社会退缩青少年的友谊特点

心理发展与教育 ›› 2005, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 33-36.

社会退缩青少年的友谊特点

万晶晶^1,2, 周宗奎³

1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 10875;
2. 华中科技大学人文学院, 武汉, 430074;
3. 华中师范大学心理学系, 武汉, 430079

出版日期:2005-07-15 发布日期:2005-07-15
作者简介:万晶晶(1975- ),女,武汉人,北京师范大学发展心理研究所博士生.Email:wan_jingjing@163.com

The Research of the Friendships of Adolescents with Social Withdrawal Behavior

WAN Jing-jing^1,2, ZhOU Zong-kui³

1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Human School of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;
3. Department of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079

Online:2005-07-15 Published:2005-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用社会测量法和问卷法调查了初一到初三120对社会退缩儿童友伴的友谊状况。结果显示:(1)退缩男孩组的友谊质量低于女孩组和混合性别组;(2)与非退缩对照组儿童的友谊相比,退缩儿童在班级内的地位较为不利,但其友谊能够发挥正常的功能;(3)多元回归表明受欺侮和亲密交流对退缩行为的正向预测作用较强。建议从群体角度、友谊特性及适应后果等不同层面来综合判断儿童的社会退缩行为。

关键词: 社会退缩, 青少年, 友谊, 受欺侮

Abstract: With the method of sociometric nomination and questionnaire,the friendships of social withdrawal adolescents of 120 mutual dyads from grade 7 to grade 9 were investigated.The results showed:the quality of boy-boy friendship was lower than the mix-gender and girl-girl friendship.When compared with non-withdrawn friendship,withdrawal children lie in somewhat disadvantage status,but their friendships can function properly. Multiple regression showed that victimization and intimate-communication predicted the social withdrawal behavior positively and strongly,while the conflict-betrayal,trust-respect,and the numbers of friendship predicted the social withdrawal behavior negatively.Results are discussed in terms of the implications for prevention and intervention of social withdrawal from mutual friendships and peer relationships.

Key words: Social withdrawal, adolescent, friendship, victimization

中图分类号:

B844.2

万晶晶, 周宗奎. 社会退缩青少年的友谊特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(3): 33-36.

WAN Jing-jing, ZhOU Zong-kui. The Research of the Friendships of Adolescents with Social Withdrawal Behavior[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(3): 33-36.

参考文献

[1] Harrist A W, Zaia A F, Bates J E, et al. Subtypes of social withdrawal in early childhood: sociometric status and social-cognitive differences across four years. Child Development, 1997, 63, 879-892.
[2] 万晶晶,周宗奎.国外儿童同伴关系研究进展.心理发展与教育,2002(3):91-95.
[3] Schneider B H. A multimethod exploration of the friendships of children considered socially withdrawn by their school peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1999, 27, 115-123.
[4] Rubin K H, Bukowski W, Parker J G. Peer intesactions,relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, E. Nancy. Handbook of Child Psychology Vol. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development.New York: Wiley, 1998, 619-700.
[5] Parker J G, Asher S R. Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 1993.29, 611-621.
[6] 邹泓,周晖,周燕.中学生友谊、友谊质量与同伴接纳的关系.北师大学报,1998(1):43-50.
[7] Engfer A. Antecedents and Consequences of Shyness in Boys and Girls: A 6-year Longitudinal Study. In K H Bubin J B. Asendorpf.Social Withdrawal, Inhibition, and Shyness. Hillsdale. New Jersey:Erlbaum, 1993, 49-80.
[8] Molina M G, Coplan R J, Younger A J. A closer look at children's knowledge about social isolation. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2003, 18, 93-104.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed