基于线索的顿悟问题解决:图式和表征操作的影响

心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 9-14.

基于线索的顿悟问题解决:图式和表征操作的影响

窦东徽¹, 金萍², 蔡亮²

1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
2. 新疆农业大学附属中学, 乌鲁木齐, 830052

出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
作者简介:窦东徽,男,北京师范大学发展心理研究所博士研究生.E-mail:psy.dough@gmail.com
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:创新人才与教育创新研究(03JZD0034)

Insight Problem Solving under Different Cues: The Latent Common Influence of the Development of Scheme-using Level and Capability of Representation-manipulating

DOU Dong-hui¹, JIN Ping², CAI Liang²

1. Institute of Development psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Affiliated school of Xinjing Agriculture University 830052, China

Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对小学、初中、高中学生共270名被试在不同线索条件下解决顿悟问题T puzzle的表现进行研究,结果表明:(1)由于图式运用水平的发展,知觉定势在单一线索下对高二被试的限制作用更为明显,导致小学五年级和初中二年级被试的问题解决时间短于高中二年级;(2)由于表征操作能力发展水平的限制,增大需操作表征数目的线索不利于五年级被试的问题解决;较高的表征操作能力发展水平使得高二被试在多重线索下有更好的解决成绩;(3)与图式相关的线索并不能有效提高儿童解决顿悟问题的效率。

关键词: 线索, 顿悟问题解决, 图式运用水平, 表征操作能力

Abstract: Schemes and capability of representation-manipulating are two important factors of children's capability of problem-solving.Their interaction decide the variable perform of children's insight problem-solving.We examined 270 subjects at different ages on their performance on a classical insight problem called T Puzzle.The results showed: (1) 5 grade prime school and-grade junior high school subjects showed a better performance on T Puzzle task than-grade high school ones.(2) The cue type with greater representation loading doesn't facilitate low grade children's problem solving.(3) Elder subject showed greater performance on multiple cues,but the cues related to scheme has not help to improve their achievement.This pattern reflects that schemes using and capability of representation-manipulating have developmental simultaneity.

Key words: cues, insight problem solving, scheme-using level, capability of representation-manipulating

中图分类号:

B844.2

窦东徽, 金萍, 蔡亮. 基于线索的顿悟问题解决:图式和表征操作的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 9-14.

DOU Dong-hui, JIN Ping, CAI Liang. Insight Problem Solving under Different Cues: The Latent Common Influence of the Development of Scheme-using Level and Capability of Representation-manipulating[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(4): 9-14.

参考文献

[1] Simon H A,et al.Decision Making and Problem Solving[M].Washington,DC:National Academy Press,1986.
[2] Chen Z,Daehler M W.External and Internal Instantiation of Information Facilitates Transfer in Insight Problem Solving.Contemporary Educational Psychology,2000,25:423-449.
[3] Dominowski R L.,Dallob P I..Insight and problem solving.In R.J.Sternberg & J.E.Davidson(Eds.),The nature of insight,1995,33-62.Cambridge.MA:MIT Press.
[4] Kaplan C A,Simon H A.In Search of Insight,Cognitive Psychology,1990,22:374-419.
[5] Keane M.Modeling problem solving in Gestalt"insight"problems.Irish Journal of Psychology,1989,10:201-215.
[6] Köhler W.Gestalt psychology:An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology.New York:Liveright.1947.
[7] Kintsch W,Greeno J G.Understanding and Solving Word Arithmetic Problems.Psychological Review,1985,92:109-129.
[8] Carrell P L.and Eisterhold J C."Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy",1983,in Carrell,P.L.,Devine,J.and Eskey,D.E.(eds),Interactive App roaehesto Second Language Reading.Cambridge:CUP,1988.
[9] 张卫,林崇德:论儿童发展的新皮亚杰理论,华南师范大学学报.2002,(4):96-103.
[10] Case R.The development of conceptual structures[A].In D.Kuhn,R.Siegler(eds),Handbook of Child Psychology:Cognition,Perception,and Language[Z].NY:John Wibey& Sons,Inc,.1998,745-800.
[11] Fischer K,Bidell T.Dynamic development of psychological structures in action mad thought.In W.Damon(ed).Handbook of Child Psychology,Introduction.NY,John Wiley & Son,Inc,1998,467-562.(4),504-513.
[12] 辛自强.关系-表征复杂性模型的检验.心理学报,2003,35(4),504-513.
[13] Hiroaki K,Suzuki H.Dynamic constraint relaxation as a theory of insight.Bulletin of Cognitive Science,1998,5,69-79.
[14] Ormerod T C,MacGregor J N,Chronicle E P.Bynamics and constraints in insight problem-solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology,Learning.Memory & Cognition.2002,28,791-799.
[15] Enns J T,Brodeur D A.A developmental study of covert orienting to peripheral visual cues.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1989,48:171-189.

相关文章 15

[1]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[2]	郑婉婷, 王薇, 徐利敏, 李莫涵, 徐芝琦, 李永鑫, 赵静, 梁紫嫣, 刘靖佳. 5～7岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童环境文字阅读的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 822-829.
[3]	吴瑕, 钟希苹, 姜云鹏. 不同搜索情境下老化对自上而下注意加工的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 26-34.
[4]	张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[5]	陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 619-627.
[6]	郑晨烨, 黄焰, 王静梅, 姜存对, 卢英俊. 面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[7]	刘湍丽, 单亚菲, 邢敏, 白学军. 工作记忆中的部分线索效应:任务呈现方式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 489-497.
[8]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 掌握程度和社会性线索对元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 641-647.
[9]	刘星泽, 陈明慧, 崔佳伟, 赵光. 真实场景视觉搜索中的背景线索效应特点与机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 504-512.
[10]	刘希平, 王贝妮, 唐卫海. 阈下情绪面孔的注视线索提示效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 129-137.
[11]	王凯旋, 苗沂林, 车晓玮, 李寿欣. 空间工作记忆负载对中央注视线索返回抑制的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 649-655.
[12]	牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 孔繁昌, 范翠英, 魏华. 网络相关文字刺激和压力对网络成瘾者线索诱发渴求的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 495-502.
[13]	赵广平, 周楚, 郭秀艳. 基于熟悉性的项目间语义关系再认[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(4): 385-392.
[14]	郑俊, 张玮, 罗良. 线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 609-615.
[15]	赖颖慧, 陈英和, 陈聪. 视知觉线索对幼儿小数离散量表征的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 337-344.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed