心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 457-464.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

美术生和非美术生的动作记忆表象编码

王丽娟1, 马嘉琳2   

  1. 1. 东北师范大学心理学院, 长春 130024;
    2. 河南大学教育学部, 开封 475000
  • 发布日期:2023-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 王丽娟 E-mail:wanglj699@nenu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA190016);河南省科技攻关项目(222102320175)。

Imagery Encoding in Action Memory of Art Students and Non-art Students

WANG Lijuan1, MA Jialin2   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
    2. Faculty of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475000
  • Published:2023-07-19

摘要: 研究发现表象通过促进记忆成绩、抑制知觉干扰和遗忘来促进操作效应,然而,以往研究忽略具体形象思维在表象加工中的作用。实验1和2选取美术生和非美术生来控制被试的具体形象思维水平,采用知觉干扰任务和定向遗忘范式探讨操作效应中具体形象思维水平对表象作用的影响。结果显示,相比非美术生,美术生的表象编码可增强记忆表现、抑制知觉干扰和遗忘。说明具体形象思维可能是表象编码促进操作效应的前提。

关键词: 操作效应, 具体形象思维, 表象编码, 促进, 抑制

Abstract: Recently, some studies have found that imagery could promote the creation of the subject-performed task (SPT) effect by improving memory performance and inhibiting irrelevant perceptual interference and forgetting. However, these studies ignored the fact that the level of concrete image thinking is the basis of the smooth progress of imagery processing. Therefore, on the basis of previous studies, experiment 1 and 2 explored whether the ability of concrete imagery thinking is an important prerequisite for imagery to promote action memory and inhibit irrelevant interference and forgetting by controlling the participants' ability of concrete imagery thinking(art students or not). The results of experiment 1 and 2 showed that the ability of concrete image thinking can significantly affect the size of the SPT effect. Compared with non-art students, art students could enhance the inhibitory effect of image encoding on irrelevant perceptual interference and forgetting.

Key words: subject performed task effect, concrete image thinking, imagery encoding, promotion, inhibition

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1978).Transformations on representations of objects in space. In Perceptual Coding(pp.105-146). Academic Press.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 267-281.
Earles, J. L., & Kersten, A. W. (2002). Directed forgetting of actions by younger and older adults.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 383-388.
Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 239-254.
Leynes, P. A. (2002). The effect of specific test queries on source-monitoring event-related potentials.Brain and Cognition, 50(2), 218-233.
Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45(3), 197-210.
Leynes, P. A., Cairns, A., & Crawford, J. T. (2005). Event-related potentials indicate that reality monitoring differs from external source monitoring.The American Journal of Psychology, 118(4), 497-524.
Leynes, P. A., & Kakadia, B. (2013). Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 189-199.
Li, G., & Wang, L. (2015). The effects of encoding modality on event-based prospective memory in 7-9 years old children.The Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(14), 725-738.
Li, G., Wang, L., & Han, Y. (2015). Directed forgetting of negative performed actions is Difficult: A behavioral study.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 53-61.
Liang, B. (2007). Concrete versus abstract thought: The effect of culture on imagery generation.AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings, 18(2), 305-306.
Liang, B., Cherian, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Concrete thinking or ideographic language: Which is the reason for chinese people's higher imagery-generation abilities?International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 52-60.
Liang, B., & Kale, S. H. (2012). Cultural differences in imagery generation: The influence of abstract versus concrete thinking.Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 333-339.
Ma, J., Wang, L., Chen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Imagery processing in action memory-mental imagery is necessary to the subject-performed task effect.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 12-23.
Marks, W., & Dulaney, C. L. (2001). Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1464-1473.
Masumoto, K., Yamaguchi, M., Sutani, K., Tsuneto, S., Fujita, A., & Tonoike, M. (2006). Reactivation of physical motor information in the memory of action events.Brain Research, 11(1), 102-109.
Nyberg, L., Petersson, K. M., Nilsson, L. G., Sandblom, J., Aberg, C., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.Neuroimage, 14(2), 521-528.
Sahakyan, L., Waldum, E. R., Benjamin, A. S., & Bickett, S. P. (2009). Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 464-76.
Taylor, T. L., & Fawcett, J. M. (2011). Larger ior effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization.Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1790-1814.
Wojcik, D. Z., Allen, R. J., Brown, C., & Souchay, C. (2011). Memory for actions in autism spectrum disorder.Memory, 19(6), 549-558.
Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G., & Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 143-156.
Zhao, M. F., Zimmer, H. D., Zhou, X., & Fu, X. (2016). Enactment supports unitisation of action components and enhances the contribution of familiarity to associative recognition.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(8), 932-947.
李琦, 赵迪, 郭春彦. (2007). 从词频和新旧效应探讨再认测验中的定向遗忘. 心理科学, 30(5), 39-42.
郭珊珊, 孙志宏. (2018). 运用生物表象培养学生形象思维能力. 中学生物教学, 14(5), 11-12.
马嘉琳. (2021). 动作记忆操作效应中表象的作用机制 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
王兰芳. (2012). 儿童形象思维在美术教学中得到发展探析. 宿州教育学院学报, 15(3), 178-178.
危辉, 潘云鹤. (2001). 形象思维的视表象基础. 浙江大学学报, 35(2), 152-156.
张馨元. (2017). 动作记忆SPT优势效应的加工机制—信息表征的视角 (博士学位论文).吉林大学, 长春.
张剑, 庄洁, 陈佩杰. (2009). 运动视觉研究进展. 中国运动医学杂志, 28(02), 233-236.
[1] 韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[2] 刘湍丽, 许杨, 白学军. 部分线索对记忆提取的影响:理论解释的演变[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 285-294.
[3] 辛聪, 程平, 郑远霞, 刘国雄. 拼图能力与幼儿抑制控制的关系:持续性注意和言语能力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 626-638.
[4] 牛更枫, 金斯妤, 史晓涵, 杨文城, 周宗奎. 跨越年龄数字鸿沟:老年人互联网使用行为及其促进和阻碍因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 740-749.
[5] 王艺帆, 张环. 抑制在主动遗忘发生过程中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 589-597.
[6] 贾丽娜, 阴晓娟. 抑制差异与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:信息相关度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
[7] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[8] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[9] 张丽, 潘霈霖, 牛梓瑜, 马敏. 安静自我:基于平衡和成长视角的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 288-297.
[10] 彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[11] 于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[12] 吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[13] 孙俊才, 孙亚茹, 张文海. 人际情绪调节与内隐/外显积极情绪的关系:情绪调节困难的调节效应与表达抑制的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 279-286.
[14] 吴瑕, 钟希苹, 姜云鹏. 不同搜索情境下老化对自上而下注意加工的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 26-34.
[15] 邓珏, 叶子青, 周加仙. 音乐训练对统计学习能力的促进作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 904-912.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!