心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 649-655.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.06.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

空间工作记忆负载对中央注视线索返回抑制的影响

王凯旋, 苗沂林, 车晓玮, 李寿欣   

  1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358
  • 出版日期:2018-11-15 发布日期:2018-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 李寿欣,E-mail:shouxinli@sdnu.edu.cn E-mail:shouxinli@sdnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31470973)。

The Influence of Spatial Working Memory Load on Inhibition of Return Elicited by Central Gaze Cue

WANG Kaixuan, MIAO Yilin, CHE Xiaowei, LI Shouxin   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358
  • Online:2018-11-15 Published:2018-12-27

摘要: 通过两个实验,探讨空间工作记忆负载对中央注视线索引发返回抑制(inhibition of return,IOR)的影响。实验一通过再认面孔的相似度来控制与中央注视线索相关的空间工作记忆任务负载,结果发现,高任务负载条件下出现IOR,低任务负载条件下中央注视线索促进搜索;实验二在实验一高任务负载的基础上加入与注视线索无关的空间工作记忆任务,结果发现,仅在与注视线索无关的空间工作记忆负载低的条件下出现IOR。结果表明,中央注视线索引发的IOR受到空间工作记忆资源的限制,中央注视线索只有在获得足够的资源时才能引发IOR。注视线索获得空间工作记忆资源多少决定中央注视线索能否引发IOR。

关键词: 返回抑制, 空间工作记忆, 中央注视线索, 负载

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to explore the influence of spatial working memory(SWM)load on inhibition of return (IOR) elicited by central gaze cue. In experiment 1, the cue relevant SWM load was manipulated by changing the similarity between the recognition and memory faces. The results showed that IOR was observed when the cue relevant SWM load was high, while no IOR was observed under low SWM load condition. Experiment 2 was conducted based on the condition that IOR was elicited by central gaze cue in experiment 1, and an additional cue irrelevant SWM task was presented before the gaze cue. The results showed that IOR was observed when the cue irrelevant SWM load was low, while IOR disappeared when the load was high. Taken together, our results revealed that IOR elicited by central gaze cue could be mediated by SWM resources. Whether IOR be elicited by central gaze cue may depend on the degree to which SWM resources was allocated to central gaze cue.

Key words: inhibition of return, spatial working memory, central gaze cue, load

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 1-11.
Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development:Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10 (1), 48-71.
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return:Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(6), 970-981.
Chica, A. B., Bartolomeo, P., & Lupiáez, J. (2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237(1), 107-123.
Chou, W. L., & Yeh, S. L. (2008). Location-and object-based inhibition of return are affected by different kinds of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1761-1768.
Cohen, M. A., Konkle, T., Rhee, J. Y., Nakayama, K., & Alvarez, G. A. (2014). Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8955-8960.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490-495.
Frischen, A., Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues:The roles of time course and fixation cue. Visual Cognition, 15(8), 881-895.
Frischen, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects:implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133(4), 516-533.
Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks:Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1114-1126.
Jiang, Y. V., Lee, H. J., Asaad, A., & Remington, R. (2016). Similarity effects in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 476-482.
Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334(6181), 430-431.
Langton, S. R. H. & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 541-567.
McDonnell, G. P., & Dodd, M. D. (2013). Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(4),933-940.
Michael, D., Stefan, V. S., & Andrew, H. (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy:Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20(3), 333-339.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention:Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315-330.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X:ontrol of language processes, 32(4), 531-556.
Silk, T. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Wrafter, P., Mattingley, J. B., & Cunnington, R. (2010). Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus. NeuroImage, 53(2), 718-724.
Vivas, A. B., Liaromati, I., Masoura, E., & Chatzikallia, K. (2010). Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return. Psychological Research, 74(6), 524-531.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 269-274.
Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture:Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 20(1), 95-107.
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). Spatial working memory load impairs manual but not saccadic inhibition of return. Vision research, 51(1), 147-153.
陈衍, 陈新宇, 田颖, 白学军. (2014). 视空间工作记忆负荷对返回抑制影响的年老化研究. 现代预防医学, 41(20), 3738-3740.
顾本柏. (2011). 客体相似性表征的认知和发展机制研究(博士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
秦速励, 沈政. (2001). 面孔识别的"特殊性". 心理科学, 24(5), 604-605.
徐岩, 张亚旭, 周晓林. (2003). 面孔加工的认知神经科学研究:回顾与展望. 心理科学进展, 11(1), 35-43.
杨华海, 赵晨. (1998). 外源性视觉选择性注意的时空特征. 心理学报, 30(2), 136-142.
张智君, 赵亚军, 占琪涛. (2011). 注视方向的知觉对注视追随行为的影响. 心理学报, 43(7), 726-738.
赵静, 潘毅. (2010). 工作记忆内容对空间返回抑制的影响. 心理学探新, 30(115), 42-46.
赵亚军, 张智君. (2009). 眼睛注视线索提示效应:内源性注意还是外源性注意? 心理学报, 41(12), 1133-1142.
[1] 吴文春, 陈嘉倩, 刘昌. 客体和空间工作记忆中三维图形的特征加工时程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 513-521.
[2] 陈春宇, 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 柴唤友, 周宗奎. 社交网站成瘾与青少年抑郁的关系:认知负载和核心自我评价的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 210-218.
[3] 吴文春, 孙悦亮, 徐学. 三维图形的客体和空间工作记忆存储机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 145-152.
[4] 吴文春. 两维特征图形的客体和空间工作记忆存储研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 247-254.
[5] 罗良, 林崇德, 陈桄. 注意次级任务对客体与空间工作记忆信息保持的选择性干扰[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 561-568,576.
[6] 罗良, 林崇德. 言语次级干扰任务对客体与空间信息保持的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 113-120.
[7] 钞秋玲, 沈德立, 白学军. 儿童青少年返回抑制发展的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 23-28.
[8] 衣琳琳, 苏彦捷, 王甦. 同时线索化条件下儿童返回抑制的容量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(3): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!