心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 65-72.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年自我同一性状态的发展及其与父母教养权威性、同一性风格的关系

王树青1, 陈会昌2, 石猛3   

  1. 1. 济南大学政治与公共管理学院心理系, 济南, 250022;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
    3. 西南大学教育学院, 重庆, 400715
  • 出版日期:2008-04-15 发布日期:2008-04-15
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目:儿童心理发展的稳定性和变化性研究(项目号:06JJDXLX002)

Adolescent Ego Identity Status Development and Its Relations with Parenting Authoritativeness and Identity Style

WANG Shu-qing1, CHEN Hui-chang2, SHI Meng3   

  1. 1. Psychology Department, School of Political Science and Public Administration, Jinan 250022;
    2. Institute of Development Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. College of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Online:2008-04-15 Published:2008-04-15

摘要: 采用修订的自我同一性状态问卷、同一性风格问卷和父母教养方式问卷对1233名初中生、高中生和大学生进行调查研究,考察青少年自我同一性状态的发展特点以及父母教养权威性、同一性风格和自我同一性状态之间的关系。结果发现:从初中到高中,青少年的自我同一性状态表现出前进的发展趋势,高中和大学阶段处于四种同一性状态的人数比例不存在明显差异;男大学生比女大学生更多地处于同一性获得状态;父母教养权威性既对同一性状态有直接预测作用,又以同一性风格为中介对其产生间接影响。

关键词: 青少年, 自我同一性, 自我同一性状态, 同一性风格, 父母教养权威性

Abstract: This study investigated adolescents. ego identity status development and the relations among parenting authoritativeness, identity style and ego identity status on 1233 adolescents ranging from middle school to university, using the revised Extend Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status22, Identity Style Inventory23 and Parenting Style Questionnaire. The results indicated as follows: (1) a progressive developmental trend was found on adolescents. identity statuses from junior middle school to senior middle school. There are no significant difference on percentage of four identity statuses between senior middle school and university; (2) Male college students were more on the identity achievement status than female college students. (3) Parenting authoritativeness had both direct and indirect influences on identity statuses. Indirect influences were moderated by informational identity style and diffuse identity style.

Key words: adolescent, ego identity, ego identity status, identity style, parenting authoritativeness

[1] Erikson E.ldentity:Youth and crisis.New York:Norton.1968.
[2] Marcia J E.Development and validation of ego identity status.Journal of personality and.social psychology,1966,3:215-223.
[3] Berzonsky M D.Self-construction over the life span:A process perspective on identity formation.In G.J.Neimeyer & R.A.Neimeyer (Eds.),Advances in personal construct psychology(Vol.l,PP.155-186).Greenwich,CT:JAI Press.1990.
[4] Meeus W.Studies on identity development in adolescence:An overview of research and some new data.Journal of Youth and adolescencez,1996,25:569-598.
[5] Meilman P W.Cross-sectional age changes in ego identity status during adolescence.Developmental Psychology,1979,15:230-231.
[6] Cramer P.Freshman to senior year:A follow-up of identity,narcissism,and defense mechanisms.Journal of Research in Personality,1998,32:156-172.
[7] Kroger J.Gender and identity:The intersection of structure,content and context.Gender Roles,1997,36(11/12):747-770.
[8] Archer S L.A feminist's approach to identity.In G.R.Adams,T.P.Gullotta,& R.Montemayor(Eds.)Adolescent identity formation (pp.25-49).Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications,1992.
[9] Darling N,Steinberg L.Parenting style as context:An integrative model.Psychological Bulletin,1993,113:487-496.
[10] Maccoby E E,Martin J A.Socialization in context of the family:parent-child interaction.In E.M.Hetherington(Eds.),Handbook of Child Psychology,Volume IV,Socialization,Personaltiy,and Social Development.New York:Wiley,1983:80-83.
[11] Steinberg L,Lamborn S D,Dornbusch SM,Darling N.Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement:Authoritative parenting,school involvement,and encouragement to Succeed.Child Development,1992,63:1266-1281.
[12] Grotevant H D,Cooper C R.Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development:Review and prospects for research on identity,relationships,and context.In E.Skoe & A.von dar Lippe(Eds.),Personality development in adolescence:A cross national and life span perspective.(pp.3-37)London:Routledge.1998.
[13] Adams G R,Marshall S K.A developmental social psychological of identity:Understanding the person-in-context.Journal of Adolescence,1996,19:429-442.
[14] Berzonsky M D.Identity myle.parental authority and identity commitment.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,2004,33:213-220.
[15] 陈香.青少年自我同一性的发展--同一性地位及其相关因素的研究.河北大学硕士论文.2001.
[16] 王树青.大学生自我同一性状态与同一性风格、亲子沟通的关系.心理发展与教育.2007,23(1):59-65.
[17] 余瑞康.720名中学生自我同一性地位研究.心理科学,2004,27(2):413-416.
[18] Bennion L D,Adams G R.A revision of the extended objective measure of ego-identity status:An identity instrument for use with late adolescents.Journal of Adescent Research,1986,1:183-198.
[19] 王树青、张文新、纪林芹等.青少年自我同一性状态问卷的修订,中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(3):221-223.
[20] Berzonsky M D.Identity Style Inventory,Version 3.Unpublished measure,State University of New York at Cortland,1992.
[21] 王树青,纪林芹,张文新.大中学生同一性风格问卷的初步修订.中国心理卫生杂志.2006,20(9):625.
[22] Goossens,L.Global Versus doumin-specific statuses in identity research:H t:comparison of two self-report measures.Journal of Adolescence,2001.24:681-699.
[23] Waterman A S.Identity as an aspect of optimal psychological fnmctioning.In G.R.Adams.T.P.Gullotta,& R.Montemayor(Eds.),Adolescent identity formation.Newbury Park,CA:sage,1992.
[24] Allison B N,Schultz J B.Interpersonal identity formation during early adolesencn,Adolescence,2001,36(143):509-523.
[25] Fregeau D L,Barker M A Measurement of the process of Adolescence:Standardization and interpretatiou.Adolescence.1986,21:913-919.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!