美术生和非美术生的动作记忆表象编码

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究发现表象通过促进记忆成绩、抑制知觉干扰和遗忘来促进操作效应,然而,以往研究忽略具体形象思维在表象加工中的作用。实验1和2选取美术生和非美术生来控制被试的具体形象思维水平,采用知觉干扰任务和定向遗忘范式探讨操作效应中具体形象思维水平对表象作用的影响。结果显示,相比非美术生,美术生的表象编码可增强记忆表现、抑制知觉干扰和遗忘。说明具体形象思维可能是表象编码促进操作效应的前提。

关键词: 操作效应, 具体形象思维, 表象编码, 促进, 抑制

Abstract: Recently, some studies have found that imagery could promote the creation of the subject-performed task (SPT) effect by improving memory performance and inhibiting irrelevant perceptual interference and forgetting. However, these studies ignored the fact that the level of concrete image thinking is the basis of the smooth progress of imagery processing. Therefore, on the basis of previous studies, experiment 1 and 2 explored whether the ability of concrete imagery thinking is an important prerequisite for imagery to promote action memory and inhibit irrelevant interference and forgetting by controlling the participants' ability of concrete imagery thinking(art students or not). The results of experiment 1 and 2 showed that the ability of concrete image thinking can significantly affect the size of the SPT effect. Compared with non-art students, art students could enhance the inhibitory effect of image encoding on irrelevant perceptual interference and forgetting.

Key words: subject performed task effect, concrete image thinking, imagery encoding, promotion, inhibition

中图分类号:

B844

王丽娟, 马嘉琳. 美术生和非美术生的动作记忆表象编码[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 457-464.

WANG Lijuan, MA Jialin. Imagery Encoding in Action Memory of Art Students and Non-art Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 457-464.

参考文献

Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1978).Transformations on representations of objects in space. In Perceptual Coding(pp.105-146). Academic Press.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 267-281.
Earles, J. L., & Kersten, A. W. (2002). Directed forgetting of actions by younger and older adults.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 383-388.
Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 239-254.
Leynes, P. A. (2002). The effect of specific test queries on source-monitoring event-related potentials.Brain and Cognition, 50(2), 218-233.
Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45(3), 197-210.
Leynes, P. A., Cairns, A., & Crawford, J. T. (2005). Event-related potentials indicate that reality monitoring differs from external source monitoring.The American Journal of Psychology, 118(4), 497-524.
Leynes, P. A., & Kakadia, B. (2013). Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 189-199.
Li, G., & Wang, L. (2015). The effects of encoding modality on event-based prospective memory in 7-9 years old children.The Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(14), 725-738.
Li, G., Wang, L., & Han, Y. (2015). Directed forgetting of negative performed actions is Difficult: A behavioral study.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 53-61.
Liang, B. (2007). Concrete versus abstract thought: The effect of culture on imagery generation.AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings, 18(2), 305-306.
Liang, B., Cherian, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Concrete thinking or ideographic language: Which is the reason for chinese people's higher imagery-generation abilities?International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 52-60.
Liang, B., & Kale, S. H. (2012). Cultural differences in imagery generation: The influence of abstract versus concrete thinking.Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 333-339.
Ma, J., Wang, L., Chen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Imagery processing in action memory-mental imagery is necessary to the subject-performed task effect.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 12-23.
Marks, W., & Dulaney, C. L. (2001). Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1464-1473.
Masumoto, K., Yamaguchi, M., Sutani, K., Tsuneto, S., Fujita, A., & Tonoike, M. (2006). Reactivation of physical motor information in the memory of action events.Brain Research, 11(1), 102-109.
Nyberg, L., Petersson, K. M., Nilsson, L. G., Sandblom, J., Aberg, C., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.Neuroimage, 14(2), 521-528.
Sahakyan, L., Waldum, E. R., Benjamin, A. S., & Bickett, S. P. (2009). Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 464-76.
Taylor, T. L., & Fawcett, J. M. (2011). Larger ior effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization.Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1790-1814.
Wojcik, D. Z., Allen, R. J., Brown, C., & Souchay, C. (2011). Memory for actions in autism spectrum disorder.Memory, 19(6), 549-558.
Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G., & Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 143-156.
Zhao, M. F., Zimmer, H. D., Zhou, X., & Fu, X. (2016). Enactment supports unitisation of action components and enhances the contribution of familiarity to associative recognition.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(8), 932-947.
李琦, 赵迪, 郭春彦. (2007). 从词频和新旧效应探讨再认测验中的定向遗忘. 心理科学, 30(5), 39-42.
郭珊珊, 孙志宏. (2018). 运用生物表象培养学生形象思维能力. 中学生物教学, 14(5), 11-12.
马嘉琳. (2021). 动作记忆操作效应中表象的作用机制 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
王兰芳. (2012). 儿童形象思维在美术教学中得到发展探析. 宿州教育学院学报, 15(3), 178-178.
危辉, 潘云鹤. (2001). 形象思维的视表象基础. 浙江大学学报, 35(2), 152-156.
张馨元. (2017). 动作记忆SPT优势效应的加工机制—信息表征的视角 (博士学位论文).吉林大学, 长春.
张剑, 庄洁, 陈佩杰. (2009). 运动视觉研究进展. 中国运动医学杂志, 28(02), 233-236.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[3]	张丽, 潘霈霖, 牛梓瑜, 马敏. 安静自我：基于平衡和成长视角的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 288-297.
[4]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[5]	于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[6]	吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[7]	孙俊才, 孙亚茹, 张文海. 人际情绪调节与内隐/外显积极情绪的关系:情绪调节困难的调节效应与表达抑制的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 279-286.
[8]	吴瑕, 钟希苹, 姜云鹏. 不同搜索情境下老化对自上而下注意加工的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 26-34.
[9]	邓珏, 叶子青, 周加仙. 音乐训练对统计学习能力的促进作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 904-912.
[10]	刘湍丽, 单亚菲, 邢敏, 白学军. 工作记忆中的部分线索效应:任务呈现方式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 489-497.
[11]	姚海娟, 仝娜, 张珊珊, 巩彦斌. 认知抑制对科学创造力和艺术创造力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 353-362.
[12]	刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦. 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 257-265.
[13]	王苏, 盖笑松. 3～4岁幼儿冷热自我调节的发展趋势及性别差异——一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 641-648.
[14]	于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏, 张涵, 刘静. 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 385-393.
[15]	陈琼, 赵俊峰, 谷璜, 邢小莉, 李晓铭. 听障儿童认知抑制控制的脑电特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 275-282.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed