心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 546-557.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.11

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系:个体保护因子的补偿效应和保护效应

袁柯曼1,2,3, 李白璐4, 梁丽婵1,2,3, 边玉芳1,2,3   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心, 北京 100875;
    2. 北京师范大学儿童家庭教育研究中心, 北京 100875;
    3. 北京师范大学心理健康与教育研究所, 北京 100875;
    4. 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司, 北京 100043
  • 发布日期:2021-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 边玉芳 E-mail:bianyufang66@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目（20ZDA071）。

Cumulative Contextual Risk and Subjective Well-being in Migrant Children: The Compensatory Effect and Protective Effect of Individual Protective Factors

YUAN Keman1,2,3, LI Bailu4, LIANG Lichan1,2,3, BIAN Yufang1,2,3   

  1. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Child and Family Education Research Center, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Institute of Mental Health and Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    4. User Research Department, Beijing Bytedance Network Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 100043
  • Published:2021-07-26

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 对511名初二年级的流动儿童（平均年龄：14.37±0.78岁）及其家长进行问卷调查，考察累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系，及自尊、心理弹性和情绪调节等个体保护因子的作用方式差异及累积效应。结果发现：（1）累积情境风险负向预测流动儿童主观幸福感，各领域风险预测作用由大到小依次是家庭关系风险、同伴风险和学校风险，家庭社会经济地位风险预测作用不显著；（2）自尊在各领域风险与主观幸福感的关系中均发挥补偿效应；心理弹性在同伴、学校领域风险中发挥补偿效应，在家庭关系领域风险中发挥保护效应；情绪调节仅在同伴领域风险中发挥保护效应；（3）个体面临的风险数越多，具备的保护因子数越少，流动儿童主观幸福感越低。

关键词: 流动儿童, 累积情境风险, 主观幸福感, 个体保护因子

Abstract: This study recruited 511 migrant children who were in the second grade of middle school (Mean age:14.37±0.78) and their parents to complete questionnaires in order to explore the relationship between cumulative contextual risk and subjective well-being, and the different roles of self-esteem, resilience and emotion regulation as well as their cumulative effect on the relationship between cumulative contextual risk and subjective well-being. The results indicated that cumulative contextual risk predicted subjective well-being of migrant children significantly and negatively, and the role of risk prediction in various fields from large to small was followed by family relationship risk, peer risk and school risk, but the prediction effect of family socioeconomic status risk was not significant. Secondly, self-esteem played a compensatory effect on subject well-being in all field of risk, resilience played a compensatory effect in fields of peer and school risks as well as played a protective effect in the field of family relationship risk, emotion regulation only played a protective-reactive effect in the field of peer risk. Thirdly, the more risk factors individual faced, the less individual protective factors individual owned, the lower level of subjective well-being was.

Key words: migrant children, cumulative contextual risk, subjective well-being, individual protective factor

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (pp. 74-103). Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion:Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development:Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being.American Psychologist, 31(2), 117-124.
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale:The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76-82.
Chai, X., Li, X., Ye, Z., Li, Y., & Lin, D. (2019). Subjective well-being among left-behind children in rural China:The role of ecological assets and individual strength. Child:Care, Health and Development, 45(1), 63-70.
Dubow, E. F., & Luster, T. (1990). Adjustment of children born to teenage mothers:The contribution of risk and protective factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 393-404.
Diener, E.(Ed.).(2009). The science of well-being:The collected works of Ed Diener. The Netherlands:Springer.
Evans, G. W., & Marcynyszyn, L. A. (2004). Environmental justice, cumulative environmental risk, and health among low-and middle-income children in upstate New York. American Journal of Public Health, 94(11), 1942-1944.
Evans, G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013).Cumulative risk and child development. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1342-1396.
Flouri, E., Tzavidis, N., & Kallis, C. (2010). Adverse life events, area socioeconomic disadvantage, and psychopathology and resilience in young children:The importance of risk factors' accumulation and protective factors' specificity. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(6), 535-546.
Gassman-Pines, A., & Yoshikawa, H. (2006). The effects of antipoverty programs on children's cumulative level of poverty-related risk. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 981-999.
Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). As marital conflict from the child's perspective:The Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63(3), 558-572.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.
Gerard, J. M., & Buehler, C. (2004). Cumulative environmental risk and youth maladjustment:The role of youth attributes. Child Development, 75(6), 1832-1849.
Gross, J. J. (Ed.).(2013). Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York, NY, US:Guilford Press.
Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(4), 416-430.
Hu, T., Zhang, D., & Wang, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the trait resilience and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 18-27.
Jiang, Y., Ming, H.,Tian, Y., Huang, S., Sun, L., Li, H. J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Cumulative risk and subjective well-being among rural-to-urban migrant adolescents in China:Differential moderating roles of stress mindset and resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-21.
Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Ming, H., Huang, S., & Lin, D. (2019). Stressful life events and well-being among rural-to-urban migrant adolescents:The moderating role of the stress mindset and differences between genders. Journal of Adolescence, 74, 24-32.
Kraemer, H. C., Lowe, K. K., & Kupfer, D. J. (Eds.).(2005). To Your Health:How to Understand What Research Tells Us about Risk. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y. S.,Koh, Y. J., & Leventhal, B. (2005). School bullying and suicidal risk in Korean middle school students. Pediatrics, 115(2), 357-363.
Lei, H., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Yang, H., Du, W., & Shao, J. (2019). Cumulative risk and problem behaviors among Chinese left-behind children:A moderated mediation model. School Psychology International, 40(3), 309-328.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159.
Lengua, L. J., Bush, N. R., Long, A. C., Kovacs, E. A., & Trancik, A. M. (2008). Effortful control as a moderator of the relation between contextual risk factors and growth in adjustment problems. Development and Psychopathology, 20(2), 509-528.
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience:A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
Liu, T., Zhang, X., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Family socioeconomic status and the cognitive competence of very young children from migrant and non-migrant Chinese families:The mediating role of parenting self-efficacy and parental involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51, 229-241.
Li, X., & Zheng, X. (2014). Adult attachment orientations and subjective well-being:Emotional intelligence and self-esteem as moderators. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 42(8), 1257-1265.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic:Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood:Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611-621.
Pianta, R. C. (1992). Child-parent relationship scale. Unpublished Measure, University of Virginia, 11, 39-41.
Rosenberg, M. (Ed.).(1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Rutter, M. (2000). Resilience reconsidered:Conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 651-682). Cambridge University Press.
Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 1-12.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior:The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93-159.
Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology:The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 52-68.
Shenaar-Golan, V., & Goldberg, A. (2019). Subjective well-being, parent-adolescent relationship, and perceived parenting style among Israeli adolescents involved in a gap-year volunteering service. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(8), 1068-1082.
Wang, D., Li, S., Hu, M., Dong, D., & Tao, S. (2017). Negative academic emotion and psychological well-being in Chinese rural-to-urban migrant adolescents:Examining the moderating role of cognitive reappraisal. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1312.
Wright, M. O. D., & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks(Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 17-37). Boston, MA:Springer US.
Wright, M. O. D.,Masten, A. S., & Narayan, A. J. (2013). Resilience processes in development:Four waves of research on positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks(Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 15-37). Boston, MA:Springer US.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41.
边玉芳, 梁丽婵, 张颖. (2016). 充分重视家庭对儿童心理发展的重要作用. 北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 61(5), 46-54.
鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. (2014). 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力:子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 30(5), 482-495.
池丽萍, 辛自强. (2003). 儿童对婚姻冲突的感知量表修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(8), 554-556.
柴晓运, 郭海英, 林丹华, 刘影, 苏双. (2018). 情绪调节策略对流动儿童主观幸福感的影响:自尊和心理弹性的序列中介作用. 心理科学, 41(1), 71-76.
董奇, 林崇德. (2011). 中国儿童青少年心理发育标准化测验简介. 北京:科学出版社.
侯娟, 邹泓, 李晓巍. (2009). 流动儿童家庭环境的特点及其对生活满意度的影响. 心理发展与教育, 25(2), 78-85.
郝振, 崔丽娟. (2014). 受歧视知觉对流动儿童社会融入的影响:中介机制及自尊的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 137-144.
金灿灿, 刘艳, 陈丽. (2012). 社会负性环境对流动和留守儿童问题行为的影响:亲子和同伴关系的调节作用. 心理科学, 35(5), 1119-1125.
江光荣. (2004). 中小学班级环境:结构与测量. 心理科学, 27(4), 839-843.
贾继超, 刘金同, 王旸, 张燕, 陈洁. (2014). 农村初中生主观幸福感及与自尊, 社会支持的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 522-524.
赖越颖. (2008). 流动儿童家庭教育现状的个案研究 (博士学位论文), 西南大学, 重庆.
林崇德. (2002). 发展心理学. 杭州:浙江教育出版社.
李董平. (2012). 多重生态学风险因素与青少年社会适应:风险建模与作用机制研究 (博士学位论文), 华南师范大学, 广州.
李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强. (2016). 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(12), 1519-1537.
鲁化堂. (2007). 城市流动儿童教育问题与对策研究 (博士学位论文), 华中师范大学, 武汉.
刘红云. (2019). 高级心理统计. 北京:中国人民大学出版社.
陆学艺. (2002). 当代中国社会阶层研究报告/中国社会阶层研究丛书. 北京:社会科学文献出版社.
申继亮. (2009). 处境不利儿童的心理发展与教育对策研究. 北京:北京经济科学出版社.
申继亮, 刘霞, 赵景欣, 师保国. (2015). 城镇化进程中农民工子女心理发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 108-116.
苏志强, 张大均, 邵景进. (2015). 社会经济地位与留守儿童社会适应的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 212-219.
童星, 缪建东. (2020). 父母参与对流动儿童学校适应的影响——教师关怀的中介作用. 教育学术月刊, 1, 12-17.
王芳, 师保国. (2014). 歧视知觉, 社会支持和自尊对流动儿童幸福感的动态影响. 贵州师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 32(1), 14-19.
王晖, 熊昱可, 刘霞. (2018). 亲子关系和朋友支持对流动儿童情绪和行为适应的保护作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 614-624.
王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 杜卫. (2007). 情绪调节量表的信度和效度研究. 中国行为医学科学, 16(9), 846-848.
王婷, 李庆功, 何佳萍. (2012). 认知情绪调节对流动儿童同伴依恋和孤独感的调节作用. 应用心理学, 18(3), 256-262.
王中会, 蔺秀云. (2012). 流动儿童心理韧性及对其城市适应的影响. 中国特殊教育, 12, 12-18.
王中会, 童辉杰, 程萌. (2016). 流动儿童社会认同对学校适应的影响. 中国特殊教育. 189(3), 52-57.
许桂林, 刘丙元. (2016). 当代青少年主观幸福感发展状况及其影响因素研究. 青少年学刊, 3, 9-15.
熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 辛亮, 徐颖. (2020). 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系——心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 36(1), 94-102.
熊猛, 叶一舵. (2011). 中国城市农民工子女心理健康研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1798-1813.
徐馨琦. (2005). 青少年情绪调节策略, 人际压力及情绪反应关系的研究 (硕士学位论文), 首都师范大学, 北京.
于肖楠, 张建新.(2007). 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较.心理科学, 30(05), 1169-1171.
于音, 陶婷, 王利刚, 崔雪英, 樊春雷, 高文斌. (2019). 流动儿童被欺负现状及其与社会支持的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, (11), 833-838.
袁晓娇, 方晓义, 刘杨, 蔺秀云. (2012). 流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感, 社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 28(3), 283-291.
叶枝, 柴晓运, 郭海英, 翁欢欢, 林丹华. (2017). 流动性, 教育安置方式和心理弹性对流动儿童孤独感的影响:一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 595-604.
张春妹, 武敬, 朱文闻. (2019). 学校人际关系与流动儿童的自尊:心理弹性的中介作用. 中国社会心理学评论, (1), 38-55.
张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 方晓义, 舒曾, 蔺秀云. (2017). 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 153-162.
张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. (2019). 亲子, 同伴, 师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究. 心理发展与教育, 35(4), 458-466.
郑雪, 严标宾, 邱林, 张兴贵. (2004). 幸福心理学. 广州:暨南大学出版社.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(06), 942-950.
邹泓, 周晖, 周燕. (1998). 中学生友谊, 友谊质量与同伴接纳的关系. 北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 1, 43-50.
朱丹, 王国锋, 刘军, 彭小虎. (2013). 流动儿童同伴关系的弹性发展特点研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 654-657.
[1] 唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[2] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[3] 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[4] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[5] 陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 社交媒体自我控制失败影响硕士生主观幸福感的心理机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 882-888.
[6] 牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 407-418.
[7] 陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[8] 池文韬, 桑青松, 舒首立. 大学生专业内部动机与主观幸福感的关系:专业投入与主观专业成就的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 477-485.
[9] 衡书鹏, 赵换方, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 朋友圈点赞与主观幸福感的关系:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 341-349.
[10] 郭瑾瑾, 牛璐, 谢笑春, 王鹏程, 雷雳. 线上“秀恩爱”与旁观者主观幸福感的关系:自尊的中介作用和依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 359-366.
[11] 吴玉婷, 苑鑫, 王雨晴, 朱慧, 毛叶琳, 金灿灿. 广场舞组织氛围和老年人主观幸福感的关系:组织认同和自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 624-631.
[12] 张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[13] 牛玉柏, 郝泽生, 王任振, 洪芳. 老年人乐观、领悟社会支持与主观幸福感的关系—控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 227-235.
[14] 刘济榕, 王泉泉. 日常压力对流动儿童诚信感的影响:社会支持与逆境信念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 548-557.
[15] 王晖, 熊昱可, 刘霞. 亲子关系和朋友支持对流动儿童情绪和行为适应的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 614-624.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发