流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响:情绪调节策略的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.01.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以397名流动儿童为被试，采用问卷法考察流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响以及情绪调节策略在其中的调节作用。结果表明：（1）流动儿童学业情绪对控制感的负向预测作用高于对基本能力感的预测作用，其中有恼火、羞愧、无助对基本能力感预测作用显著；认知重评对基本能力感预测作用显著，并且认知重评情绪调节策略对恼火、沮丧与基本能力感的关系有调节作用，而表达抑制对无助与基本能力感的关系有调节作用。（2）流动儿童学业情绪中除恼火外，焦虑、羞愧、厌倦、无助、沮丧和心烦对控制感的预测作用均显著。认知重评和表达抑制均对控制感的预测作用显著，并且认知重评与羞愧、厌倦、沮丧的调节作用显著，表达抑制与沮丧的调节作用显著。

关键词: 情绪调节策略, 流动儿童, 学习自我效能感, 学业情绪, 认知重评, 表达抑制

Abstract: A total of 397 migrant children were recruited as subjects with questionnaire method to investigate the association of negative academic emotions on perceived academic self-efficacy of migrant children and the moderation effect of emotion regulation strategies on that. The results showed that:Firstly, the negative predictive effect of academic emotions on the sense of control was significantly higher than that of the basic sense of ability. Among them, only the predictive effect of angry, shame and helpless on the basic sense of ability were significant. Moreover, only the predictive effect of cognitive re-evaluation on the basic sense of ability were significant. And, the cognitive re-evaluation had the moderating effect on the relationship of angry, depression and the basic sense of ability. And the expression suppression had the moderating effect on the relationship of helpless and the basic sense of ability. Secondly, except for angry, in the academic emotions of the migration children, the predictive effect of anxiety, shame, boredom, helpless, depression and vexation on the sense of control were significant. Both the predictive effect of cognitive re-evaluation and expression suppression of emotion regulation strategies on the sense of control were significant. Besides, the moderating effect of cognitive re-evaluation on the shame, boredom, depression were significant and the moderating effect of expression suppression on the depression were significant.

Key words: emotion regulation strategies, migrant children, perceived academic self-efficacy, academic emotions, cognitive re-evaluation, expression suppression

中图分类号:

G442

王道阳, 陆祥, 殷欣. 流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响:情绪调节策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 56-64.

WANG Daoyang, LU Xiang, YIN Xin. The Association of Negative Academic Emotions on Perceived Academic Self-efficacy of Migrant Children: The Moderating Role of Emotion Regulation Strategies[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(1): 56-64.

参考文献

Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of a constructivist learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18(1), 47-67.

Cohen, G. L., Julio, G., Nancy, A., & Allison, M. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap:A social-psychological intervention. Science,313(5791), 1307-1310.

Davidson, R. (2010). Size distortion of bootstrap tests:An example from unit root testing. Review of Economic Analysis, 2(2), 169-193.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory in health care and its relations to motivational interviewing:a few comments. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1-6.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation:An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 271-299.

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation:Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.

Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1996). The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of Management, 22(4), 527-547.

Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation:Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 153-158.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement:A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.

Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion Regulation and Memory:The Cognitive Costs of Keeping One's Cool. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 410-424.

Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2008). Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom:A multidimensional phenomenon. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 443-459.

边玉芳. (2004). 学习自我效能感量表的编制. 心理科学, 27(05), 1218-1222.

董云英, 周仁来, 高鑫. (2014). 积极情绪的唤醒程度对空间工作记忆的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(5), 761-767.

董妍, 俞国良. (2007). 青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用. 心理学报,39(5), 852-860.

段成荣, 吕利丹, 王宗萍, 郭静. (2013). 我国流动儿童生存和发展:问题与对策. 南方人口, 28(4), 44-55.

李洁, 宋尚桂. (2013). 大学生学业自我效能感、学业情绪与学习适应性. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(9), 1429-1431.

蔺秀云, 方晓义, 刘杨, 兰菁. (2009). 流动儿童歧视知觉与心理健康水平的关系及其心理机制. 心理学报, 41(10), 967-979.

邵景进, 李丹, 郭芳, 武盼盼, 张大均. (2016). 父母教育卷入与流动儿童的学业成绩、情绪适应:自主感和能力感的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 16(1), 48-55.

申继亮, 刘霞, 赵景欣, 师保国. (2015). 城镇化进程中农民工子女心理发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 108-116.

王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 杜卫. (2007). 情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究.中国健康心理学杂志, 15(6), 503-505.

王明珠, 邹泓, 李晓巍, 张文娟, 王英芊, 蒋索. (2015). 幼儿父母婚姻冲突与教养方式的关系:父母情绪调节策略的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 279-286.

王振宏, 郭德俊. (2003). Gross情绪调节过程与策略研究述评. 心理科学进展, 11(6), 629-634.

俞国良, 董妍. (2006). 学习不良青少年与一般青少年学业情绪特点的比较研究. 心理科学, 29(4), 811-814.

袁加锦, 龙泉杉, 丁南翔, 娄熠雪, 刘莹莹, 杨洁敏. (2014). 负性情绪调节的效率:中国文化背景下认知重评与表达抑制的对比. 中国科学:生命科学,44(6), 602-613.

相关文章 15

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[3]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[4]	郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系：自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[5]	顾红磊, 丁仲羽, 夏天生, 王立昭. 自我批评与青少年自伤:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 418-426.
[6]	孙俊才, 孙亚茹, 张文海. 人际情绪调节与内隐/外显积极情绪的关系:情绪调节困难的调节效应与表达抑制的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 279-286.
[7]	袁柯曼, 李白璐, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系:个体保护因子的补偿效应和保护效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
[8]	汪倩倩, 范翠英, 褚晓伟. 青少年网络受欺负与网络欺负的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 216-227.
[9]	刘小先, 龚少英, 周治金, 封晓伟, 于全磊. 父母自主支持、心理控制与初中生创意自我效能的关系:学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 45-53.
[10]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.
[11]	刘济榕, 王泉泉. 日常压力对流动儿童诚信感的影响:社会支持与逆境信念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 548-557.
[12]	王晖, 熊昱可, 刘霞. 亲子关系和朋友支持对流动儿童情绪和行为适应的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 614-624.
[13]	王中会, 蔺秀云. 流动儿童的亲子依恋与其城市适应的关系:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 284-293.
[14]	周宵, 伍新春, 王文超, 田雨馨. 青少年重复创伤暴露与创伤后应激障碍的关系:安全感与认知重评的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 90-97.
[15]	田雨馨, 伍新春, 王文超, 周宵. 青少年依恋对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:认知重评和表达抑制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 105-111.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed