心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 385-392.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.04.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

基于熟悉性的项目间语义关系再认

赵广平1,2, 周楚1, 郭秀艳3   

  1. 1. 复旦大学心理系, 上海 200433;
    2. 闽南师范大学心理系, 漳州 363000;
    3. 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062
  • 出版日期:2015-07-15 发布日期:2015-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 周楚,E-mail:zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn E-mail:zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31271090);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA190026);国家社会科学基金教育类国家青年课题(CBA120104).

Familiarity-based Recognition of Inter-item Semantic Relations

ZHAO Guangping1,2, ZHOU Chu1, GUO Xiuyan3   

  1. 1. Department of psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;
    2. Department of psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China;
    3. School of Psychology and Cognition Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Online:2015-07-15 Published:2015-07-15

PDF (PC)

被引次数

1

摘要： 在项目间语义关系的熟悉性研究中, 一个关键问题是熟悉性效应依赖于哪种信息的加工, 关系概念还是抽象结构?研究通过两个实验, 借助无线索回忆再认范式(the recognition without cued recall paradigm, 简称RWCR范式)和四词类比材料, 采用混合设计, 直接分离与比较关系概念和抽象结构的加工对RWCR效应的影响。结果发现, 关系概念作为测验线索能够引发显著RWCR效应, 但仅仅学习关系概念却不能;只有学习关系概念的结构化材料时, 才能引发显著RWCR效应。该结果表明, 项目间语义关系的熟悉性过程与结构信息有关。

关键词: 项目间语义关系, 熟悉性, 无线索回忆再认

Abstract: Among cues that fail to elicit successful recall, participants can still discriminate based on familiarity between cues that do and do not resemble studied inter-item semantic relations. In the laboratory, this ability is referred to as recognition without cued recall (RWCR). One theoretical question is whether inter-item relational RWCR is driven by relational concept or by abstract structure processing. We hypothesized that the RWCR could be supported by abstract structure information between items.
240 word pairs and relational concepts were used in RWCR paradigm, in which participants studied some items and were shown new items at test, half of which related to studied items and half of which did not. For each test item, participants first attempted to recall a related item from the study list. Then, regardless of whether successful recall occurred, participants were prompted to rate the familiarity of the test pair, which was said to indicate the likelihood that an item was similar to the test item studied. To examine how abstract structure vs. relational concept affected RWCR effect, Experiment 1 controlled test condition and used 2 study status (within-subjects: studied vs. unstudied)×2 test condition (between-subjects: word-pair vs. relation-concept), in which participants studied word pairs (e.g., lion-gazelle) and were shown two types of test cues (e.g., snake-mouse vs. prey on). Experiment 2 controlled study condition in which participants studied two types of materials (e.g., prey on vs. A prey on B) and were shown word pairs (e.g., snake-mouse).
The results showed that participants demonstrated an ability to recognize inter-item semantic relations without cued recall through familiarity. RWCR effect was found only when relational concepts act as test cues rather than study materials. However, the processing of structured materials of relational concepts in study can cause RWCR effect.
To conclude, the results support that RWCR effect of inter-item semantic relations depends on abstract structure processing at encoding.

Key words: inter-item semantic relations, familiarity, RWCR

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aly, M., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2013). Neural correlates of state-and strength-based perceptions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, in press.
Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 108-124.
Blumenfeld, R. S., Parks, C. M., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2011). Putting the pieces together: the role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in relational memory encoding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 257-265.
Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001). Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(1), 51-61.
Cleary, A. M. (2004). Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(03), 446-451.
Cleary, A. M. (2008). Recognition memory, familiarity, and déjà vu experiences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 353-357.
Cleary, A. M., Brown, A. S., Sawyer, B. D., Nomi, J. S., Ajoku, A. C., & Ryals, A. J. (2012). Familiarity from the configuration of objects in 3-dimensional space and its relation to déjà vu: A virtual reality investigation. Consciousness and cognition, 21(2), 969-975.
Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 1063.
Cleary, A. M., & Specker, L. E. (2007). Recognition without face identification. Memory & cognition, 35(7), 1610-1619.
Cleary, A. M., & Reyes, N. L. (2009). Scene recognition without identification. Acta psychologica, 131(1), 53-62.
Cleary, A. M., Ryals, A. J., & Nomi, J. S. (2009). Can déjà vu result from similarity to a prior experience? Support for the similarity hypothesis of déjà vu. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1082-1088.
Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2009). Analogical transfer from interaction with a simulated physical system. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1406-1411.
Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 1-21.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
Gentner, D. Ratterman, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
Gentner, D., & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd Ed.). pp. 130-136. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
Green, A. E., Fugelsang, J. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2006). Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34 (7), 1414-1421.
Kostic, B., Cleary, A. M., Severin, K., & Miller, S. W. (2010). Detecting analogical resemblance without retrieving the source analogy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 405-411.
Liang, J. Q., & Guo, C. Y. (2012). Dissociating the neural correlates of item retrieval and relational retrieval in. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(005), 625-633.
Mealor, A. D., & Dienes, Z. (2013). The speed of metacognition: Taking time to get to know one's structural knowledge. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 123-136.
Ryals, A. J., & Cleary, A. M. (2012). The recognition without cued recall phenomenon: Support for a feature-matching theory over a partial recollection account. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 747-762.
Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2001). Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 383-393.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?. American Psychologist, 40(4), 385.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517.
Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W. C., & Koen, J. D. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20(11), 1178-1194.
梁九清, 郭春彦. (2012). 跨领域项目间联结记忆中项目提取和关系提取的分离: 一项事件相关电位研究. 心理学报, 44(005), 625-633.
[1] 袁娟娟, 杨炀, 郑志伟, 刘萍萍. 图文横排促进低熟悉词汇再认:基于8岁儿童和成人证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 525-538.
[2] 余玉荣, 张婉璐, 邢强. 编码和检索阶段的异质情境流畅性对再认的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 138-145.
[3] 韩凯, 郝学芹. 学前儿童FOK判断及其产生机制的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1997, 13(1): 6-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发