心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 472-480.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响

郑晨烨1,2, 黄焰1,4, 王静梅1,3, 姜存对5, 卢英俊1,3   

  1. 1. 浙江师范大学儿童研究院, 杭州 310012;
    2. 浙江省级机关北山幼儿园, 杭州 310000;
    3. 浙江师范大学发展认知神经科学实验室, 杭州 310012;
    4. 绍兴市秋瑾中学, 绍兴 312000;
    5. 杭州市滨江区白金海岸幼儿园, 杭州 310000
  • 发布日期:2021-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 卢英俊 E-mail:luyingjun@zjnu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省社科规划一般课题"儿童对卡通面孔与真人面孔认知的神经机制研究"(15JDET02YB)。

The Effect of Face Clues on Real and Cartoon Face Memory of 4~6-year-olds

ZHENG Chenye1,2, HUANG Yan1,4, WANG Jingmei1,3, JIANG Cundui5, LU Yingjun1,3   

  1. 1. Institute of Child Study, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012;
    2. Zhejiang Beishan Kindergarten, Hangzhou 310000;
    3. Lab of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Hangzhou College for Preschool Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012;
    4. Shaoxing Qiujin Middle School, Shaoxing 312000;
    5. Hangzhou Binjiang District Platinum Coast Preschool Education Group, Hangzhou 310000
  • Published:2021-07-26

摘要: 对真人面孔与卡通面孔记忆线索的比较研究,有助于深入认识儿童的面孔认知机制。采用“学习-再认”范式,以内部线索面孔、外部线索面孔和完整面孔为刺激材料,探究面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响。结果发现:(1)女童对真人面孔的记忆显著优于卡通;(2)对卡通面孔的记忆,男童显著优于女童;(3)对真人面孔:完整面孔记忆显著优于内部线索面孔与外部线索面孔;对卡通面孔:外部线索面孔记忆最佳,其次完整面孔,内部线索面孔最低;(4)幼儿对外部与内部线索面孔的记忆能力随年龄逐步提高,6岁显著优于4岁。综上,幼儿对真人面孔与卡通面孔的记忆模式存在差异;且面孔类别、性别、面孔线索与年龄等因素均影响幼儿的面孔记忆。

关键词: 幼儿, 真人面孔, 卡通面孔, 面孔线索, 面孔记忆

Abstract: A comparative study of memory clues between real face and cartoon face can deepen the understanding of children's face recognition mechanism. With paradigm of learning-recognition and stimuli of internal-clue-face, external-clue-face and whole face, the effect of clues on preschoolers' real and cartoon face memory was explored in the present study. The results showed that:(1) females' real face recognition was significantly better than cartoon face recognition; (2) males' cartoon face recognition was better than females'; (3) for real face, recognition of whole face was significantly better than internal-clue-face and external-clue-face; for cartoon face, recognition of external-clue-face was best, followed by whole face and then internal-clue-face; (4) recognition of external-clue-face and internal-clue-face increased by age, and 6-year-olds' were significantly better than 4-year-olds'. To sum up, there was difference in children's memory pattern of real face and cartoon face; face category, gender, face clue and age all influence preschoolers' face memory.

Key words: preschooler, real face, cartoon face, face clue, face memory

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Andrews, T. J., Davies-thompson, J., Kingstone, A., & Young, A. W. (2010). Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 3544-3552.
Bartrip, J., Morton, J., & Schonen, S. D. (2001). Responses to mother's face in 3-week to 5-month-old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(2), 219-232.
Bonner, L., & Burton, M. (2004). 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces:Evidence against a developmental shift. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(6), 1019-1029.
Bushnell, I. W. R., Sai, F., & Mullin, J. T. (1989). Neonatal recognition of the mother's face. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 3-15.
Campbell, R., & Tuck, M. (1995). Recognition of parts of famous-face photographs by children:An experimental note. Perception, 24(4), 451-456.
Chen, H., Russell, R., Nakayama, K., & Livingstone, M. (2010). Crossing the ‘uncanny valley’:Adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception, 39(3), 378-386.
Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2002). Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure. Perception, 31(8), 985-994.
Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2004). Demonstrating the acquired familiarity of faces by using a gender-decision task. Perception, 33(2), 159-168.
Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2005). Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 97-116.
Connellan, J., Baron-cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2001). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 23(1), 113-118.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23(1), 1-22.
Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features:Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8(4), 431-439.
Flin, R. H. (1985). Development of face recognition:An encoding switch? British Journal of Psychology, 76(1), 123-134.
Freire, A., & Lee, K. (2001). Face recognition in 4-to 7-year-olds:Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(4), 347-371.
Geldart, S., Maurer, D., & Henderson, H. (2016). Effects of the height of the internal features of faces on adults' aesthetic ratings and 5-month-olds' looking times. Perception, 21(3), 361-374.
Gilad-Gutnick, S., Harmatz, E. S., Yovel, G., & Sinha, P. (2011). Recognizing facial slivers. Journal of Vision, 11(11), 667-677.
Haan, E. H. F. D., & Kollenburg, E. N. M. (2005). Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces:A visual half-field study. Cognitive Processing, 6(3), 189-195.
Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition:A review. Memory, 17(5), 577-596.
Kramer, R. S. S., Manesi, Z., Towler, A., Reynolds, M. G., & Burton, A. M. (2018). Familiarity and within-person facial variability:The importance of the internal and external features. Perception, 47(1), 3-15.
Lewin, C., & Herlitz, A. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition-women's faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition, 50(1), 121-128.
Mar, R. A., Kelley, W. M., Heatherton, T. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs animated agents. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 199-205.
Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M. (2009). Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces:The headscarf effect. Perception, 38(12), 1831-1848.
Miyahara, M., Bray, A., Tsujii, M., Fujita, C., & Sugiyama, T. (2007). Reaction time of facial affect recognition in asperger's disorder for cartoon and real, static and moving faces. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 38(2), 121-134.
Mondloch, C. J., Grand, R. L., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31(5), 553-566.
O'Donnell, C., & Bruce, V. (2001). Familiarisation with faces selectively enhances sensitivity to changes made to the eyes. Perception, 30(6), 755-764.
Olivares, E. I., & Iglesias, J. (2010). Brain potential correlates of the "internal features advantage" in face recognition. Biological Psychology, 83(2), 133-142.
Pascalis, O., Schonen, S. D., Morton, J., Deruelle, C., & Fabre-Grenet, M. (1995). Mother's face recognition by neonates:A replication and an extension. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(1), 79-85.
Rehnman, J., & Herlitz, A. (2007). Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica, 124(3), 344-355.
Rosset, D. B., Rondan, C., Fonseca, D. D., Santos, A., Assouline, B., & Deruelle, C. (2008). Typical emotion processing for cartoon but not for real faces in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(5), 919-925.
Ryan, K. F., & Gauthier, I. (2016). Gender differences in recognition of toy faces suggest a contribution of experience. Vision Research, 129(12), 69-76.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1), 257-279.
Turati, C., Macchi, C. V., Simion, F., & Leo, I. (2006). Newborns' face recognition:Role of inner and outer facial features. Child Development, 77(2), 297-311.
Want, S. C., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., & Blades, M. (2003). Recognizing people from the inner or outer parts of their faces:Developmental data concerning ‘unfamiliar’ faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 125-135.
Wright, D. B., & Sladden, B. (2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114(1), 101-114.
Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., Mcweeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14(6), 737-746.
程蕾. (2012).5、7、9岁儿童自我面孔的认知发展特点(博士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
韩世辉, 蒋毅, 许晓婧, Humphreys, G.W. (2007). 儿童观看卡通片激活内侧前额皮层. 科学通报, 52(19), 2283-2286.
吕勇, 刘亚平, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 记忆面孔,男女有别:关于面孔再认性别差异的行为与ERP研究. 科学通报, 56(14), 1112-1123.
陆卫红, 葛列众, 李宏汀. (2004). 面孔认知的事件相关电位研究进展. 人类工效学, 10(2), 26-28.
倪瑞凤. (2013). 动画片对儿童情感品质影响的研究(硕士论文学位). 南京师范大学.
王玲, 王静梅, 王军利, 卢英俊. (2012). 卡通面孔与真实面孔识别的ERP比较研究. 心理研究, 5(5), 19-28.
王乾东, 胡超, 傅根跃. (2013). 幼儿面孔加工异族效应的眼动研究.心理学报, 45(2), 169-178.
王哲, 葛列众, 袁中庆. (2010). 5岁儿童对熟悉面孔的特征信息识别. 心理科学, 33(1), 122-125.
赵倩, 王静梅, 徐侃鸿, 卢英俊. (2013). 不同任务情境中5~6岁儿童卡通面孔加工的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 457-465.
[1] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[2] 王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[3] 张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5~6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[4] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[5] 刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[6] 王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[7] 刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[8] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[9] 王薇, 贡德英, 程春, 陈科, 李永鑫, 闫晶晶. 5~7岁自闭症谱系障碍幼儿数感的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[10] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[11] 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[12] 贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[13] 李占星, 朱莉琪. “它”是所有者吗?幼儿对所有权主体的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 465-471.
[14] 施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[15] 王佳乐, 张慧, 杨敏. 情绪效价与面孔类型对幼儿无意视盲的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 153-158.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!