心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 491-499.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母与青少年的信任水平及代际传递

池丽萍   

  1. 中华女子学院儿童发展与教育学院, 北京 100101
  • 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 池丽萍,E-mail:lipingchi@sina.com E-mail:lipingchi@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金项目(11CSH046).

Trust Level of Adolescents and Their Parents and Its Intergenerational Transmission

CHI Li-ping   

  1. School of Child Development and Education, China Women's University, Beijing 100101, China
  • Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-15

摘要: 以往研究指出,人际信任有其家庭根源。本研究以198个家庭中的青少年及其父母为研究对象,采用投资博弈任务测量子女及其父母的信任水平,考察他们的信任水平的特点及父母和子女之间是否存在信任的代际传递现象。研究结果发现:(1)青少年男生的信任水平稍高于女生,父亲的信任水平高于母亲;(2)父亲和母亲的信任水平都不能预测女生的信任水平;但父亲信任水平能线性预测其儿子的信任;母亲与儿子的信任水平则呈倒U型曲线关系。本研究结果证实了信任存在代际传递的现象,并揭示了父母角色及子女性别在信任代际传递中的调节作用,对于进一步理解信任在家庭内的传递过程有启发意义。

关键词: 信任, 代际传递, 投资博弈, 青少年

Abstract: Previous studies on intergenerational transmission found that parents could transmit some of their characteristics, values and behaviors to their children. Some researchers concluded the level of parent' s trust correlated to that of their child, that is, there exists intergenerational transmission of interpersonal trust. Studies from the United States of America, Canada and Germany provided evidences. By now, no empirical research has been done in China to examine the intergenerational transmission of trust. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how parents' trust predict their child's trust. Research in this aspect may shed light on the family origins of people's interpersonal trust.Some research about intergenerational transmission of trust found that father and mother played different roles in development of child's trust. Some studies showed that father's level of trust strongly impacted on that of son, but had little influenced on daughter; whereas trust level of mother affected both son and daughter slightly. A study from Canada indicated it was mother's level of trust, not father's that could predict trust level of their next generation. Recently, German researchers suggestted both father's and mother's trust impacted their offspring's trust. Althought it was not clear that who being more important for offspring's development of trust, some investigations pointed out parental investment to their offspring influenced the intergenerational transmission of trust: Parents who invest more in the upbringing of their children are more similar to them with respect to trust attitudes; thus transmit their own attitudes more strongly. A study of evolutionay psychology found that father invested in son more than daughter, while mother's investment in son and daughter were same. So it can be concluded that the trust level of boy's father would predict offspring's trust level more strongly than that of girl's father; and both boy's and girl's mother influence her offspring's trust level indifferently. Based on a Chinese sample of 198 parents-adolescent pairs, the present study aimed to examine whether parents' trust could be transmitted to their offspring or not. The study collected pariticipants' responses to trust game by questionnare to measure their interpersonal trust. Each participant including adolescent and adult was asked to decide how much money would he or she like to send a stranger and guess how much would the stranger return to him or her after receiving pariticipant's money. The amount of money pariticipants sending and estimating to be returned was used to measure the level of trust. The results showed that (1) the rate of amount of money sending from adolescents and their fathers and mothers were 57.3%, 56.7% and 54.8%, respectively; and fathers' trust levels were higher than mothers'; and male adolescents were more trusting than female. (2) Gender of the offspring impacted on the strength of intergenerational transmission. Parents' trust could not predict their daughter's trust; whereas they did for sons. The transmission patterns of father and mother were different: relationship of father's and son's trust level fit a linear model but data of mother's and son's trust fit a negative quadratic model. The study has potentially important implications for understanding the mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of trust, and it is shed light on the basic question of where trust comes from.

Key words: trust, intergenerational transmission, investment game, adolescent

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2

Amato, P. R., & Cheadle, J. (2005). The long reach of divorce: Divorce and child well-being across three generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 191-206.

Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2004). Is trust a bad investment. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts working paper, No. 2004-07, CH-4052, Basel. www. Crema-research. Ch.

Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1, 64-79.

Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2000). Beyond the melting pot: Cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 955-988.

Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 466-476.

Capra, C. M., Lanier, K., & Meer, S. (2008). Attitudinal and behavioral measures of trust: A new comparison. Retrieved July 23, 2012, from http:// ssrn.com/abstract=1091539.

Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., & Lichtenstein, P. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(10), 3721-3726.

Conger, R. D., Neppl, T., Kim, K. J., & Scaramella, L. (2003). Angry and aggressive behavior across three generations: A prospective, longitudinal study of parents and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 143-160.

Cox, J. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46, 260-281.

Courtiol, A., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2009). Birth order affects behaviour in the investment game: Firstborns are less trustful and reciprocate less. Animal Behaviour 78, 1405-1411.

Dean,S. K. (2005). Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. American Economic Review, 95, 1688-1699.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of attitudes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(1), 8-12.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 645-677.

Fagot, B. I., & Hagan, R. (1991). Observations of parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviors: Age and sex effects. Child Development, 62(3), 617-628.

Gróf, M., Lechová, L., Gazda, V., & Kubák, M. (2012). An experiment on the level of trust in an expanded investment game. Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(12), 1308-1312.

Güth, W., Schmidt, C., & Sutter, M. (2007). Bargaining outside the lab: A newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game. The Economic Journal, 117(518),449-469.

Katz, H. A., & Rotter, J. B. (1969). Interpersonal trust scores of college students and their parents. Child Development, 40, 657-661.

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Lundberg, S. (2005). Son, daughters, and parental behavior. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 340-356.

Niemi, R. G., Katz, R. S., & Newman, D. (1980). Reconstructing past partisanship. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 633-651.

Rotenberg, K. J. (1995). The socialization of trust: Parents' and children's interpersonal trust. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 713-726.

Stephen, V. B., Jeffrey, P. C., & Eric, V. (2003). Playing both roles in the trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 195-216.

Zumbuehl, M., Dohmen, T., & Pfann, G. (2012). Parental investment and the intergenerational transmission of economic preferences. Retrieved July 23, 2012, from http:// www.eea-esem.com/eea-esem/2012/m/viewpaper.asp?pid=796

池丽萍. (2013). 信任:父母的代内相似和亲子的代际传递. 心理学报, 45(3), 336-344.

池丽萍, 俞国良. (2011). 教育成就代际传递的机制:资本和沟通的视角. 教育研究, 9, 22-28.

陈叶烽, 叶航, 汪丁丁. (2010). 信任水平的测度及其对合作的影响. 管理世界, (4), 54-64.

洪慧娟,杨俊. (2011). 广州市大学生人格特征、教养方式与人际信任的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 19(7), 847-849.

井维华, 张庆强. (2006). 青少年学生的人际信任度与家庭因素的相关研究. 心理学探新, 25(2), 61-64.

康廷虎, 白学军. (2012). 任务类型和性别属性对人际信任的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 456-462.

王晓田. (2007). 投资决策进化心理学的研究:预期的私人资金分配和父母对子女的差异性精力投入. 心理学报, 39(3), 406-414.

张郢, 牛春娟, 王晓一, 杨绍清. (2011). 大学生的自尊在成人依恋与人际信任的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 19(6), 749-751.

郑璞,俞国良,郑友富. (2010). 经济博弈中儿童信任的发展. 心理发展与教育, 26(4), 378-383.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!