;与低情绪觉察能力组相比,高情绪觉察能力职前教师不仅对消极情绪信息产生注意偏向,还对积极情绪信息产生注意偏向。

关键词: 职前教师, 情绪觉察能力, 注意偏向

Abstract: 315 pre-service teachers were surveyed by the Chinese version of Leaves of Emotional Awareness Scale(LEAS)to filter out the high and low emotional awareness group, the subjects of two groups were both 60,and then ask them to make the appropriate judgment of emotional faces Stroop paradigm (Study 1) and emotional words Stroop paradigm (Study 2). The results as follow: (1) the results of study 1 showed that the accuracy rate of the neutral faces was the highest, followed by the happy faces and sad faces; the response time of the sad faces were the longest, followed by the happy faces and neutral faces; the interference effect of sad faces was higher than that of the happy faces; (2) the results of study 2 showed that the response time of the negative words were the longest, and the response time of high score group was significantly longer than low score group in response only to the positive and neutral words, and their interference effects of positive words was higher. It showed that compared with the neutral stimuli, the all participants paid attention to emotional stimuli, especially the negative emotional stimuli. Compared with low emotional awareness group, high emotional awareness group not only paid attention to negative emotional stimuli, but also paid attention to positive emotional information.

Key words: pre-service teacher, emotional awareness, attentional bias

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Anttila, H., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2017). From anxiety to enthusiasm: emotional patterns among student teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 447-464.
Benbrika, S., Doidy, F., Carluer, L., Mondou, A., Buhour, M. S., Eustache, F., et al. (2018). Alexithymia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Its Neural Correlates. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 566.
Beveren, M. L. V., Goossens, L., Volkaert, B., Grassmann, C., Wante, L., Vandeweghe, L., et al. (2018). How do I feel right now? Emotional awareness, emotion regulation, and depressive symptoms in youth. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(3), 389-398.
Chhatwal, J., & Lane, R. D. (2016). A Cognitive-Developmental Model of Emotional Awareness and Its Application to the Practice of Psychotherapy. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 44(2), 305-325.
Coats, A. H., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2008). Emotion regulation in interpersonal problems: the role of cognitive-emotional complexity, emotion regulation goals, and expressivity. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 39-51.
Lane, R. D., Quinlan, D. M., Schwartz, G. E., Walker, P. A., & Zeitlin, S. B. (1990). The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale: a cognitive-developmental measure of emotion. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(1-2), 124-134.
Lane, R. D., & Schwartz, G. E. (1987). Levels of emotional awareness: a cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychopathology. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(2), 133-143.
Lichev, V., Sacher, J., Ihme, K., Rosenberg, N., Quirin, M., Lepsien, J., et al. (2015). Automatic emotion processing as a function of trait emotional awareness: an fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(5), 680-689.
Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., Mogle, J. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2014). Age, stress, and emotional complexity: results from two studies of daily experiences. Aging, 29(3), 577-587.
Smith, R., Killgore, W., Alkozei, A., & Lane, R. D. (2018). A Neuro-Cognitive Process Model of Emotional Intelligence. Biological Psychology, 139, 131-151.
Smith, R., Quinlan, D., Schwartz, G. E., Sanova, A., Alkozei, A., & Lane, R. D. (2019). Developmental Contributions to Emotional Awareness. Journal of Personality, 101(2), 150-158.
Zarotti, N., Simpson, J., Fletcher, I., Squitieri, F., & Migliore, S. (2018). Exploring emotion regulation and emotion recognition in people with presymptomatic Huntington's disease: the role of emotional awareness. Neuropsychologia, 112, 1-9.
蔡文鹏, 于海波, 张水淼, 潘昱, 邓光辉, 严进. (2015). 高抑郁军人情绪词注意偏向特点:基于情绪Stroop任务的实证研究. 解放军医学杂志, 40(12), 1015-1018.
陈俊, 易晓文. (2009). 拖延行为个体对人格特征词、拖延词的注意偏向. 心理科学, 32(2), 316-319.
戴美霞, 杨文翰, 梁晶晶, 林力孜, 肖启蓬, 郭翠华等. (2016). 大学生情绪注意偏向表现及其性别差异的实验研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(11), 858-863.
戴珅懿, 马庆国, 王小毅. (2011). 网络游戏成瘾者对成瘾相关线索的注意偏向:一项ERP研究. 心理科学, 34(6), 1302-1307.
宫火良, 郑希付. (2010). 高述情障碍者的信息选择特征. 心理科学, 33(3), 593-595.
胡竹菁. (2010). 平均数差异显著性检验统计检验力和效果大小的估计原理与方法. 心理学探新, 30(1), 68-73.
胡竹菁, 戴海琦. (2011). 方差分析的统计检验力和效果大小的常用方法比较. 心理学探新, 31(3), 254-259.
刘萍, 孙俊才, 李丹. (2018). 高共情者对高兴面孔的注意偏向及其眼动证据.第二十一届全国心理学学术会议, 北京.
李翔宇, 郑希付. (2010). 病理性网络使用者对情绪信息的注意偏向研究. 心理发展与教育, 26(4), 357-363.
刘亚, 王振宏. (2011). 情绪Stroop效应与Stroop效应的关系. 心理科学, 34(4), 806-812.
刘文娟, 沈曼琼, 李莹, 王瑞明. (2016). 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响. 心理学报, 48(2), 163-173.
彭家欣, 杨奇伟, 罗跃嘉. (2013). 不同特质焦虑水平的选择性注意偏向. 心理学报, 45(10), 1085-1093.
彭晓哲, 周晓林. (2005). 情绪信息与注意偏向. 心理科学进展, 13(4), 488-496.
沈潘艳, 兰继军. (2018). 污名/反污名信息对被污名群体注意偏向的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(4), 675-679.
汪海彬, 卢家楣, 姚本先, 桑青松, 陈宁, 唐晓晨. (2015). 职前教师情绪复杂性对情绪面孔加工的影响——来自行为、ERP和眼动的证据. 心理学报, 47(1), 50-65.
汪海彬, 卢家楣, 陈宁. (2013). 情绪智力的基础:情绪觉察的研究现状与展望. 心理科学,36(3), 748-752.
王曼, 黄敏儿, 谢永标. (2016). 情绪复杂性对精神症状的影响途径及干预技术. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 66-72.
王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(4), 21-23.
王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. (2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22(8), 608-612.
尹筱莉. (2012). 课堂教学特质论:对专家型与新手型化学教师课堂教学的深度解析. 北京: 科学教育出版社.
[1] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[2] 张妍, 王峥, 罗娜, 王小莹, 李晓南. 失恋经历对爱情相关刺激注意偏向的影响:趋近还是回避?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 12-20.
[3] 吴捷, 魏芙蓉, 李佳琪, 吴瑕. 高中生的亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 159-166.
[4] 刘希平, 王贝妮, 唐卫海. 阈下情绪面孔的注视线索提示效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 129-137.
[5] 雷玉菊, 贺金波, 牛更枫, 周宗奎, 田媛. 网络成瘾倾向者对负性表情注意的脱离困难[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 691-699.
[6] 李海江, 卢家楣, 张庆林, 邱江. 阈下抑郁个体对负性情绪刺激的注意解脱困难[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 513-520.
[7] 张林, 刘燊, 谢文澜, 李文涛. 成年期残疾个体对不同类型社交线索的注意偏向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 676-684.
[8] 李海江, 贾磊, 罗俊龙, 杨娟, 张庆林, 李冰冰. 低自尊个体注意偏向的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 2-9.
[9] 王海涛, 黄珊珊, 黄月胜, 孙孝游, 郑希付. PTSD青少年对威胁图片注意偏向的时程特点及习惯化倾向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 255-262.
[10] 王钢, 张大均. 吸烟者对香烟相关线索注意偏向的研究述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 543-552.
[11] 李翔宇, 郑希付. 病理性网络使用者对情绪信息的注意偏向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(4): 357-363.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!