中学生移情与攻击行为:攻击情绪与认知的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷法调查了305名中学生,并通过结构方程模型技术考察了移情与攻击行为的关系及攻击情绪与认知的中介作用。结果表明:(1)中学生的主要攻击方式为言语攻击,性别和年级对攻击性存在影响;(2)攻击情绪与认知是移情影响攻击行为的中介变量;(3)"他人移情"完全经由中介变量抑制攻击行为,"自我敏感"则部分经由中介变量正向影响攻击行为,部分直接抑制攻击行为。

关键词: 移情, 攻击行为, 愤怒情绪, 敌意认知, 中介作用

Abstract: Methods of questionnaire and Structural Equation Models were used to investigate the relationship between empathy and aggressive behavior, and also the mediat ing effects of the anger-hostility action. Data were collected with 305 students from two middle schools. The results indicate that: (1) Oral aggression is the primary form of aggressive behaviors in middle school students; the gender and the grade have influence on aggressive behavior; (2) The anger-hostility action plays the mediating role between empathy and aggressive behavior; (3) Empathy to others impacts negatively on aggressive behavior through the mediating role. However, sensitivity of self2feeling is a two-way process, including both positive effect by mediating role and direct inhibitory effect.

Key words: empathy, aggressive behavior, anger, hostility, mediating effect

应贤慧, 戴春林. 中学生移情与攻击行为:攻击情绪与认知的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 73-78.

YING Xian-hui, DAI Chun-lin. Empathy and Aggressive Behavior of Middle School Students:The Mediating Effect of the Anger-Hostility Action[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(2): 73-78.

参考文献

[1] Anderson C A,Bushuman B J.Human aggression[J].Annual Review of Psychology,2002,53:27-51.
[2] Buss A H,Perry M.The Aggression Questionnaire[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1992,63(3):452-459
[3] Bjorkqvist K,Lagerspetz K M J,Kaukiainen A.Do girls manipulate and boys fight?Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirectaggression[J].Aggressive Behavior,1992,18:117-127.
[4] Tappor K,Beuhon M J.Sex differences in levels of physical,verbal,and indirect aggression amongst primary.school children and their assoeiations with beliefs about aggression[J].Aggressive Behavior,2004,30(2):123-145.
[5] 张文新,纪林芹,宫秀丽等.3～4岁儿童攻击行为发展的追踪研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):49-52.
[6] Walker S,Richardson D S,Green L R.Aggression among older adults:The relationship of interaction networks and gender role to direct and indirect responses[J].Aggressive Behavior,2000,26:145-154.
[7] Connor D F,Steingard R J.Anderson JJ,et al.Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression[J].Child Psychiatry and Hunmn Development,2003,33(4):279-294.
[8] Landin J L,Loukas A,Robinson S.Relational aggression in college students:Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy[J].AggressiveBehavior,2003,29(5):430-439.
[9] 张文新.独生与非独生儿童的攻击性及其影响因素的研究[J].山东师范大学学报,1997,(6):60-64.
[10] 周念丽.中小学生移情量表编制研究[J].心理科学,2001.24(5):610-635.
[11] 洪丽.高中生利他行为与移情、道德判断关系研究[D].硕士论文.福建:福建师范大学研究生部,2005.
[12] Miller P A,Eisenberg N.The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior[J].Psychological Bulletin,1988,103(3):324-344.
[13] Kaukiainen A,Bj(o)rkqyist K.Lagerspetz K,et al.The relationships between social intelligence,empathy.and three types of aggression[J].Aggressive Behavior,1999,25(2):81-89.
[14] Strayer J,Roherts W.Empathy and observed anger and aggression in five-year-olds[J].Social Development,2004,13(1):1-13.
[15] Giancola P R.The moderating effects of dispositional empathy on alcohol-related aggression in men and women[J].Journal of Abnormal Psychology,2003,112(2):275-281.
[16] Jolliffc D,Fartington D P.Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying[J].Aggressive Behavior,2006,32(6):540-5503
[17] 杜红梅,冯维.移情与后果认知训练儿童欺负行为影响的实验研究[J].心理发展与教育,2005(2):81-86
[18] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.
[19] Swick K.Preventing vidence through empathy development in families[J].Early Childhood Education Journal,2005,33(1):53-59.
[20] Hodges S A.An experiment in the development of empathy in student numes[J].Journal of Advanced Nursing,1991,16(11):1296-1300.
[21] De Wied M,Branje S J T,Meeus W H J.Empathy and conflict resolution in friendship relations among adolescents[J].Aggressive Behavior,2007,33(1):48-55.

相关文章 15

[1]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[2]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[3]	鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
[4]	张光珍, 梁淼, 梁宗保. 父母教养方式影响学前儿童社会适应的追踪研究:自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
[5]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[6]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[7]	刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[8]	金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 杨雪, 贾彦茹, 杨宏. 社会逆境感知对大学生攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 414-421.
[9]	张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持？来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[10]	高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[11]	陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 任秀华, 张璐, 张亚利, 姜永志. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367.
[12]	何婷, 宋子婧, 丁菀, 刘伟, 蔺秀云. 父母心理控制与对立违抗障碍儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 219-228.
[13]	宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 675-682.
[14]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 605-613.
[15]	孙丽君, 杜红芹, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 胡祥恩. 心理虐待与忽视对青少年攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 65-75.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed