青少年父母监控现状研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 27-31.

青少年父母监控现状研究

邓林园¹, 方晓义¹, 李一飞², 夏培方³, 万晶晶^1,

1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
2. 北京教育科学研究院, 北京, 100037;
3. 中国人民公安大学犯罪学系, 北京, 100038;
4. 华中科技大学政治教育系, 武汉, 430074

出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
通讯作者: 方晓义,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.E-mail:fangxy@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:fangxy@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部人文社科研究“十五”规划资助项目(01JAXLX011)

Adolescent Parental Monitoring State in China

DENG Lin-yuan¹, FANG Xiao-yi¹, LI Yi-fei², XIA Pei-fang³, WAN Jingjing^1,

1. Institute of Development Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences, Beijing 100037;
3. Criminology Department, People's Public Security University, Beijing 100037;
4. Political Education Department, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074

Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究从北京市两所普通中学的初一到高二年级中选取了1090名中学生为被试,采用问卷调查的方式,要求他们分别报告父亲和母亲的主、客观监控水平和监控手段(控制、沟通和搜寻),以探讨我国青少年父母监控的现状。经过(2)卡方检验、相关分析t、检验和方差分析,结果表明:(1)总体来讲,母亲在家庭里是青少年的主要监控者:母亲监控的客观水平高于父亲,并且母亲使用三种监控手段的情况均多于父亲;(2)女孩受到的父母监控超过男孩:母亲对女孩的客观监控水平高于男孩,并且母亲对女孩更多使用沟通手段;父母对女孩使用控制手段的情况超过男孩;(3)父母监控的年级差异并不明显,只有父母对初一学生会更多使用沟通手段;(4)父母对沟通手段和控制手段的使用都与客观监控水平呈正相关,但与主观监控水平呈负相关,而搜寻手段使用与监控水平之间的关系则跟沟通、控制手段相反;沟通手段对客观监控水平的正向预测力最强,搜寻手段对主观监控水平的正向预测力最强。

关键词: 青少年, 父母监控, 监控水平, 监控手段

Abstract: This study aims to explore the state of adolescent parental monitoring (including monitoring status and monitoring method) in China.1090 middle school students (grade 7 to grade 11) from two ordinary middle schools in Beijing completed modified Stattin's Parental Monitoring Scale.The results indicate that: (1) Mothers do more monitoring work in family: objective mother monitoring is higher than father,also are three monitoring methods; (2) Girls are monitored more than boys: objective mother monitoring is higher on girls than boys,and mothers also communicate more with girls; both fathers and mothers use more control method on girls; (3) There is not so much grade difference of parental monitoring,only that parents communicate more with Grade 7 students; (4) Parental communication and control methods are both correlated positively with objective mother monitoring,but negatively with subjective mother monitoring,and solicitation method is just on the contrary; communication method is the best positive predictor of objective mother monitoring,and solicitation method is the best positive predictor of subjective mother monitoring.

Key words: adolescent, parental monitoring, monitoring status, monitoring method

中图分类号:

B844.2

邓林园, 方晓义, 李一飞, 夏培方, 万晶晶. 青少年父母监控现状研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 27-31.

DENG Lin-yuan, FANG Xiao-yi, LI Yi-fei, XIA Pei-fang, WAN Jingjing. Adolescent Parental Monitoring State in China[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(4): 27-31.

参考文献

[1] Hirsch T.Causes of Delinquency.Berkeley:University of Califomia Press,1969.
[2] 方晓义.母亲依恋、父母监控与青少年的吸烟、饮酒行为.心理发展与教育,1995:54-58.
[3] Baker J R,Rosenthal S L,Leonhardt D,et al.Relationship between perceived parental monitoring and young adolescent girls'sexual and substance use behaviors.Pediatric and adolescent gynecology,1999,12:17-22.
[4] Beck K H,Boyle J R,Boekeloo B O.Parental monitoring and adolescent drinking:results of a 12-month follow-up.American journal of health behavior,2004,28(3):272-279.
[5] Beck K H,Boyle J R,Boekeloo B O.Parental monitoring and adolescent alcohol risk in a clinic population.American journal of health behavior,2003,27(2):108-115.
[6] DiClemente R J,Wingoed G M,Cresby R,et al.Parental monitoring:association with adolescents'risk behaviors.Pediatrics,2001,107(6):1363-1368.
[7] Bousman C A,Blumberg E J,Shillington A M.Predictors of substance use among homeless youth in San Diego.Addictive behavior,2005,30:1100-1110.
[8] Crosby R A,DiClemente R J,Wingood G M.Low parental monitoring predicts subsequent pregnancy among African-American adolescent females.Pediatric and adolescent gynecology,2002,15:43-46.
[9] Li X M,Fang X Y,Stnaton B,etc.Parental monitoring among adolescents in Beijing,China.Journal of adolescent health,2003(33):130-132.
[10] Holmbeck G N,Paikoff R L,Brooks-Gunn J.Parenting adolescents.In:Bornstein(ed).Handbook of parenting l:Children and parenting.Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.,1995:91-118.
[11] Stattin H,Kerr M.Parental monitoring:a reinterpretation.Child development,2000,71(4):1072-1085.
[12] Weintraub K J,Gold,M.Monitoring and delinquency.Criminal Behavior.Ment.Heal.1991,1:268-281.
[13] Sheek DTL.Perceived parent-child relational qualities and parental behavioral and psychological control in Chinese adolescents in Hongkong.Adolescence,2006,41(163):563-581.
[14] 《新快报》,2000,4,19,第一版.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed